FLAT EARTH TRUTH = 4D Earth Explained & Illustrated

Don't you find it strange that all the flat earth 'leaders' (you know who they are,) not only promote a model they know has serious errors in it, but refuse to discuss or research or come up with a different model?

I'm only interested in what the truth is, and if something fails i move on because i'm not interested in popularity or feeding off a cult, but i know most people aren't like that - they prefer the social comfort of accepting what the majority accept, which is what the leaders manipulate; even if they know in their hearts they haven't really done the proper research for themselves, just like when they were accepting nasa's horse manure as wisdom, they haven't actually changed, just jumped from one cult to another.

Anyway, comments closed, because it is far easier to type a swift one off the wrist and be a dick on the internet than actually email, which anyone can do if they want to give me reasons why 4D can't be true (not vagueness like 'there's no proof!') or if they have a better idea (nothing based on a 1-poled disc model, it also puzzles me that people say, 'it's not the ae projection' but then go on to show a disc model with an ice wall and a circling sun, still with no explanation for the stars or the planetary system, both of which 4D has, though not for why they disappear at high altitude..)

enjoy :-)