Lawsuit Over Bait & Switch Pfizer Vaccine Approval

Is the Pfizer shot approved or not? Here's the perspective of an attorney litigating this exact question...
As we've covered previously the FDA Approved Comirnaty Vaccine is not the same as the widely available Pfizer EUA vaccine which most people have access to in the United States.
Essentially the distinction between these two products may only be a legal distinction but it's still a very important point to consider and this recently filed lawsuit from Children's Health Defense lays it out quite clearly. Basically what it says is that FDA is playing a bait and switch game by allowing an "approval" for the Comirnaty product while at the same time extending the EUA on the existing Pfizer BioNtech product which according to the EUA rules should not even be legal.
Why is it not legal?
When there is a FDA Biologic License it nullifies all associated EUA products. At this point there is supposedly an approval that may not be finalized but now has a lawsuit filed against the FDA over it. They are accused of playing a "bait and switch" game of approving a product that has very little or no supply and tricking the public into thinking they are getting a fully licensed and approved product when in reality they aren't.
The Comirnaty product is apparently available in Australia and some other countries but not yet in the US.
The distinction between Comirnaty and Pfizer BioNtech EUA product is at least primarily a legal distinction but this begs the question if the products are identical then why not just relabel them and distribute them under the new Biologics license?

Source : https://www.knowingthetruth.com/lawsuit-over-bait-switch-pfizer-vaccine-approval