MORE
Real quick - just popped up this old piece: https://gm-no.blogspot.com/2016/01/justice-for-john-giuca.html
Before I became a crusader for the cause of eradicating GMOs from our lives, I remarked on a number of topics; chief among them, the events of September 11, 2001. I was actually a favorite of Arianna Huffington until these pieces began to crop up in my writings. Another subject was what I perceived to be flawed justice, and among my many personages were John Kennedy O'Hara, Judge John "The Kung-Fu Judge" Phillips, and John Giuca.
I am a personal friend of Doreen Giuliano. That being said, it doesn't change the facts of the story. I met her not long before Christopher Ketcham penned his Vanity Fair piece, Mother Justice. I have stayed in contact with her, and I still cannot make sense of as to why John Giuca still languishes behind prison walls. Here's a PDF of the piece.
http://www.christopherketcham.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/Mother%20Justice,%20Vanity%20Fair,%20Jan-%202009.pdf
What will follow this is a piece I penned a couple of years ago.
...
So...let's see. We have, in this case:
Violation of voir dire (In the United States, it now generally refers to the process by which prospective jurors are questioned about their backgrounds and potential biases before being chosen to sit on a jury. "Voir Dire is the process by which attorneys select, or perhaps more appropriately reject, certain jurors to hear a case."[5] It also refers to the process by which expert witnesses are questioned about their backgrounds and qualifications before being allowed to present their opinion testimony in court. As noted above, in the United States (especially in practice under the Federal Rules of Evidence), voir dire can also refer to examination of the background of a witness to assess their qualification or fitness to give testimony on a given subject.[6])
Perjury by a false witness (forgive me if these aren't strictly legal terms)
Failure to fully vet possible alternate perpetrators (see the screen maps above)
Violation of Brady vs. Maryland (Brady evidence also includes evidence material to credibility of a civilian witness, such as evidence of false statements by the witness or evidence that a witness was paid to act as an informant.[5])
There's plenty more where that came from...but my point remains that any one of the above is grounds for an appeal, if not for throwing out the verdict entirely. Hopefully, Justice Danny Chun comes to realize this, as well.
Suffice it to say...when justice is abrogated, EVIL MULTIPLIES
