"When I tried to publish the paper, it was blocked. I realized medicine is hopelessly politicized."
Later, he says, "The most sensitive part of his body rubbing against clothing for the rest of his life."
To clarify, it would be like the eyeball rubbing against clothing. It quickly becomes callused and the body stops getting irritated by it. However, the glans itself is only protopathic. The more sophisticated nerves are in the amputated foreskin.
This is quite a long upload, so I can't guarantee there aren't further errors in the remainder. I'm only 13 minutes into it.
For example, he calls the head of the penis highly erogenous, and that's not what the science shows. Even when in perfect condition, the glans penis is not technically erogenous. It functions as a slick, wet piston for the snakelike foreskin apparatus, which is where the rich erogenous nerves exist.
Dr. Tinari's story is that he was forcibly mutilated as a child, so he never got a chance to appreciate what was amputated.
Likewise, he doesn't really know what he's talking about comparing the eyelid to the foreskin. They have similarities, but the foreskin is highly sexual tissue, and the eyelid just covers the eye. On the other hand, he's more informed than most.
Lawrence Newman says, "Forced genital mutilation of males is no different than forced genital mutilation of females. It has been proven via histological analysis that essentially all the erogenous nerves of the penis are located in the ridged band and frenular delta of the foreskin, both of which are cut off. I was circumcised for pseudomedical reasons by the NHS in the UK when I was 14 and it destroyed my sexual pleasure completely. The glans penis is almost non-erogenous in character. It's like the eyeball--covered in crude free nerves that detect pain and pressure. That's all the circumcised man's left with. Unfortunately many people have bought the baseless folk theory that the glans penis and glans clitoris are the primary sexual organs. This is untrue and no histological evidence exists to back this up.
Forced circumcision is the most disgusting, despicable act you could do to someone. It's objectively worse than rape--it is non-consensual but it is also irreversible and damages you for life. I have PTSD/depression over it and have sworn off women because sex is pointless. Imagine how many boys and men commit suicide, get depression/PTSD or end up murdering people due to this horrific crime."
He also says, "Male circumcision has always been about sexual suppression of males. And circumcised men have lost the most sensitive parts of their penis. Where is your evidence they enjoy sex? Because these men have sex, can get erection ergo they must enjoy it? No, these men have never known what foreskin feels like. I can tell you, having experienced both, that circumcision kills pleasure dead. A woman's glans clitoris is a small part of her sexual apparatus and she can enjoy sex without it via penetrative sex. A man without a foreskin can't enjoy sex because he has no ridge band and frenular delta. The glans penis is virtually sexually insensitive. IGNORANCE."
Share any valuable thoughts and insights.
