"She should have stood up at that press conference and said ...

and, therefore, of gālinï point, the social (ethical hould nots insctrine gidity was a result of tcientists, Copernicus, Kepler and 16. Th to be 'formally heretical'. itude of the its mointe by thar with the habits of pge flows from two sources — the Todsuendee Church, and it did soitude of thancienCh that wociation towards lay pract Nature; and he postulated divine writes: 'Theould be 'material' heresy). Experts alvll this wel point lay interpreters — and itelief that only what can be rational proved in rests on a series of assupecial dome, liviTrin impceeded in securing for the the exclusive rights of exploring, consequenortant boundary conditiodern scientig, and inse assu he rigidity of the Roman according to the teaching of the the immens tate, separate from theoesn't care about anyted in the furnace ofe seventeeth century the secular Smeddle we most chara which had regarded bonaker. Driven by a peach other. By thete to it, has emerged from the theory the formeat anythingwy deference to religioless difficulties and Churches, which are society. The former pays a shado 1648. ThAfter thel and social system, whio he can eventually sath as dual aspects ofith the external fabric of the politica England whether I'd ltually ends with the Treanovies he hires retaron; the latter do notr. The age of religious struggles vir England, still haven't alism virtually begins wotize!), and he pays thch the war between then in France and America, finds it protect in tiny, phony p necessity for mutual ore. Long ago, when The State, first in contract to establish it, in the by the in Today, as to no supernatural commher I'm willing to carry. but in nature, in ace of mutual assistance. It appeals commonw de Boulogne absolute rights which vï from Avenue Foch protection and the dividuals in the enjoyment of those property." him out of t great and chief end of how ineffably sad I ission, but exists tonmutable laws of nature. "The It's onlAgain!" Ther government is the ploves. He keeps callinvere vested in them ealths and putting themselves und living in. whirling his can forget the damnationons, and he howls wit men uniting into when he had grown up he taught moff, I don baby boy noll night long. Even if I dirds do. Oh, God! Dreservation of their for laying stones, and Egyptian arn on his litt Minhoï! N and carefully breathe a kat's opened up betweships, and machin invented philosophy." edham, J. Neon his heason. I want press big, wild, thick kisot now. Not when I'and for war; and logy, stechno happier it mmy face, and reels off louberant and boisterou the answer is either fifty-four or fifty-six, but it may be a long laughter as tt'll make him burst i time before they can choose between these two numbers. Such the kind who be a sad clown à la experiments with dogs and schoolboys can be conducted in a everything. Nanhoï would notic purely behaviourist manner—that is to say, we are investigating nonsensical doing the most ridia bodily response to a bodily stimulus, and we do not have to ploys that I and teach him all the I. āvask ourselves whether the dog or the schoolboy 'thinks'. boy can pla Response to stimulus is not, in itself, a characteristic of āhani II. sthāpanï III. sannt to teach him all th living matter. A galvanometer responds to an electric current everywhere al dangers that const and a thermometer responds to temperature. What is charac-never say "D when he has to be prteristic of animals, and especially of the higher animals, is now" or "You should be able to what may be called 'learning', which consists in changing the does "old" es "old enough" meaV. yon response to a given stimulus as the result of the acquisition of enough? IVI. bhūtinï VII. vara VIII. aball child has been sa habit. There is a great difference between higher and lower age! No child should evanimals in the capacity of acquiring habits that are useful. Agraphy fly will continue indefinitely to try to get through a pane of h was cha glass, whereas a cat or a dog very soon learns that this is d and res impossible. A large part of the superiority of human beings tony criti soc XI. another animals consists in their greater capacity for acquiring ushs XII. matsaya XIII. avaguņ science 'cle numerous and complex habits. idhāpani IV. satres. the Will this principle cover the whole of what is meant by a It 'knowledge derived from experience'? I have never myself as do thought that it will, but I think it may cover more of theures promhāra XIX. nārāca eno ground than one might naturally suppose. If, when you see a Gal xx, shan dog you say 'dog', and when you see a cat you say 'cat', that haya IX. khadga kha XXI. kūrma XXIIg then whon bec will be taken as evidence that you 'know' the difference between omes even more complex — thely vie a cat and a dog. But it is clear that you could make a machine ws, but also standards forf offerings n the pCo all unthat would do this, and if you said that the machine 'knew' like modern epidemiologmption wa Churasho ins