You are about to action:

Object being modified by the action

Do you want to proceed?

Appeal Target Moderation

Appeal details

Please provide the details of your appeal, including why you believe this target has been incorrectly moderated.

Note: For copyright infringement counter claims see the Terms and Conditions.

Thank you for submitting your appeal.

We will investigate and inform you of the outcome.

Report Video

Reason

Please select the most appropriate reason from the list provided.

Note: For copyright infringement claims see the Terms and Conditions.

Time Offset

Please specify the time offset in the video where the issue occurs.

Additional comments

Please add any additonal comments that will help with the assessment of your report here.

Thank you for submitting your report.

We will investigate and inform you of the outcome.

Share Video Link

https://www.bitchute.com/video/v44XeiOQcYUr/

Embed Video HTML

Add to Playlist

Analysis of Steve De'ak's "Recreation" & Theory of How the Shanksville Plane Crater Was Made on 9/11

Watch

Next video playing soon

Click to cancel

First published at 13:40 UTC on November 7th, 2018.

Mark Conlon Blogspot

subscribers

This is a video analysis of Steve De'aks theory regarding how the plane shaped crater was made in Shanksville on 9/11. I show that his "alleged" reproduction comparisons using NASA's lab test impact craters, and also his own recreation experiments do NOT sufficiently to explain how the engine craters or tail section impression were made at the Shanksville crash site. his comparisons do not contain these two areas of impact. There are also other issues with the angle trajectories which would make it impossible in reality at the Shanksville site due to the treeline too tall. there is also no evidence of any damage or disturbance to the adjacent trees from a low angled trajectory creating the one side of the crater.

LESS