Complete control over quarantine, doctors, endless mandatory vaccination…
The Treaty will allow the WHO to decide what a pandemic is, what lockdown measures must be done, for how long, and by whom. It will compromise health, the ability to choose me…
Complete control over quarantine, doctors, endless mandatory vaccination…
The Treaty will allow the WHO to decide what a pandemic is, what lockdown measures must be done, for how long, and by whom. It will compromise health, the ability to choose medical treatments, informed consent, and our freedoms.
The WHO has a worrisome reliance on the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation: The Gates Foundation is the second-largest contributor to the WHO. As of September 2021, it had invested investing nearly $780 million in its programs this year. Germany, the biggest contributor, had contributed more than $1.2 billion, while the US donated $730 million.
https://archive.ph/zpldD
1.) The authority to declare what constitutes a pandemic (in the past, they have changed the definition). It could be the flu.
2.) They would decide what the quarantine requirements are; they could unilaterally decide to put you in a quarantine center or keep you home from work.
3.) They would determine how the new infection is diagnosed and what tests are used to measure it (prior example: the fraudulent PCR test ramped up the numbers).
4.) The WHO would decide how to prevent or treat the new disease. They could, yet again, deny doctors the ability to treat patients the way they would like.
5.) The authority to determine which medications are safe and who develops them. (They call the COVID jab 'safe').
6.) They would be in charge of how the new vaccines are promoted, including vaccine mandates.
-------------------------
Posted for educative purposes under THE FAIR USE NOTICE: These Videos may contain copyrighted (©) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior general interest in receiving similar information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode "Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976.
(https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/legalcode)
