You are about to action:

Object being modified by the action

Do you want to proceed?

Share Video Link

https://www.bitchute.com/video/MdPWKltu4YGw/

Click to copy, then share by pasting into your messages, comments, social media posts and websites.

Embed Video HTML

Click to copy, then add into your webpages so users can view and engage with this video from your site.

Share to Social Media

Share to social media by clicking on the quick share links.

Report Content

Reason

Please select the most appropriate reason from the list provided.

Note: For a more detailed description of each reason, see our Community Guidelines.

Additional Comments

Please add any additonal comments that will help with the assessment of your request.

Note: Copyright claims must contain all the items specified within the Copyright Policy.

Email Submissions

We also accept reports via email. Please see the Guidelines Enforcement Process for instructions on how to make a request via email.

Thank you for submitting your report

We will investigate and take the appropriate action.

Add to Playlist

Hijacking the Anti-Cancel Culture Initiative, Part 2 of 2 - The Signers

Next video playing soon

Click to cancel

Autoplay has been paused

Click to watch next video

First published at 05:01 UTC on July 12th, 2020.

#cancelculture
#harpers
#politicalcorrectness

VforVernon

subscribers

BitChute Advertisement

Be sure to watch Part 1 beforehand: https://www.bitchute.com/video/kf0V9tVfk7j8/

In Part 2 I single out a few of the ones that signed the Harpers letter that I know something about, to varying degrees. I offer my opinions on them, and why I find it…

Be sure to watch Part 1 beforehand: https://www.bitchute.com/video/kf0V9tVfk7j8/

In Part 2 I single out a few of the ones that signed the Harpers letter that I know something about, to varying degrees. I offer my opinions on them, and why I find it ironic, disappointing, or downright unsurprising that any of these would sign on to such a thing. I also talk about what Cancel Culture is really about beyond the "free speech of overprivileged commentators" scope, that the mindset of this article doesn't seem to fully grasp, if at all.

LESS