Rough transcript of first ten minutes of video (continued in comments section):
For many decades, the dollar has been the reserve currency. The system is what I would describe as "long in the tooth". The central bankers are trying to bring in a new system, but it's not ready to go yet. We're in a period of great change and uncertainty where the central bankers are trying to keep the dollar system going and to accelerate bringing in the new system, and they have to bring in the new system without people quite realising exactly what it is. We've had a global reserve currency - the dollar - which needs to evolve and change. Because they're trying to extend the old and accelerate the new, it makes for a chaotic thing since much of the new is being tested and prototyped and involves many different industries. I describe the new system as the end of currencies. We're not bringing in a new currency, but a new transaction system that will be all digital and essentially end currencies as we know them.
It's big, complicated and messy, and the challenge they have is how do you market a system that, if people understood, nobody would want? Of course, the way you do that is with a healthcare crisis.
Generally, if a few people want to control the many, the question is how do you herd all the sheep into the slaughterhouse without them realising and resisting? The perfect thing is invisible enemies. We had the "war on terrorism" with invisible terrorists, and now we have a virus, which is perfect. You can't prove it doesn't exist because it's invisible. So invisible enemies are always the preferred ones because if you can introduce significant fear, people will need government to protect them from the invisible enemy. [The arsonist gets to sweep in and save the day by masquerading as the fire fighter. The difference here is that the fire is imaginary.]
The second tactic, which is very effective, is divide and conquer. The media plays a very important role here. Its goal is to turn men and women against each other and black and white against each other. One of the reasons you import a lot of immigrants into Europe is to turn the general population against the immigrants and then you need government to be in the middle. Whether it's divide and conquer or invisible enemies, these are all ways to institute fear and get people to go along with things. The invisible virus facilitates enormous control mechanisms. You can stop people from gathering, organising, getting together and talking about what's going on. If you digitise it with contact tracing you can control who's talking to whom. If you can get them to do all their work and education online, you can literally listen to everything they're saying. So you can institute extraordinary amounts of surveillance using the pretext that you're protecting people from an invisible virus. It's very clever. As you can see, it's working with many people, although not everyone.
Essentially, what you're trying to do is get people to buy into a solution before they see where it's all ultimately going to go. You're talking about a transaction system which is no longer currency, it's a control system. It's like credit at the company store. If every central bank comes out with a digital currency, they have the ability to turn your money on and off. So if you don't behave, that's it!
The purpose of lockdown is to dramatically centralise economic and political control. Let me give you an example: we have 100 small businesses on Main Street in a community. You declare them non-essential, shut them down and suddenly Amazon, Walmart and the big-box stores can come in and take away the entire market share. In the meantime, the people on Main Street have to keep paying off their credit cards or their mortgage, so they're in a debt entrapment. They're desperate to get cashflow to cover their debts and their day-to-day expenses. The Federal Reserve institutes a form of quantitative easing where they're buying corporate bonds and the guys who are taking up the market share can basically finance at 0.1% whereas everyone on Main Street is paying 16-17% of their credit cards without income. So now you've got the small businesses over a barrel and you can take away their market share.
Video source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C1-0XKYAZII&ab_channel=TruthMatters
