Well, what a surprise - NOT! It turns out that Tory and opposition party MPs got assurances from EU leaders that they would get this surrender bill Article 50 extension.
PLEASE SUPPORT MY YOUTUBE WORK ON PATREON: http://bit.ly/2oUVQfm
OR ON SUBSCRIBESTAR: https://www.subscribestar.com/jeff-taylor
My Youtube Community Page: https://goo.gl/tpTxpt
FACEBOOK: @JeffTaylorBrexit
LIKE THIS? PLEASE SHARE IT using the url - https://youtu.be/bTQs44xSTys
*SUBSCRIBE* to Jeff Taylor Here: https://goo.gl/NyzUPo
How to *SUPERCHARGE* your YouTube videos - start for FREE: http://bit.ly/2vbl9z2
PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING MAY NOT BE A FULL TRANSCRIPT!!
The Times says that it understands that those MPs talked to the EU Council before they went ahead with their plan, to make sure that they would get what they put into that surrender bill.
And The Times says that one of these MPs said that it was not a case that they thought they'd get the extension, that MP said they knew they would get it.
The group of MPs also claim that the bill is 95% legally watertight and that they are geared up to take the Prime Minister to court to enforce the law.
So, a group of nameless elected politicians, went and negotiated the change to an international treaty with the heads of 27 foreign powers without the sanction of either the UK head of state, the Queen, nor with the permission of the UK head of Government, the Prime Minister, Boris Johnson.
They then returned and engaged in framing a law based on those negotiations. Then, with the help of a compliant Speaker, John Bercow and a very helpful House of Lords, they pushed through a law based on those, what I would call 'unlawful', negotiations.
I say 'unlawful' because as far as I can tell as a laymen, according to a parliamentary paper on the royal war prerogative, engaging in foreign affairs is the exclusive realm of the executive, that is, the government.
And I'll further back this up by pointing to the furore that was unleashed when Nigel..
