The shadow banned channels of YouTube - DARPA set to launch new algorithm to wipe out "Fake News." Published Nov. 9th, 2019
Despite news stations and mainstream media outlets progressively making more mistakes, the authoritarian and tyran…
The shadow banned channels of YouTube - DARPA set to launch new algorithm to wipe out "Fake News." Published Nov. 9th, 2019
Despite news stations and mainstream media outlets progressively making more mistakes, the authoritarian and tyrannical suppression associated with internet censorship rolls forward with no slowing down, like a bulldozer from hell. And now DARPA is getting set to roll out defensive bots to wipe out "FAKE NEWS." We have already switched the topic of this channel twice, and are well aware of how YouTube's algorithm targets certain topics.
If only for the advertisers alone, I could understand throttling certain topics to better the advertiser-user experience, what irks me is the political bias that resonates withing the algorithm itself. A bias towards supporting Chinese communist censorship tactics, and an obvious bias towards Hillary Clinton as some mainstream outlets like MSNBC and CNN have also been shown to have deep ties to the Clintons.
When the mainstream media is caught lie after lie (more so now than ever) and when previous candidates like Hillary Clinton (as pointed out by Tulsi Gabbard) have been corrupt, as a "platform" you would think YouTube would see it as their responsibility to keep the information as unbiased as they can so that they don't unintentionally embroider themselves with scandals like the Clintons and Epstein's death.
The truth is it's the very opposite. In short, YouTube may have started off as a free-speech-representing platform, but as of late their strategies, especially disincentivizing independent content that has been crucial in unveiling some of these explosive corruption dealings, seems to be on the wrong side of history. It makes you wonder why is YouTube on the side of individuals like Hillary Clinton anyway? Why would the CEO of YouTube endorse Hillary Clinton when her job and responsibilities is predicated in having an open platform, at least as detailed by their agreement with the U.S. Congress..
