Einstein Lied about the Ether in Space - Pete Papaherakles

Brian Ruhe and Pete Papaherakles speculate at that Albert Einstein was part of an int'l Jewish conspiracy to mislead the world into believing that the ether does not exist and that space is a vacuum. Ether is a subtle substance in outer space so space is not a vacuum as Einstein insisted. The intention here is to make fake physics so that the Jewish elite understand true physics and science and the world does not. This keeps the goy stupid.
Pete Papaherakles joined me Dec. 20, 2017 back in our early days when we were young and good looking fighters. Pete is the wise godfather who has earned much respect with his playlist of videos on this channel at: https://www.bitchute.com/playlist/3U7qDqfXKIq7/
Pete Papaherakles has written hundreds of articles for American Free Press and the Barnes Review. You can email Pete at [email protected] . The original video had only 376 views at: The Evil Dream Team - Marx, Freud & Einstein, 1:06:00 long at:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/nBT3raRr52we/?list=9w2zisrKOAKd&randomize=false
Thanks to Fred for video editing this series of three.
Brent Harrington at: [email protected] emailed to me after seeing this video and wrote:
Hi Brian, I just watched your video
Pete Papaherakles on the Ether in Space, Einstein & Tesla
I agree that space is a thing. I have been saying that for decades. It appears to me that there was a conspiracy to promote relativity and suppress ether theory. I believe the reason Einstein never received the Nobel prize for relativity is because of the work of Dayton Miller. Dayton miller was performing experiments that were demonstrating relative motion or motion relative to space.
Einstein himself believed that space was a thing. All he said was that you cannot measure your motion relative to space.
Albert Einstein gave an address on 5 May 1920 at the University of Leiden. He chose as his topic Ether and the Theory of Relativity.
The lecture was published by Methuen & Co. Ltd, London, in 1922.
"Recapitulating, we may say that according to the general theory of relativity space is endowed with physical qualities; in this sense, therefore, there exists an ether. According to the general theory of relativity space without ether is unthinkable; for in such space there not only would be no propagation of light, but also no possibility of existence for standards of space and time (measuring-rods and clocks), nor therefore any space-time intervals in the physical sense. But this ether may not be thought of as endowed with the quality characteristic of ponderable media, as consisting of parts which may be tracked through time. The idea of motion may not be applied to it."
My opinion is that space is a thing. Accelerating a mass relative to space creates a force on that mass called inertia. Accelerating space relative to a mass creates a force on that mass called gravity.
Gravity on Earth is caused by space accelerating towards the Earth. Any mass near the Earth would be subject to accelerating space and would have an inertial force induced upon it. The mass would accelerate until it's rate of acceleration matched the acceleration rate of space and would then be at rest with space and have no forces acting on it, until it hit the ground at which time it will again be accelerating relative to space and have an inertial force induced upon it.
Any mass on the Earth's surface would have a velocity relative to space and a mass's time depends on it's velocity relative to space, therefore the time of any mass on the Earth's surface would be affected.
Any light passing near the Earth would be traveling through space that is moving towards the Earth and therefore that light would appear to have a curved path.
For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction but what they do not tell you is that the reaction speed is limited by the speed of light. There is a lag between the action and the reaction, otherwise the action/reaction would happen at the same time and cancel each other out and nothing could ever happen or exist.
When I push on a mass in space it pushes back against me with an equal and opposite force but because of the lag between my applied force and the induced force (inertia), the mass will begin to accelerate. As the velocity of the mass, relative to space, increases, the lag between the applied force and the induced force becomes shorter. When the lag becomes shorter, the mass's rate of acceleration decreases, this is interpreted as an increase in mass but is an increase in inertia. At the speed of light the applied force and the induced force happen at the same time, acceleration stops and there is no time.
Time is the "time" between the action and the reaction or the period of the frequency. Time does not slow down, there is just less time or no time.
There is no independent reality. Things do not just exist. There are no little hard things that just exist.