General contentions of 'No-planers':
1. Violation of Newton's Third Law of Motion
An aluminum plane hitting a thick steel beam is equivalent to a steel beam that's swung at equal speed and hitting the plane. Whether the plane or beam's in motion, the effect's identical. Both instances result in a damaged plane and a relatively undamaged beam. The faster the speed upon impact, the more damaged the plane is.
Flight 175 struck the South Tower at 450 mph. If the South Tower moved at 450 mph and struck a stationary Flight 175, the expectation wouldn't be that Flight 175 go undamaged, but would rather disappear into the South Tower. Thus, an aluminum airplane with a fiberglass nose cone penetrating a steel and concrete building violates Newton's Laws of Motion.
2. Flight 11 and 175 were entirely inside the towers, without visible plane parts
Boeing 767's are 156-feet wide and 159-feet long. The distance from the outer perimeter of the North Tower at Flight 11's alleged point-of-impact to the central forty-seven cross-braced steel beams is sixty feet. The distance from the outer surface of the South Tower at UA Flight 175's alleged point-of-impact to the South Tower's core structure is thirty-seven feet. If building length is measured by distance to the core structure, the differential length of the North Tower with respect to plane-length is ninety-nine feet; that of the South Tower, approximately 122 feet. Therefore, most of a 159-foot-long Boeing 767 would be outside either Tower.
3. Boeing 767's can't fly 500 mph at sea-level
Aircrafts can exceed such speeds, but Boeing and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) utilize Velocity Max Operating (VMO) and Velocity Not to Exceed (VNE), so to do so risks structural failures that'd result in an airplane crash.
The speed and acrobatics of the planes would've caused them to break from the stress on the aircraft frame due to higher air-pressure at sea-level. Experienced commercial and military pilots have stated that even if the stress didn't cause the wings to break off—and it would—it's improbable that a pilot, let alone an inexperienced one, would be able to hit the Towers.
The turbofan engines would struggle to handle the volume of air going into it. Structural loads and air-frame pressures being unequal, some parts of the plane couldn't withstand certain stresses while others could. Professional pilots and aviation experts say that anyone flying at speeds exceeding 415 mph at 1,000 feet risk the plane's destruction.
4. No verified plane parts
If a car hits a wall, the car crumples—and the effect would be similar if planes hit the Towers. The wings would've separated from the plane and fallen to the street below, which would be littered with plane-debris and charred remains of passengers.
One of FAA'S post-planecrash investigative responsibilities is to gather plane parts and move them to a secure location, which are laid out in their relative places on a grid-lined floor and checked for identifiable numbers. These are cross-referenced by the plane's history, manufacturer and factor paperwork.
There are potentially 500,000–1,000,000 recognizable parts per plane, yet the FAA, the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), the 9/11 Commission, the CIA, FBI and U.S. Government failed to provide a single reference number.
5. FAA Regulation 121 requires comprehensive investigations of scheduled commercial flight crashes, yet didn't provide official reports for any of the four incidents
Related literature:
The New Pearl Harbor: Disturbing Questions About the Bush Administration and 9/11, by David Ray Griffin (2004): https://amzn.to/2M4lo8y
The 9/11 Commission Report: Final Report of the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States, by National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon The United States (2004): https://amzn.to/2EwtQr3
The New Pearl Harbor Revisited: 9/11, the Cover-Up, and the Exposé, by David Ray Griffin (2008): https://amzn.to/2W259xh
Where Did the Towers Go? Evidence of Directed Free-energy Technology on 9/11, by Judy Wood (2010): https://amzn.to/2HzkvAK
The Most Dangerous Book in the World: 9/11 as Mass Ritual, by S.K. Bain (2012): https://amzn.to/2YMPGy2
Follow me:
BitChute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/tamirfawkner/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/realtamirfawkner
Gab: https://gab.com/tamirfawkner
Goodreads: https://www.goodreads.com/tamirfawkner
Minds: https://www.minds.com/tamirfawkner
Periscope: https://www.periscope.tv/tamirfawkner
Pinterest: https://www.pinterest.com/tamirfawkner/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/tamirfawkner
Support the Channel:
Amazon Affiliates: https://amzn.to/2ExiYsT
BitChute Referral Link: https://www.bitchute.com/accounts/referral/tamirfawkner/
Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/tamirfawkner
