Request Moderation
Registered user account required
Please Login or Register to submit a moderation request.
Email Submissions
We also accept moderation reports via email. Please see the Content Moderation Policy for instructions on how to make a moderation request via email.
Partly political rant: Figures and numbers
A strategic review of the biological threat in light of Covid 19 uncertainties (RAND corporation Bioterror paper 2020:
Dr. Sucharit Bakdhi. (University of Stutgart) One of Germany's top experts in immunology and virology:
In German with subtitles (on the need for a covid vaccine):
https://youtu.be/WbWJ4xIPAkA
English dubbed presentation:
https://youtu.be/YAYfh9ZGvRI
Great Barrington declaration (written by Dr. Sunetra Gupta from Oxford University. Jay Bhattacharya from Stamford University and Martin Kulldorff of Harvard University)
https://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://michaelharrison.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/The-Great-Barrington-Declaration.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwjklMCErarsAhXsURUIHePvDwoQFjAJegQICRAB&usg=AOvVaw09wbXPuujKB-lKaWiL2852
Retired UK GP Dr. Vernon Coleman on the conflict of interests with the SAGE committee and previous damage GSK and Astra zeneca have caused (these are the companies who're developing the covid vaccine):
https://youtu.be/XuhAynk4uVM
Prof. Richard Ennos from Edinburgh University:
https://youtu.be/QVuP7xOOXCA
Nobel prize winner Dr. Kary Mullis, the inventor of the PCR test, that's used here in the UK; to test for covid 19 and used to test you, on why it shouldn't be used to test for a virus:
It's 93% likely your positive test was a false positive result.
Dominic Raab (UK Deputy Prime Minister) on PCR testing from Sky news to back up that statement instead:
https://youtu.be/5RMtTZedzf0
And this article from the New England Journal of Medicine should, quite frankly; terrify everyone, that a respected scientific / medical publication would come out with this? This should spell out to you, some of the agenda driving this (Pay particular attention to the comments, section however as several of their peers actually looked into the "doctors" that wrote it and it's quite revealing who they are / work for?)
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp2020926
Twomenstandingstillproductions YouTube channel link:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCUX8AZaCTmxH9PhGJkK-89w
| Category | News & Politics |
| Sensitivity | Normal - Content that is suitable for ages 16 and over |
Playing Next
Related Videos
37
16:13
Partly Political Rant: YouTube proves we're winning!
3 days, 4 hours ago
17
22:27
Partly Political Rant: Words... They're funny aren't they?
3 days, 5 hours ago
49
38:29
Partly Political Rant: Believe me... Nows not the time(But we're damn close)
1 week, 3 days ago
68
13:29
Partly political rant: Know thine enemy is the first rule of war!!
3 weeks, 5 days ago
118
32:51
Commonly Misunderstood Legalities (Part 1): When is a potato not a potato?
1 month, 2 weeks ago
Warning - This video exceeds your sensitivity preference!
To dismiss this warning and continue to watch the video please click on the button below.
Note - Autoplay has been disabled for this video.
This advertisement has been selected by the BitChute platform.
By purchasing and/or using the linked product you are helping to cover the costs of running BitChute. Without the support of the community this platform will cease to exist.
Registered users can opt-out of receiving advertising via the Interface tab on their Settings page.
To help support BitChute or find out more about our creator monetization policy:
