Gateshead Council vs MARK STEELE

Streamed live 17th May 2019

Case Number E01NE627 Civil Case by Gateshead Council against Mark Steele
Judge Kramer decided Mark Steele should be fined £250, suspended for 2 years. Gateshead Council were seeking costs of £3,100 but the judge denied this.
There were no main stream reporters in court again.
Gateshead Council provided no evidence to suggest Mark Steel was wrong
We need the public to raise awareness and question 5G and LED street lighting in their areas
20 institutions are involved with the latest study which came out of Barcelona, published by Exeter University which shows the increased risk of cancer
There are no diffusers on the street lights which makes them extremely hazardous. They have category 3 optical radiation emissions which means you should wear protective eye wear
Your council has a constitution on their website, in most cases it can be downloaded. Gateshead Council's (286 pages) clearly spells out who is responsible for the health, safety and well being of the residents. If Council's don't make an effort to stop 5G they are clearly complicit.
The Government have allowed the telecom industry to put masts up to 75 feet in urban areas and 85 feet in rural areas. There are 35,875 in Gateshead by a company who have now gone into administration
The switching on of 5G in Korea in 5 cities have led to outbreaks of mass fires
Look at the research of Martin Paul who is raising awareness of the dangers of this technology
Exeter University and The Institute for Global Health based in Barcelona have put reports out stating the evidence of the health impact in communities