claim they are 3000 years old & doctors said that you can alter the shape of the skull but you cannot increase the size of the skull. The skull is genetically predetermined to have a certain volume. Initial DNA analysis of them has revealed th...
claim they are 3000 years old & doctors said that you can alter the shape of the skull but you cannot increase the size of the skull. The skull is genetically predetermined to have a certain volume. Initial DNA analysis of them has revealed that they may not have come from humans, but from a completely new species Whatever the sample labeled 3A has came from – it had mtDNA with mutations unknown in any human, primate or animal known so far. The data are very sketchy though and a LOT of sequencing still needs to be done to recover the complete mtDNA sequence. But a few fragments I was able to sequence from this sample 3A indicate that if these mutations will hold we are dealing with a new human-like creature, very distant from Homo sapiens, Neanderthals and Denisovans. I am not sure it will even fit into the known evolutionary tree. The question is if they were so different, they could not interbreed with humans. Breeding within their small population. they may have degenerated due to inbreeding. That would explain buried children – they were either low or not viable”
Later tests contradicted the earlier results , the Nasca Culture developed directly out of the earlier Paracas Andean culture that existed till 100 BC
DNA without the enzymatic repair mechanisms of living cells has limited chemical stability a large number of postmortem mutations that increasing with time, warmer tropical climates degrade DNA quickly Miscoding of C to T and G to A accounts for the majority of errors DNA can theoretically "survive" under ideal conditions for a million years at 6.8 million years all the bonds would be broken early-1990s claims for real recovered million year-old fossil dna were contaminants,
DNA from bone has a half-life of 521 years & after 2100 years = 4 half lives? = %.94 dna loss = its not inhumanz , its data loss
in Peruvian samples There is no statistically significant difference in cranial capacity between artificially deformed sk..