Despite 'Pull-Out', US Still Fund Taliban Via Pakistan's ISI New NATO Israel War Looms? Tony Gosling
In October 2006, NATO clearly identified the Taliban as an ISI operation:
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/1530756/Natos-top-brass-accuse-Pakistan-over-Taliban-aid.html
Wikileak documents reveal that Pakistan has been funding the Taliban.
https://wikileaksinpakistan.blogspot.com/2011/09/wikileaks-pakistan-accused-of-helping.html
"The Taliban are stronger than ever and a crucial component of their success is the support they receive from Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI). The military spy agency nurtured the Taliban in the 1990s and has maintained ties to the group ever since."
And guess who has been funding Pakistan and the ISI to the tune of billions of dollars? Billions of which "go missing?"
Just two weeks ago, Hillary Clinton announced millions more. Obama officials say the US-Pakistani relationship will not be harmed by these revelations.
Of course not. The goyim must continue to destroy themselves in Afghanistan.
Pakistani support for the Taliban is spun in terms of rivalry with India. In fact, the Pakistani Interservices Intelligence Agency takes its orders from the CIA, and the CIA is run by the Illuminati bankers.
http://www.newsweek.com/2009/10/21/about-those-billions.html
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/feb/27/pakistan.usa
http://www.newsweek.com/2009/10/21/about-those-billions.html
Wikileaks: Pakistan accused of helping Taliban in Afghanistan attacks
Pakistan has armed, trained and coordinated Taliban and al-Qaeda attacks in Afghanistan, according to the military reports.
Western officials suspect Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence agency retains links with militants to gain influence in the region.
They are thought to have collaborated with terrorist leaders to order suicide bombings over the last six years.
Vehicles were allegedly filled with explosives in Pakistan before being driven across the border into Afghanistan, sometimes with ISI collusion.
John Kerry, the head of the Foreign Relations Committee in the US Senate, said the leak was worrying and had come at a "critical stage" for policy in the region.
"These documents may very well underscore the stakes and make the calibrations needed to get the policy right more urgent," he said.
"However illegally these documents came to light, they raise serious questions about the reality of America's policy toward Pakistan and Afghanistan."
Just last week, Hillary Clinton said she believes Osama bin Laden is still hidden inside Pakistan.
The documents detail a 2006 meeting with senior Taliban leaders in which Pakistani officials pushed for an attack on Maruf, a district of Kandahar that lies beside the Pakistan border. An offensive began later that year.
The files also link active and retired ISI officers to some of the conflict's most notorious leaders. According to the reports, in 2007, they sent also 1,000 motorbikes for use in suicide attacks.
The reports name former ISI chief General Hamid Gul as a go-between and claim he regularly met al-Qaeda and Taliban commanders to order suicide attacks.
In one classified "threat report", Gul is described ordering magnetic mines to be planted in snow on roads used by military vehicles.
"Gul's final comment to the three individuals was 'make the snow warm in Kabul' basically telling them to set Kabul aflame," the report said.
Another accuses him of meeting Arab "elders" in Pakistan's lawless tribal belt to plan a series of suicide bombings.
Yesterday Gen Gul angrily denied the allegations. "They are talking about a 74-year-old general who retired long ago and has nothing to do with this," he said.
"They are looking for some scapegoat and this is the sign of their defeat in Afghanistan."
Many of the reports are unverified, and Pakistanis have dismissed some of the more spectacular plots as fabrications. One claimed plans to assassinate government officials by disguising a remote-controlled bomb as a Koran, another involved poisoning beer supplies for Western troops in Afghanistan.
Much of the detail came from paid informers or Afghan intelligence officers – regarded as generally hostile to Islamabad.
A senior Pakistani intelligence source said simply releasing thousands of raw, unverified reports was misleading.
"Intelligence works in an entirely different fashion," he said. "We receive a preliminary report – which could come from anyone – and then you have to corroborate it from different, independent sources," he said. "A lot of this stuff will turn out to be untrue but we need weeks to check it."
