Talking Politics VS Talking Morals - How One is a Debate, and One Actually Matters

This is one of our most crucial considerations moving forward. We don't need it to be red or blue, left or right, we need moral or amoral. Take an actual stance, because the moral and the amoral is all around you, created with some amount of intention by those living within a moral narrative in which your wellbeing is of little or no value. The key to their different language seems to be that they can use language to abstract, and dismiss your most crucial interests, while asserting their political interests as a moral imperative such that benefits for them are a sanctified thing. Your interests are a dirty, sacrificial thing within their narrative. So moving forward, will you sanctify our interests as untouchable through language? Or will you continue being the sacrificial, and dirty interest within their story of success at your expense/over you?
Towards the end I explain how the self-imposed silence of many churches is a total dereliction of Christian duty, also some indications throughout that biological white erasure is as amoral in Christianity as it would be when simply considered as biological white erasure. My website on Christianity: https://solidrockragingseainheritance.wordpress.com/