First published at 03:28 UTC on November 9th, 2019.
Copied from https://youtu.be/n2VKdga80aU
"In R. Isaac's eyes, Christian men were sexual supermen, who could pleasure their women to a degree far beyond the capacities of Jewish men, and who could do so far more often. If virility were to …
MORE
Copied from https://youtu.be/n2VKdga80aU
"In R. Isaac's eyes, Christian men were sexual supermen, who could pleasure their women to a degree far beyond the capacities of Jewish men, and who could do so far more often. If virility were to be defined in terms of sexual prowess, Jewish men would fail miserably, because their circumcision has rendered them incapable of pleasuring their women."
From the same source: "The sexual inadequacy of the circumcised man, implicit in the Midrash on Genesis and in Maimonides, becomes explicit in R. Isaac."
Shaye J. D. Cohen, p 156 of Why Aren't Jewish Women Circumcised?: Gender and Covenant in Judaism. 2005.
Lawrence Newman again:
"Male circumcision is more sexually damaging than FGM. More tissue is excised, more nerves are lost, more functionality is lost. The foreskin has been PROVEN to be the primary sexual tissue with almost all pleasurable properties because the glans has virtually no fine touch reception, mostly protopathic sensitivity [i.e. pressure]. By a simple process of elimination, we can deduce that the foreskin is the hub of pleasure."
Also see "Sex & Circumcision: An American Love Story by Eric Clopper" https://www.bitchute.com/video/z1BvVis22AfW/
LESS