Businesses Don't Deserve Employees If They Can't Pay More Than Unemployment - Jody Bruchon

Let's just face facts: there are a LOT of people that don't even have the most basic clue about how the United States economy works. You don't just turn up the wage knob and everyone becomes rich and wants for nothing. You also can't compete with the federal government when they can just make the money printer go brrr all day long to back their "enhanced unemployment" that more than doubles weekly unemployment checks for most workers. Don't be surprised when the businesses have blacklisted you from the hiring process for your shenanigans...and sooner or later, you WILL be paying back what you've been paid, in the form of hyper-inflation.

The legal case referenced in the video is Textile Workers Union v. Darlington Mfg. Co., 380 U.S. 263 (1965), in which it was ruled that shutting down the entire business--even in direct response to unionization--is not an unfair labor practice:
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/380/263/

The most relevant portion of the ruling to this discussion is as follows: "One of the purposes of the Labor Relations Act is to prohibit the discriminatory use of economic weapons in an effort to obtain future benefits. The discriminatory lockout designed to destroy a union, like a "runaway shop," is a lever which has been used to discourage collective employee activities in the future. But a complete liquidation of a business yields no such future benefit for the employer if the termination is bona fide. It may be motivated more by spite against the union than by business reasons, but it is not the type of discrimination which is prohibited by the Act. The personal satisfaction that such an employer may derive from standing on his beliefs, and the mere possibility that other employers will follow his example, are surely too remote to be considered dangers at which the labor statutes were aimed. Although employees may be prohibited from engaging in a strike under certain conditions, no one would consider it a violation of the Act for the same employees to quit their employment en masse, even if motivated by a desire to ruin the employer. The very permanence of such action would negate any future economic benefit to the employees. The employer's right to go out of business is no different."

SUPPORT LINKS
Ko-Fi: https://ko-fi.com/L3L02069D
SubscribeStar: https://www.subscribestar.com/JodyBruchon
Flattr: https://flattr.com/@JodyBruchon
PayPal: https://paypal.me/JodyBruchon

MY WEBSITES
Personal/programming site: https://www.jodybruchon.com/
Video production site: http://www.gazingcat.com/
Computer repair site: http://nctritech.com/

FOLLOW ME ON OTHER VIDEO HOSTS
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/JodyBruchon
BitChute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/jodybruchon/
Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/JodyBruchon