July 3, 2007 Radio Program
Bishop Dolan on baptism, salvation, Fr. Feeney and “Feeneyites.” Hear his own heretical words. Hear a true heretic in action. This is a must-listen if you are familiar with this bishop. This program also discusses other thi…
July 3, 2007 Radio Program
Bishop Dolan on baptism, salvation, Fr. Feeney and “Feeneyites.” Hear his own heretical words. Hear a true heretic in action. This is a must-listen if you are familiar with this bishop. This program also discusses other things.
Baptism of Blood and Baptism of Desire – Erroneous Traditions of Man.
The Catholic Church infallibly teaches that the Sacrament of Baptism is necessary for salvation. It is only through receiving the Sacrament of Baptism that one is incorporated into the Catholic Church, outside of which there is no salvation. The Catholic Church infallibly teaches that the words of Jesus Christ in John 3:5 – Amen, amen I say unto thee, unless a man be born again of water and the Holy Ghost, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God – are to be understood literally: as they are written. This is the infallible teaching of the Church and it excludes any possibility of salvation without being born again of water and the Holy Ghost. However, throughout the history of the Church, many have believed in the theories called baptism of desire and baptism of blood: that one’s desire for the Sacrament of Baptism or one’s martyrdom for the faith supplies for the lack of being born again of water and the Holy Ghost. Those who believe in baptism of blood and baptism of desire raise certain objections to the absolute necessity of receiving the Sacrament of Baptism for salvation.
https://www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com/catholicchurch/cushing-fr-feeney-water-baptism-feeneyite/
False traditionalists and others sometimes refer to true Catholics who believe in the Catholic Church’s teaching on Baptism and the necessity of the Catholic faith for salvation as “Feeneyites”. The charge is utterly false and dishonest. It is a calumny, as the proof and arguments for the true position have nothing to do with Fr. Feeney. Heretics employ the accusation as a dishonest way to divert from the dogmatic facts that refute and convict them. However, the truth is that Fr. Feeney was on the correct side of the pre-Vatican II dispute over this dogma. He defended the dogma Outside the Church There is No Salvation and the necessity of water baptism against the modernist pre-Vatican II ‘clerics’ who were denying it. People who fail to recognize that the denial of this core truth was in full swing in the decades before Vatican II will not see the true nature of the current crisis. They are also more likely to fall prey to the heretical teaching that was circulated in fallible sources before Vatican II, as we’ve explained many times (e.g. in Yes, the Apostasy Began Before Vatican II). The denial of Outside the Church There is No Salvation and the necessity of water baptism by pre-Vatican II modernists was one of the primary causes of the apostasy at Vatican II. One of Feeney’s main enemies during the dispute over this dogma in the years before Vatican II was the ‘Archbishop’ of Boston, ‘Cardinal’ Richard Cushing. This is an interesting new post about the modernist and heretic ‘Cardinal’ Cushing. Understanding what Feeney’s enemy ‘Archbishop’ Cushing believed and stood for provides further insight into which side was Catholic and of God during the aforementioned controversy, and which side was not. The answer: Fr. Feeney was on the correct side.
https://www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com/catholicchurch/beware-sedevacantist-priests-salvation-dogma/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=97b97XseAVE
https://www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com/catholic/why-didnt-fr-feeney-go-to-rome/
https://www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com/catholic_church_salvation_faith_and_baptism.php#BOD
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WZEAUagRP7E
