MORE
Streamed on: Jan 27, 6:00 pm EST
https://shamer.locals.com/track/rumble/click/video?click=description
First of all Jordon Trishtan Walker is not just some guy off the street Project Veritas meets with. He happens to be the Pfizer Director Worldwide R&D Strategic Operations and mRNA Strategic Planning.
What the Project Veritas scoop reveals to me and it seems might be to all of us is that this Pfizer executive has some huge problems. By association Pfizer also has some big issues. No competent corporation would hire this individual. Just the fact of his being in his position reveals either an environment which selects for this or a massive failure by the corporation.
This guy is frenetic, unhinged. He is violent, physically attacks James O’Keefe and destroys his iPad. Yes, he is somewhat inebriated, but that simply underscores and further reveals what we actually observe.
Perhaps we as women are more sensitive to this kind of personality. We encounter them quite often as gaslighters as those who would take advantage of the fact we possess less physical strength. But the mentally competent, strong males who seek to be cooperative with us must come to recognize these personalities as threats to women, children, and to society. A failure to do so indicates a deeper problem.
Whether we are men or women if we ourselves are relatively mentally competent and healthy we recoil from this frantically compulsive behavior. We are warned off by his jerky body language, by the tumbling insensitivity and insensibility and incoherence of his speech. We are certainly warned by his physical and verbal attack. Even without psychological training we should be able to articulate some framework on which to base our own personal assessment.
It is simply a necessary skill to develop as humans. If we cannot almost instantly identify those who represent a threat to our well being we are in constant peril. A raving lunatic of a human can represent more danger than most other dangers we encounter. It is necessary also to have at least some rudimentary skills to accurately identify some of these psychological states.
I am no psychologist but at first glance I came up with some applicable terms. Toxic Narcissist, Serial Abuser, mentally unstable - potentially even the term psychopath.
Many people are against using psychological terms such as this because they believe it might be used to excuse the person’s behavior. The old not guilty by reason of insanity defense. In addition they immediately recuse themselves from using psychological terms because they themselves are not psychologists.
But in reality the greatest harm comes from the inarticulate refusal to fail to identify these things. Silence offers a hint of compliance to the status quo. Perhaps a refusal to be thorough and accurate out of fear of being attacked on the above grounds.
But the far larger danger is represented by our silence on these matters. I have noticed that even psychiatrists like Mattias Desmet M.D. and Mark McDonald M.D. are marginalized for their assessments and applications of terms like mass formation. As far as I am aware only psychiatrist Mark McDonald applies a psychological term in his book United States Of Fear. His subtitle - HOW AMERICA FELL VICTIM TO A MASS DELUSIONAL PSYCHOSIS - is telling here.
Even the psychiatrists however themselves seem to refrain as much as possible from the use of psychological terms here. It is as if everyone is steadfastly ignoring the elephant in the room.
This elephant is that toxic narcissism, serial abuse, even obvious mental instability is accepted in our society. There is evidence all around us and yet we refuse to engage with the issue. Magical thinking, denial, that if we ignore this madness it will simply vanish.
But instead the mental instability all around us grows stronger, more defiant, as if this mental instability were in effect normal. It represents our tacit approval of this reality. Using terms like clown planet, prison planet or more complex terms like panopticon we distance ourselves from recognizing and contending with the elephant.
The elephant tells us the world has indeed gone insane. Normal boundaries are regularly over run by all kinds of obvious craziness,
The word gaslighting has been used to explain that what our leaders are doing to us represents a form of serial abuse. Protecting ourselves as women from what is known as sexual gaslighting is something we learn early. Those of us who don’t learn early are far more likely to become victimized by it. We learn that to protect ourselves here facilitates a recognition of our own self worth. That to accept any level of gaslighting must be strictly avoided.
But now we as men and women accept living in a world where we are routinely gaslighted. When our politicians, our professionals, our corporations, our governments, our institutions gaslight us tend to overlook it as a way of the world. We explain it away because we don’t believe we
