Dr. David E. Martin Explaining The 5th Circuit Court Decision Ending Vaccine Mandate
Digileak News Not Noise - Feb 1, 2023 - Video 46 min
WORLD FEB - Slide 58 - Employers May NOT Coerce Employees. It Is A FELONY!
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1ZBYOPEgQeXxCNZFJFsstnWMPaR3yh4DFbRBqIVszIFo/edit#slide=id.g2033a7748eb_0_38
Mirror: Progressive Truth Seekers
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1ZBYOPEgQeXxCNZFJFsstnWMPaR3yh4DFbRBqIVszIFo/edit#slide=id.g2033a7748eb_0_38
Jan. 6, 2022
Employers May NOT Coerce Employees. It Is A FELONY!
Dr. David E. Martin on Activate Humanity Show explaining the 5th Circuit Court decision ending Vaccine Mandate…
5th Circuit Court of Appeals, in shutting down OSHA mandates, also challenged the validity of the pandemic and government restrictions.
Not only did the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals shut down the OSHA workplace mandates, but the court also challenged the validity of the pandemic and all subsequent emergency orders and physical restrictions that governments have imposed under its premise.
On page 10, the court states: “The natural first step in enacting a lawful ETS (emergency temporary standard) is to show that employees covered by the ETS are in fact exposed to the dangerous substances, agents, or hazards at issue—here, COVID-19.”
OSHA cannot prove that covid-19 represents a “grave danger” to everyone in the workplace
The court affirmed the definition of emergency temporary standards, that they “are an unusual response to exceptional circumstances.” Throughout history, the courts have unilaterally ruled that OSHA’s authority under § 655(c) is an “extraordinary power” that should be “limited” and “delicately exercised.” In other words, OSHA cannot flagrantly establish emergency temporary standards, and the agency cannot be used as a political weapon to force people to give up their body autonomy for some concocted idea of “safety.”
Therefore, the 5th Circuit Court of appeals ruled that the Biden administration’s vaccine, mask and PCR testing mandate (with all its threats of coercion and extortion) are “anything but a “delicate exercise” of this “extraordinary power.”
“Quite the opposite, rather than a delicately handled scalpel, the Mandate is a one-size-fits-all sledgehammer that makes hardly any attempt to account for differences in workplaces (and workers) that have more than a little bearing on workers’ varying degrees of susceptibility to the supposedly ‘grave danger’ the Mandate purports to address,” the court ruled.
OSHA cannot prove that exposure to airborne viruses is a workplace hazard, when exposure is the key to immunity
The Department of Labor and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) failed to properly define “covid-19” and prove that all employees are in “grave danger” to a new causative agent. Under OSHA’s own rules (Int’l Chem. Workers, 830 F.2d at 371), the agency cannot propose a new ETS if the agency is unable to properly identify and isolate a substance of “grave danger’ at such levels that warrant hazardous exposure in the workplace.
Link To 5th Circuit Court Decision: https://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/21/21-60845-CV0.pdf
https://www.naturalnews.com/2022-01-06-5th-circuit-shuts-down-osha-mandates.html
