Neil Armstrong Setting Foot On The Moon Is Proof That We Didn't Go There In 1969

What strikes you as odd in the widely distributed image of Neil Armstrong setting foot on the moon? It's obvious to me now, but it took me 53 years to get a clue. How about you? When film is shot, there is a film director and a cameraman. This was a stage and the production was a fictional movie. The radiation on the moon would kill an astronaut, because the moon has no magnetic field, as the earth does. We are told how lucky we are to have a magnetic field on the earth to deflect all the deadly radiation. The moon has no magnetic field and therefore has no protection for astronauts. Is your belief that we landed men on the moon based on science or fiction? Why don't Neil deGrasse Tyson, Michio Kaku and Bill Nye, the Science Guy field real questions, anchored in science? Is it because they are paid liars? If they took bribes and that gets out, what does that do to their reputations? Why did Buzz Aldrin get violent with Bart Sibrel when he was asked to put his hand on the holy Bible and swear that he walked on the moon? Why the violent reaction? Was he threatened somehow? If so, how? If he actually walked on the moon, he puts his hand on the Bible and swears and it's over! No conflict! No violence! The truth hurts and Sibrel called Buzz Aldrin a liar and a coward and that part is true, so Aldrin punched Sibrel in the face, because the truth came out and Buzz Aldrin could not face the facts. Truth has a way of bleeding through and no matter how many shirts of lies you wear, the blood comes through, anyway! A hard punch in the face does not make the truth go away. The truth remains like bedrock, after the rains of time have washed away all the dirty lies! Pensions are protected by not talking, but the truth is discovered, anyway