"They willfully used a known fraudulent study that has as much value as toilet paper, and used that as a basis to revoke access to hydroxychloroquine (HCQ). The second that happened every academic institution, every hospital system in this country, created hurdles and barriers so that their physicians would not use the drug. And if they did, they would be sanctioned or they would lose their job. It was an incredibly damaging move by the FDA. And you need to ask yourself why it was done?
What is an emergency use authorization??? Its a goldmine for pharmaceutical companies. The normal process of FDA approval takes millions of dollars and many years. The FDA creates a pathway in a global emergency --the FDA creates a fast track pathway to circumvent normal testing. That obviously means tremendous profits for the pharmaceutical industry and time saved.
One of the criteria for emergency use approval is there must not be an other treatment-- because if there is a treatment then the normal FDA approval process must be gone through. So the emergency use authorization for HCQ was an impediment for another drug to get an emergency use authorization.
So what happened 4 weeks after the emergency use authorization for HCQ was revoked?? Remdesivir got emergency use authorization and billions of dollars of government orders for this medication.
Based on one small study that showed no reduced mortality with Remdesivir, the drug was approved.
That's problematic.
That's my opinion of the FDA---they use fraudulent material to justify their nefarious actions."
Excerpts, Dr. Vladimir Zelenko talks with author John Leake, July 7, 2021.
-----------------------------------------------
Posted for educative purposes under THE FAIR USE NOTICE: These Videos may contain copyrighted (© ) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior general interest in receiving similar information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode "Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use." Disclaimer: 17 Notwithstanding the Provisions of Sections 17 U.S.C. @ 106 and 17 U.S.C. @ 106A, the Fair Use of a Copyrighted work for Educational Purposes- Not For Profit- Non-Commercial.
