First published at 11:23 UTC on September 21st, 2019.
Understanding that the danger of existence is in being SUBJECT to impermanence, being SUBJECT to change and BEFORE the actual change occurs.
- IMPERMANENCE is about a fundamental lack of control, not about "observing" how "everything…
MORE
Understanding that the danger of existence is in being SUBJECT to impermanence, being SUBJECT to change and BEFORE the actual change occurs.
- IMPERMANENCE is about a fundamental lack of control, not about "observing" how "everything is constantly changing".
- How does 'lack of control' regarding one's own life feel?
- Is what is fearful pleasant or unpleasant?
- Hence, "anicca" is ALWAYS unpleasant (dukkha).
- Would that which is inherently inconceivable to control, a thoroughly independent and "unownable" thing, and fearfully unpleasant - would it be possible to regard that thing as "dear", "friendly" and desirable to and for oneself? Would it be possible to regard that thing as "mine"?
That "thing" is: your own body, your own feelings, your own senses, your own mind.
-----------------------------------------------------------
If you wish to gift your support to life at the Hillside you would be very welcome to do so by donating at:
http://www.hillsidehermitage.org/support-us
For other forms of Dhamma Teachings see:
http://www.hillsidehermitage.org/teachings
For the Buddhist Phenomenology essays see:
http://www.hillsidehermitage.org/teachings/writings/
LESS