The COVID-19 virus has not been isolated or identified from a scientific standpoint
The CDC document discussed in this video clearly shows that the COVID-19 virus has not been isolated or identified from a scientific standpoint. Therefore, it does not exist, and the PCR tests being used as a diagnostic tool to diagnose case numbers attributed to COVID-19 are invalid.
Update from Dr. Reizer:
I recently received a private email from a medical doctor/surgeon who praised NoFakeNews and the work I have been doing but asked me to be more upfront about the viral isolation of the sars-cov-2 virus.
According to Doctor Adam (not his real name), the CDC does have a method of isolating sars-cov-2 somewhere on their website. Dr. Adam also explained that Pubmed.gov has two papers on CoV isolation.
Dr. Adam explained to me that although my little video presentation on NoFakeNews highlighting the fact that in June 2020, the CDC had no viral isolates of sars-cov-2 in its possession was technically accurate at the time, it is now claimed within the scientific community that sars-cov-2 isolates are available from the ATCC.org and the same organization regularly sells the viral particles.
Additionally, Dr. Adam informed me about two pharmaceutical companies — Sinovac and Sinopharm — that make traditional attenuated viral vaccines for sars-cov-2.
Dr. Adam wanted me to answer what was in those attenuated sars-cov-2 vaccines.
I have no idea, Dr. Adam, what is in those attenuated traditional vaccines. But I can tell you for sure what is not in those products — sars-cov-2 viral isolates!
Let me preface my response to the above-referenced claims by writing the following:
The fact that the world’s biggest pandemic in modern history only has two scientific articles published that discuss the viral pathogen’s isolation is mind-boggling!
In June 2020, well into the plandemic, the CDC and all other global health regulatory agencies could not produce sars-cov-2 viral isolates. This fact speaks volumes about the scientific fraud that was well underway at that point.
A viral isolate is a pure microbial or viral sample that must be obtained from an infected individual and not grown in a laboratory setting. In other words, a true viral isolate must be taken or extracted from a human or animal host and purified.
According to the sources I converse with, no scientists have done this procedure with regards to sars-cov-2. What they have done instead is gather a scant number of genomic sequences (“viral particles”) from a patient allegedly infected with COVID-19 and decided by a committee that these structures were the identified virus and proceeded to label them as viral isolates. This practice is the scientific community’s idea of viral isolation. I think it’s junk science!
Next, the same mainstream science community used PCR technology to confirm the diagnostic identification of the alleged COVID-19 disease within humans.
PCR testing cannot be used to confirm the presence of sars-cov-2 in humans, nor can it be used to verify the existence of any viral pathogens, in my opinion. That fact alone presents a significant problem for medical science, especially when we examine the history of infectious diseases and how prominent a role viruses have played within that false narrative.
Virtually every virus known to modern science is routinely diagnosed in animals and humans by a diagnostic technology incapable of providing an accurate result. The technology’s creator, Kary Mullis, is on the record stating this claim.
In my opinion, there’s no sars-cov-2 virus. It hasn’t been appropriately isolated. There’s so much scientific fraud taking place; it’s hard to believe that any recent claims of viral isolates existing are valid.
Predictably, the health regulatory agencies would react and publish a couple of token papers that allege the sars-cov-2 virus has been isolated. They are trying to maintain the appearance of having some semblance of credibility in the eyes of “the knowledgeable people” who still believe in their dogma.
The plandemic scam was preplanned for many years, and science-minded people want to believe that a novel viral pathogen happened to come along right on cue or that one was released from a gain of function laboratory in China.
If either one of those two scenarios were remotely possible, which they are not, why would the science fiction story writers need to have a rigged diagnostic test to make the disease appear real on paper? If the sars-cov-2 virus were real and as menacing a viral pathogen as advertised, we would undoubtedly have witnessed the dead piling up on the streets. We would have observed a real pandemic taking place instead of living through the manufactured “casedemic” created solely from false-positive PCR results!
|Category||Health & Medical|
|Sensitivity||Normal - Content that is suitable for ages 16 and over|
Warning - This video exceeds your sensitivity preference!
To dismiss this warning and continue to watch the video please click on the button below.
Note - Autoplay has been disabled for this video.
This advertisement has been selected by the videos creator, Johnreizer01.
This advertisement has been selected by the BitChute platform.
By purchasing and/or using the linked product you are helping to cover the costs of running BitChute.
It is free for anyone to opt-out of receiving advertising via the Interface tab on the Settings page.
To help support BitChute or find out more about our creator monetization policy: