Click to copy, then share by pasting into your messages, comments, social media posts and websites.
Click to copy, then add into your webpages so users can view and engage with this video from your site.
Report Content
We also accept reports via email. Please see the Guidelines Enforcement Process for instructions on how to make a request via email.
Thank you for submitting your report
We will investigate and take the appropriate action.
TL;DR - This Clown Baby Doesn't Understand Numbers and Video Games
A 20 minute video debunking only the first 3 minutes of a video. This one was actually a bit painful for me to do. I may come back and do the rest but I'm concerned that if I have to watch this again I may actually lose the will to live. Nice to see that this Sarkeesian want-to-be has followed in style and disabled all comments and voting though. I wonder if the truth would be too much for her?
Original:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jataYtRiQ_Q
First Study?:
https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=P43HBQAAQBAJ&pg=PT430&lpg=PT430&dq=2010+489+characters+male+female&source=bl&ots=SwAC3jSCXa&sig=74-cLbZzkbyii9u7NDTw27o4J6A&hl=en&sa=X&ei=JirGVISlLYfk7AatiIDQDg&ved=0CCMQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=2010%20489%20characters%20male%20female&f=false
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11199-009-9637-1
Women play games without a character:
http://www.flurry.com/bid/95605/Love-Courtship-and-the-Promiscuous-Male-Mobile-Gamer
Fairplay:
http://www.childrennow.org/uploads/documents/fair_play_2001.pdf
I've baked a cake for you:
http://www.cs.toronto.edu/~rdreezer/I%27ve%20Baked%20A%20Cake%20For%20You.pdf
An interesting blog that looks at the "2010" study in depth:
https://vgresearcher.wordpress.com/2011/04/04/sexy-clothes-and-body-images-in-videogames-downs-smith-2010/
To quickly clarify for those who check the source, yes I am aware that she has a reference list at the end of the video. Please note that in that reference list there are several studies that she cites that are absent, namely the 2001 and 2002 studies mentioned in this video. These are studies that I had to dig up to find the results of, which is funny considering they are somewhat crucial to some of her other studies and points validity.
Please do not contact anyone featured in this video.
Donations are greatly appreciated and enable me to acquire the delicious berries I need to live:
https://www.patreon.com/TealDeer
I sometimes write things/shitpost here:
minds.com/tealdeer
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for fair use for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.
Category | News & Politics |
Sensitivity | Normal - Content that is suitable for ages 16 and over |
Playing Next
Related Videos
TL;DR - Abortion is Sacred [10/Feb/24]
1 month, 2 weeks ago
TL;DR - What People Miss About the Motte & Bailey Fallacy [30/01/24]
1 month, 4 weeks ago
IT'S HAPPENING, IT'S HAPPENING, IT'S OVER - ICEN Special #11 [08/Nov/23]
4 months, 3 weeks ago
TL;DR - How to (Actually) Read [06/Nov/23]
4 months, 3 weeks ago
TL;DR - Candid Shills Getting BTFO with Harmful Opinions [17/Feb/17]
5 months, 3 weeks ago
Warning - This video exceeds your sensitivity preference!
To dismiss this warning and continue to watch the video please click on the button below.
Note - Autoplay has been disabled for this video.