The Great Holocaust Trial 1980s Documentary on Ernst Zundel

In this one hour and two minute video, the historic “Great Holocaust Trial” of the 1980s is displayed by the showing of TV reports about this important event. Ernst Zündel had been taken to court in Toronto, Canada by a Zionist, for a number of bogus charges, such as “falsifying” history and “hate crime”. The video shows how a gaggle of Zionists and Communist thugs would physically attack Ernst and his defence team outside the courthouse, when he appeared for the date of the trial to be set. Ernst tells of the abuse and lies he received from Zionists and Communists at the time, and the lack of action by the Canadian Police. The calmness of Ernst, contrasts vividly with the frenzied Zionist and Communist fanatics. If the Zionists and Communists thought that Ernst would crumple under their onslaught of lies and abuse, then they were badly mistaken. Ernst and his defence team took to wearing hard hats and body armour to protect themselves from the physical attacks, and a constant barrage of rocks and missiles. Ernst’s blue hard hat became an icon of the “Great Holocaust Trial”. Failing to intimidate Ernst, by the tactics of physical attacks, lies, and smears, the Zionists and Communists tried to kill Ernst by a pipe bomb at his home. The police, perhaps predictably failed to find the culprits. Douglas Christie acted as the defence lawyer for Ernst, and he did a highly effective job. Douglas began by challenging the jurors, as to whether they were Jews or Freemasons, but not surprisingly the judge failed to allow this as he falsely claimed that these groups were “a large portion of society”. The judge also stated that freedom was not “absolute” in Canada. A policeman who had collected the “evidence” against Ernst was first on the stand, and not surprisingly he turned out to be a Freemason. A Jew named Arnold Freeman, then gave “evidence” which upon cross examination by Douglas, was found to be fraudulent. The Jew falsely claimed that crematorium chimneys gave out masses of smoke, had to admit he had seen no “gassings” and that he didn’t know what happened to other Jews. Then another policeman, testified against Ernst about the charges, and not surprisingly he was another Freemason. A Jewish professor, Raul Hilberg, was cross –examined and found to be wanting. He claimed that Hitler’s gassing order was “verbal”, that he had suppressed lunatic claims in his book and knew of no scientific report to prove “gassings”. Another Jew, Rudolf Vrba, was forced to admit that his evidence was “dramatic” rather than factual. Ernst remarked that the “holocaust” was war propaganda. Eventually, the trial came to a end, and despite the fact Ernst was laughingly convicted by a biased system, the “holocaust” had been dealt a severe blow.