The reason why women have been suppressed since immemorial times, seems to me, because women are social beings who (by nature) cooperate in a loving way and therefore offer bottom-up-leadership, for more solitary, physically stronger men, who would like to earn their approval and admiration and be eligible for both the reproduction as well as the upbringing of their children.
Under such a matriarchic regime, everyone would be able to enjoy the exchange and/or appreciation of everyone's own personal qualities, instead of seeing differences as a threat, like now in this patriarchic regime.
During the dramatic history of Argentina, the country where tango started to exist, you can see how, at the end of each dictatorship, an extreme left -wing regime is helped to power, spending all the public money on the help of the needy
until the country is bankrupt and again can be taken over by a dictatorial regime, which becomes desirable again to put things in order.
Something similar I see happening now with the global wars that, on one hand, seem to have been elicited to populate the mysterious Tri State City around the Netherlands,
for which the farmers are driven away from their properties, with elicited mass immigration of people who are more used to the right of the strongest and obedience.
On the other hand to depopulate by war, by involving as many countries as possible, leaving them with infinite debts, not being able to pay back the bank loans for paying weapons with which these wars are being waged.
Banks owned by institutions guided by a secret satanic agreement called The Secret Covenant, which literally describes what humanity should never find out, being that we are all equal.
The moment humanity finds out, satanic power will be over.
So while the word "equality" usually carries the main tone, the oppressed are encouraged to gain the same power and status as that of their oppressors.
You probably know it, the expression: "If mama ain't happy, nobody's happy" in which a situation is meant where you better give in when a suppressed woman acts like an over sensitive child.
Similar to feminism where women are encouraged to compete with male qualities instead of using their own powerful feminine qualities to put an example and create equality.
Or Tango, where a leader, according to insiders, could make his permissive partner shine, by treating her like a queen, not least in order to maintain his own position of power.
So also here, the oppressed themselves, want to be treated as an authority, rather than equivalent.
"Only if you treat your partner as a queen do you earn the status of King"
In my opinion, this same mechanism is currently functioning during the gender discussion in schools.
Also here, it is not suggested to treat children like equals, but that the teacher, using his dominant position, must treat these discriminated children with privilage.
