Anything has a cause ....here is how it was and is being done
Please do not miss out my comment- not only here but especially under this post
You will see at the bottom of the research of these books the problem of racial family bloodlines and how they might have act in exclusive selfinterests and not based on any kind of other moral standards. In so far as the Kings and Queens and other Aristocracies might not have been Jews themselves (what should be considered as a possibility) they also used their strong family bloodlines to rule over the rest of the kinsmens by getting most out of it, so to speak. The so called Landlords in the Monarchies had peasants who had to give them corn and what have you in order to get protected by the knights of the Monarchs. They also had to pay for rent either with money or with "corn".
Some people in Germany are seriously discussing at the moment if we should not call upon our former Monarchs to restore the German Empire (which never died but was left alone from Emperor Wilhelmine II (also King of Prussia) who fled the country (1918) ) and neither overhanded the Crown to anyone at home nor finished the ordered "State of Siege". So the Germans would remain under Militairy Command. This overrules all the local counties, 26 in numbers of which "das Deutsche Reich"was built as an Alliance. So, Germans had actually not been Germans alone but par example Saxons (homeland) and Germans or Prussians (homeland) and Germans. The Alliance did not withdraw the kinsmen-ship or the tribal origins of the folks but the title "Deutscher" was added. So any kinsman among that alliance could settle in another tribal county, if he so chosed and do his business over there. The Alliance made the single principalities of course more safe ....well, I do not know, if that is so true.
So as though we "Deutsche" know meanwhile that going back into the legal means of the Weimarer Republic (based on Admiral Law and Cooperations largely owned by Jews) is not a good idea, we are confused and divided about the lawful status of the National Socialists as latest holders of the Country in the bounderies of 1937.
Hitler, those days, tried to get overhanded the Kingship or something (probably the Militairy Leadership during the State of Siege - because of the ongoing WWI, which was never ended by a Peace Treaty. Remember the Versaille Treaty had only been an Armistide) from Kaiser Wilhelm II, but WilhelmII refused. He might have had good reasons for that as Hitler had been a Catholic and probably was running under them.
The German Empire (1871) was free from the Vatican and who really would have wanted to get back to them who are claiming to be chosen by God to rule mankind (can´t you see that jewish mindset in that?). Protestantismus had been coming out of the northern part of Germany and the Netherlands by Luther and Calvin and this finally broke the so called Holy Roman Empire of German Nations into 2 and more pieces. The Austrian Habsburgs remained with the Vaticanos. The Nordic people though got out of it in 1871 under the leadership of Bismarck.
If the German people would have known the Vatican Connection of the National Socialists they probably had had more doubts towards the National Socialists. Little did they know but Hunger and the "Golden Age" for the Jews during the horrific times of the Weimarer Republic. So we do not really know what had been the Motivations of Emperor Wilhelm II not to give the leadership of the State of Siege to Hitler. But as our ancestors had been left alone from the Monarch they were somehow outlawed, unable to operate the System because there were no appointed heir nor otherwise lawful "acting head" ...unless Adolf Hitler but who was elected through the illegal System of the Weimarer Republic, meaning the Cooperation by the Occupiers of the Empire. So, things were pretty much interwoven with different Branches among the Elites.... nowadays also called the "deep State". The Vaticanos hold themselves lots of "orders" just like the Freemasons ....the Knights of Malta and so fort.
However, if you read the given sources you find not only the basic problem with the strongest family bloodline who might come to the idea to turn against their own kinsmen by exploiting them but also to the problem that all the European Aristocrats had been in this or that way related. It had been their way of forming Allies ...against who? That is here the question, isn`it. WWI usually could have never happened because the fighting "country.men" were ruled by the related Aristocrats. Kaiser Wilhelm II was the grandson of Queen Victoria and the Cousin of the Zar of Russia. Can you see the problem? We will have to find and visualize better Systems which provide the tribal kinsmen with the harvest of their deeds.
|Sensitivity||Normal - Content that is suitable for ages 16 and over|
3 days, 4 hours ago
Warning - This video exceeds your sensitivity preference!
To dismiss this warning and continue to watch the video please click on the button below.
Note - Autoplay has been disabled for this video.
This advertisement has been selected by the BitChute platform.
By purchasing and/or using the linked product you are helping to cover the costs of running BitChute. Without the support of the community this platform will cease to exist.
Registered users can opt-out of receiving advertising via the Interface tab on their Settings page.
To help support BitChute, place an advert on BitChute or find out more about our creator monetization policy: