Click to copy, then share by pasting into your messages, comments, social media posts and websites.
Click to copy, then add into your webpages so users can view and engage with this video from your site.
Report Content
We also accept reports via email. Please see the Guidelines Enforcement Process for instructions on how to make a request via email.
Thank you for submitting your report
We will investigate and take the appropriate action.
Dr. David Martin: They Approved a Unicorn - Comirnaty Doesn't Exist If You Read the Documents
"They approved a unicorn: Comirnaty doesn't exist. The moment there is an approval, the EUA protections for J&J and Moderna would cease to exist instantaneously.
A mandate for an EUA has to exist inside no clinical alternative, now we know they stacked the deck. The FDA refused to consider any meaningful alternative to a vaccine. All of the evidence was suppressed so the only path forward was vaccines. There's no question that the absence of alternatives was born of a manufactured absence. The reason why we don't have an alternative is because we said there wasn't going to be an alternative, not because the science dictated that. We need to be very clear on that. Which is the reason why we have this very bizarre is it really an approval, or is it really and extension of an EUA, and what they did is something the law does not allow. There are no provisions that say we can have our cake and eat it too. We either have an approved vaccine, in which case Moderna and J&J need to be shut down immediately because the EUA doesn't support it. Or it is still an EUA, in which case we don't have a full approval. The problem is nobody is supposed to read their own documents, from their own hand, where you can see the self-evident nature of this lie."
Excerpt, Dr. David Martin, Brighteon Conversations, September 5, 2021
-----------------------------------------------
THE FAIR USE NOTICE: These Videos may contain copyrighted (© ) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior general interest in receiving similar information for research and educational purposes.
For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode "Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use." Disclaimer: 17 Notwithstanding the Provisions of Sections 17 U.S.C. @ 106 and 17 U.S.C. @ 106A, the Fair Use of a Copyrighted work for Educational Purposes- Not For Profit- Non-Commercial.
Category | None |
Sensitivity | Normal - Content that is suitable for ages 16 and over |
Playing Next
Related Videos
Major Japanese Press Conference On Covid Vaccine Injuries And Death
2 days, 4 hours ago
Warning - This video exceeds your sensitivity preference!
To dismiss this warning and continue to watch the video please click on the button below.
Note - Autoplay has been disabled for this video.