(No subtitles at the moment - (Any Volunteers?) But READ BELOW!). Uploaded by Benedetto ausGE ( https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCEGNrF7Ex2yGZFkOGX_ZAtg/videos ) on September 24, 2016.
Please read the following, taken from page 52-54 of Gerard Menuhin's* superb book "Tell the Truth and shame the devil" (which you can get in print, or for free online) (*: Menuhin is half-Jewish: the son of the violinist Yehudi Menuhin and dancer Diana Gould, and brother of pianist Jeremy Menuhin (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerard_Menuhin)):
"The full 12-minute recording in which Hermann Schäfer (FDP) and Carlo Schmid (SPD) express their opinions about the legal state of occupied Germany must be listened to carefully, if one is to understand Germany’s post-war development and status today. No peace treaty has yet been signed between Germany and the Allies of WWII; Germany is still categorized as an “enemy state.” The Reich itself did not surrender and never ceased to exist. The Federal Republic of Germany is not the legal successor of the German Reich, so there can never be a peace treaty with the Federal Republic of Germany"
"Probably the most accurate analysis of Germany’s political status is that of parliamentarian, constitutional expert and judge Dr. Carlo Schmid:
This organization of a state-like entity can certainly extend very far. However, what differentiates the construct from genuine democratically legitimated statehood is that it is fundamentally nothing but the organizational form of a modality of foreign domination; for the self-organization taking place despite insufficient freedom presupposes the recognition of foreign power as superior and of greater legitimacy. (September 8, 1948, to the parliamentary council in Bonn)
Carlo Schmid also said: We have time and again stated that Germany consists of the entire territory which the Weimar constitution established as the German national territory in its time. (October 12, 1948) Again, from Carlo Schmid (January 26, 1949):
We are in the process, in Bonn, of discussing and deciding the Basic Law on the basis of which the organization of German national jurisdiction in West Germany will rest. However, we should, in reflecting about this fact, never forget that this Basic Law will only apply within the framework of the Statute of Occupation. This Occupation Statute will under all circumstances act as a kind of superior constitution. . . . We do not therefore know what
will be contained in this Statute of Occupation. However, there have been reports in the media from which we must conclude that it will be much more extensive than we had expected. . . .
Under these circumstances the question arises whether it still makes any sense to resolve a constitution and to distribute it among the German people for ratification. To establish a constitution and on its basis to call into being a government can surely only make sense when parliament and government can assume genuine accountability. . . . How much latitude do we have? One may only assume responsibility according to the measure in which one is free to decide. If this measure is very small, one does not have to summon the apparatus of a constitution to determine the governmental organs which must fulfill it.
............. There is no central Government or authority in Germany capable of accepting responsibility for the maintenance of order, the administration of the country and compliance with the requirements of the victorious Powers. [. . .] The Governments of the United States of America, the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics
and the United Kingdom, and the Provisional Government of the French Republic, hereby assume supreme authority with respect to Germany, including all the powers possessed by the German Government, the High Command and any state, municipal, or local government or authority. The assumption, for the purposes stated
above, of the said authority and powers does not affect the annexation of Germany. (The American Journal of International Law, Vol. 39, No. 3 (July 1945), pp. 171-178)"
Original text from the video:
"Genau genommen sind es die Reden zweier Freimaurer, die einer Loge (Partei) angehören, die wissentlich das deutsche Volk verraten haben!
Das Besatzungsstatut ist heute noch in kraft.
Und wer strebt hier immer wieder Wahlen an und macht auf kosten der Steuerzahler noch teure Wahlkämpfe?
Eben diese Halunken, die in nicht rechtsfähigen Vereinen (Parteien) sind und das deutsche Volk melken!"
ENGLISH MACHINE TRANSLATION:
"Strictly speaking, these are the speeches of two Freemasons who belong to a lodge (party), who knowingly betrayed the German people!
The Occupation Statute is still in force today.
And who is always aiming for elections here and is still making expensive election campaigns at the expense of the taxpayers?
Exactly these scoundrels, who are not in legal associations (parties) and milk the German people!"
