Mr. Prager retired in 2005 and has published over 100 books since then. Some are located at www.independent.academia.edu/Prager and they are all free.
COVID-19 References:
1. Dr. Mike Yeadon, former Vice President & Chief Science Officer for Pfizer (16 years), states:
“"there is no science to suggest a second wave should happen." The "Big Pharma" insider asserts that false positive results from inherently unreliable COVID tests are being used to manufacture a "second wave" based on "new cases."
"A major component our immune systems is the group of white blood cells called T-cells whose job it is to memorise a short piece of whatever virus we were infected with so the right cell types can multiply rapidly and protect us if we get a related infection. Responses to COVID-19 have been shown in dozens of blood samples taken from donors before the new virus arrived."
"It is now established that at least 30% of our population already had immunological recognition of this new virus, before it even arrived...COVID-19 is new, but coronaviruses are not."
"...epidemiological studies show that, with the extent of prior immunity that we can now reasonably assume to be the case, only 15-25% of the population being infected is sufficient to bring the spread of the virus to a halt..."
"...a true positive does not necessarily indicate the presence of viable virus. In limited studies to date, many researchers have shown that some subjects remain PCR-positive long after the ability to culture virus from swabs has disappeared. We term this a ‘cold positive’ (to distinguish it from a ‘hot positive’, someone actually infected with intact virus).
Former Chief Science Officer for Pfizer Says "Second Wave" Faked on False-Positive COVID Tests, "Pandemic is Over"
Former Chief Science Officer for Pfizer Says "Second Wave" Faked on Fals...
2. Illinois Department of Public Health Director Dr. Ngozi Ezike explains how CV deaths are counted
Illinois Department of Public Health Director Dr. Ngozi Ezike explains how CV deaths are counted
Illinois Department of Public Health Director Dr. Ngozi Ezike explains h...
3. The History Of The Global Vaccination Program In 1000 Peer Reviewed Reports & Studies, Jeff Prager, 1,053 pages:
The History Of The Global Vaccination Program In 1000 Peer Reviewed Reports And Studies
The History Of The Global Vaccination Program In 1000 Peer Reviewed Repo...
1000 peer reviewed reports on vaccination, many of which will likely surprise you.
4. ASIA, Autoimmune/Inflammatory Syndrome Induced By Adjuvants, Jeff Prager, 105 pages: “The media claims vaccination is a safe and sound medical science. The peer reviewed literature tells a different story entirely. It’s a story of a continuing collection of new discoveries in immunity, autoimmunity, brain chemistry, neurology, virology and vaccinology and including a number of other specialties. Aluminum and mercury injected into the human body are both only recently being investigated by the scientific community for safety and all of the issues surrounding injecting either of these metals are still largely unknown. Vaccination is a science being applied to each and every one of us very, very liberally and especially so with the vaccine schedule currently approved here in the USA. And we are the single most vaccinated population, by far, on earth. Yet we also have some of the highest rates in the world for the 24 primary and nearly 100 total autoimmune diseases. The peer review explains why.”
https://www.academia.edu/36597398/Autoimmune_Syndromes_and_Inflammatory_Syndromes_Caused_By_Adjuvants_In_Vaccines
5. “With a series of worked examples for a notional population of 100,000 people, we show that even test systems with a high specificity can yield a large number of false positive results, especially where the population prevalence is low. For example, at a true population prevalence of 5%, using a test with 99% sensitivity and specificity, 16% of positive results will be false and thus 950 people will be incorrectly informed they have had the infection.”
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32590234/
6. “In brief, a negative RT-PCR nasopharyngeal swab test is insufficient to rule out COVID-19. Thus, over-reliance on the results of the test may be dangerous, and the push for widespread testing may be overstated.”
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32302278/
7. “This overview aims to compare and contrast the similarities and differences of these three major episodes of coronavirus outbreak, and conclude that they are essentially the same viral respiratory syndromes caused by similar strains of coronavirus with different names.
