We also accept moderation reports via email. Please see the Content Moderation Policy for instructions on how to make a moderation request via email.
Thank you for submitting your moderation report
We will investigate and take the appropriate action.
N95 Masks: What Does the Highest Level of Scientific Evidence Say?
Bavaria and Austria, statements graphs:
The Best Science on Masks & Viral Transmission Says...
N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Care Personnel: A Randomised Clinical Trial:
Conclusions and Relevance:
Among outpatient health care personnel, N95 respirators vs medical masks as worn by participants in this trial resulted in no significant difference in the incidence of laboratory-confirmed influenza.
Effectiveness of N95 respirators versus surgical masks against influenza: A systematic review and meta-analysis:
A total of six RCTs involving 9 171 participants were included. There were no statistically significant differences in preventing laboratory-confirmed influenza, laboratory-confirmed respiratory viral infections, laboratory-confirmed respiratory infection and influenza like illness using N95 respirators and surgical masks.
The use of N95 respirators compared with surgical masks is not associated with a lower risk of laboratory-confirmed influenza. It suggests that N95 respirators should not be recommended for general public and non high-risk medical staff that are not in close contact with influenza patients or suspected patients.
Effectiveness of N95 respirators versus surgical masks in protecting health care workers from acute respiratory infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis:
In the meta-analysis of the clinical studies, we found no significant difference between N95 respirators and surgical masks in associated risk of (a) laboratory-confirmed respiratory infection, (b) influenza-like illness, or (c) reported workplace absenteeism.
Although N95 respirators appeared to have a protective advantage over surgical masks in laboratory settings, our meta-analysis showed that there were insufficient data to determine definitively whether N95 respirators are superior to surgical masks in protecting health care workers against transmissible acute respiratory infections in clinical settings.
Criticism of Bangladesh study:
Do Face Masks Reduce COVID-19 Spread in Bangladesh? Are the Abaluck et al. Results Reliable? By Prof. Denis Rancourt:
Clinical Trial In Bangladesh Shows Masks Stop COVID-19 (Sort Of):
More on the bangladesh mask study
Dr. Vinay Prasad: CDC's New Masking Studies: The Double Standard of Medical Evidence
Dr. Scott Atlas: "Bangladesh Mask Study Has Been Oversold, It's Weak Tea."
|Sensitivity||Normal - Content that is suitable for ages 16 and over|
MASKS IN HEALTH CARE SETTINGS: JACINDA MISLEADS KIWIS ABOUT HAVING TO WEAR ONE
2 days, 4 hours ago
Cathy Jamieson: Anomalies In NZs Adverse Reporting System – 30 May 2023
3 days, 3 hours ago
Mary Byrne of Fluoride Free NZ Asks Dr. Shane Reti MP About Water Fluoridation
3 days, 5 hours ago
Plandemic 3: The Official Great Awakening Trailer
3 days, 9 hours ago
Warning - This video exceeds your sensitivity preference!
To dismiss this warning and continue to watch the video please click on the button below.
Note - Autoplay has been disabled for this video.
This advertisement has been selected by the videos creator, Coronavirus Plushie.
This advertisement has been selected by the BitChute platform.
By purchasing and/or using the linked product you are helping to cover the costs of running BitChute.
It is free for anyone to opt-out of receiving advertising via the Interface tab on the Settings page.
To help support BitChute or find out more about our creator monetization policy: