Three minor corrections at the end of this description but the video is still good and has no substantial errors in it.
I have seen many sources alluding to this phenomenon but here is just one of them...
Human ACE2 receptor polymorphisms predict SARS-CoV-2 susceptibility
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/biorxiv/early/2020/04/10/2020.04.07.024752.full.pdf
One dark aspect of all this is that for many people there might not be sufficient compatibility for them to contract the virus but enough interactions between the spike proteins in the vaccine and their hACE2 molecules to render them unable to serve their function thereafter in converting angiotensin.
So, the virus can not do them any harm but the vaccine can!
AstraZeneca's own publicity material is highly misleading.
The "producer cells" they refer to are in their factory not in your body.
The composition of the vaccine is as I say in this video and not as you might assume from watching their video.
Another important point with their vaccine (AZD1222) is that it only costs 3 dollars.
They are the only company that is not ripping us off.
In terms of what I am saying about DVT (deep vein thrombosis):...
DVT can manifest itself as redness and/or swelling in your limbs.
This source (which I only noticed after publishing my video) documents where it has been observed in COVID-19 patients and is presumed to be as a result of damage to ACE2 molecules...
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/2324709620931239
It felt like an "I told you so" moment when I came across this paper the day after uploading my video.
This is an early video of mine that I refer to in this video...
https://www.bitchute.com/video/1AbjzmApHICQ/
This is a playlist of my videos where they relate to COVID-19...
https://www.bitchute.com/playlist/rtPW4nMfDFCP/
There is another issue with mRNA vaccines - the protective coating they are encapsulated in. This may cause allergic reactions in some people. The video was never really intended to talk about mRNA vaccines though and only mentions them in passing.
I would have to look into it a bit more deeply but I know the original material used in the first mRNA vaccines caused serious problems in preclinical trials. A new material was developed and I presume that is what is used with the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines though I can't remember for sure.
This excerpt from an old email includes a source relating to the fact that some of us are immune but I can dig out more sources (a lot more sources)...
One of the other things I have been saying that everyone has been ignoring is some people can catch COVID and some people can't.
Obviously that means variations on SARS-COV-2 thus far seen.
It has nothing to do with our immune system.
I just did a quick five minute search and found this quote supporting what I am saying...
"we have identified natural ACE2 variants that
are predicted to alter the virus-host interaction and thereby potentially alter host
susceptibility. In particular, human ACE2 variants S19P, I21V, E23K, K26R, T27A,
N64K, T92I, Q102P and H378R are predicted to increase susceptibility. "
Source:
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/biorxiv/early/2020/04/10/2020.04.07.024752.full.pdf
I have seen plenty of other references to this.
I saw one guy complaining he couldn't get his S proteins to fuse with the hACE2 molecules he had been using (therefore it is obvious whoever was the donor of those cells could never have caught COVID-19).
It is obvious from the clinical data too.
Here is one of many articles referring to people with conditions that are being attributed to blood clots but could equally be the result of constriction of blood vessels...
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9516013/Fit-healthy-engineer-27-died-three-weeks-having-AstraZeneca-anti-Covid-jab.html
One alternative theory out there is that free floating DNA from the vaccine could have platelets clumping with it and forming clots.
There is however no good reason why the vaccine would have free floating DNA in it.
Corrections:
1.
The number of spike proteins in each jab is approximately 50 billion.
I had seen this the previous year and had it in my notes but had forgotten it in the run up to making the video.
It was in the Astrazeneca report.
2.
I think I am wrong about how many people got the wrong dose and which cohort they were in but those graphs depicting the difference between full dose and half dose are correct and the point being made is correct.
I just saw it referred to today but don't have the right info in front of me right now as I note the correction.
3.
Also, the injection is intramuscular.
