USA DOCTORS RENAMED ANCIENT RITUAL "MEDICINE FOR PENIS" - Brother K - Viewer Discretion
Copied from https://youtu.be/9zgVpZfCeYA
Welcome to life.
"We cannot allow this to happen any longer. I WILL NOT tolerate living in a society that turns a blind eye to this rape and torture of infant boys."
"Rape of the foreskin is trauma based mind control!"
"Forced genital mutilation of males is no different than forced genital mutilation of females. It has been proven via histological analysis that essentially all the erogenous nerves of the penis are located in the ridged band and frenular delta of the foreskin, both of which are cut off. I was circumcised for pseudomedical reasons by the NHS in the UK when I was 14 and it destroyed my sexual pleasure completely. The glans penis is almost non-erogenous in character. It's like the eyeball--covered in crude free nerves that detect pain and pressure. That's all the circumcised man's left with. Unfortunately many people have bought the baseless folk theory that the glans penis and glans clitoris are the primary sexual organs. This is untrue and no histological evidence exists to back this up.
Forced circumcision is the most disgusting, despicable act you could do to someone. It's objectively worse than rape--it is non-consensual but it is also irreversible and damages you for life. I have PTSD/depression over it and have sworn off women because sex is pointless. Imagine how many boys and men commit suicide, get depression/PTSD or end up murdering people due to this horrific crime.
Ban it now. Anyone who supports this human rights abuse is a psychopathic sadist."
"Male circumcision is more sexually damaging than FGM. More tissue is excised, more nerves are lost, more functionality is lost. The foreskin has been PROVEN to be the primary sexual tissue with almost all pleasurable properties because the glans has virtually no fine touch reception, mostly protopathic sensitivity [i.e. pressure]. By a simple process of elimination, we can deduce that the foreskin is the hub of pleasure."
It's not actually an ancient ritual. Certain rabbis created what is currently known as radical circumcision. The original method involved doing something minor to the acroposthion: http://acroposthion.com/
CIRCUMCISION: THEN AND NOW
There used to be a very good circumcision and "foreskin restoration" forum run by the TLC Tugger founder. I put foreskin restoration in quotes because it's not a real foreskin containing all the specialized nerves and mucosa but is a natural skin covering that externally looks close to the real thing. One day, out of nowhere, the forum just disappeared. The host said there was a disruption and all data was lost. The material there never was "anti-Semitic" but it was extensive and damning. Anyone stumbling across it would quickly realize the brutal abuse and mutilation that is routine radical circumcision.
"The indifference to a woman's sexual pleasure that is implicit in Maimonides becomes explicit in R. Isaac. The sexual inadequacy of the circumcised man, implicit in the Midrash on Genesis and in Maimonides, becomes explicit in R. Isaac. Maimonides' implicit contrast of the circumcised man with the foreskinned, the former sexually restrained and therefore devoted to God, the latter sexually unrestrained and therefore estranged from God, becomes explicit in R. Isaac. The crucial difference between them is that Maimonides lived in a Muslim environment in which virtually all men were circumcised, while R. Isaac lived in a Christian environment in which virtually all non-Jewish men were foreskinned. In R. Isaac's eyes, Christian men were sexual supermen, who could pleasure their women to a degree far beyond the capacities of Jewish men, and who could do so far more often. If virility were to be defined in terms of sexual prowess, Jewish men would fail miserably, because their circumcision has rendered them incapable of pleasuring their women. But for R. Isaac, of course, virility is a function not of sexual prowess but of intellectual and spiritual capacity, and by this criterion circumcised Jewish men are manly indeed, while foreskinned Christian men are impotent."
Shaye J. D. Cohen, page 156 of Why Aren't Jewish Women Circumcised?: Gender and Covenant in Judaism. 2005.
Marked in Your Flesh: Circumcision from Ancient Judea to Modern America.
I believe degenerate ideas of sexuality and radical circumcision do go hand in hand. Common pornography is by the radically circumcised victim for other radically circumcised victims. People who are intact in mind, body, heart, spirit are easily satisfied with the natural riches of life.
Quotes by women https://pastebin.com/9rrvLF23
|Category||Health & Medical|
|Sensitivity||Normal - Content that is suitable for ages 16 and over|
Warning - This video exceeds your sensitivity preference!
To dismiss this warning and continue to watch the video please click on the button below.
Note - Autoplay has been disabled for this video.
This is a randomly selected affiliate advertisement.
By purchasing and/or using the linked product you are helping to cover the costs of running BitChute. Without the support of the community this platform will cease to exist.
Registered users can opt-out of receiving advertising via the Interface tab on their Settings page.
To help support BitChute in other ways or to find out more about our monetization policy: