MORE
Copied from https://www.tiktok.com/@danielrold/video/7229464993811549486
Stupid as well thinking any women are cut for men's pleasure. The thought of a lover having mutilated genitalia is sickening. No one who cares about their lover delights in seeing the scars and results of genital mutilation. From what I've looked into regarding FGM, it's older mutilated women pushing it on the next generation to cripple them like themselves. With an understanding of typical human nature, that makes sense. See the book: "Envy: A Theory of Social Behavior" by Helmut Schoeck.
Lawrence Newman writes:
"The foreskin is where all the erogenous sensation/nerves are. The glans is non-erogenous; it's protopathic like the eye, i.e. it senses pain and pressure. Circumcision was invented to sexually suppress, just like FGM. And it was adopted by Western doctors to do just that. Histological analysis has proven what I'm saying. I was cut like you unnecessarily in my teens (there was no valid reason for you to have had your foreskin cut off) and it took away all my sensation and gave me ED. Unfortunately, the medical industry is keeping quiet about the brutal reality of circumcision damage. Most circumcised men were mutilated as babies or in prepubescence and so never know their penis is abnormal. Just like most victims of FGM do not see it as sexually damaging. We're all being lied to about this. Male genital mutilation is the biggest human rights abuse in the Western world right now."
Doctors, Be Warned: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4757-3351-8_16
"The Convention on the Rights of the Child, Article 24, clearly condemns medical practices that are harmful to children. Amongst these, male circumcision constitutes one of the egregious examples, and the Convention clearly indicates that a harmful practice cannot be justified on tradition, religious, or ethnic grounds. What is particularly noxious about the practice is that it usually takes place without the consent of the child. Australian Law has already reached the position where it has been held that parental consent to an irreversible non-therapeutic operation is not sufficient to justify doctors in performing it. This presentation will argue that doctors have been put on notice that they are taking a huge risk in performing this operation. They are vulnerable to legal action by the child."
Peaceful Parenting: http://www.drmomma.org/
Acroposthion: http://acroposthion.com/
In Memory of the Sexually Mutilated Child: https://thorium.rocks/misc/sexuallymutilatedchild.org/index.htm
Sex As Nature Intended It: http://www.sexasnatureintendedit.com/
Saving Our Sons: http://www.savingsons.org/
LaurieSees: https://www.bitchute.com/profile/8tyHDChlkYlT/
