Click to copy, then share by pasting into your messages, comments, social media posts and websites.
Click to copy, then add into your webpages so users can view and engage with this video from your site.
Report Content
We also accept reports via email. Please see the Guidelines Enforcement Process for instructions on how to make a request via email.
Thank you for submitting your report
We will investigate and take the appropriate action.
‘Operation Blue Flag The Sky Jack’ host Patrick Henningsen and Field McConnell - Abel Danger
McConnell (30 year airline and 22 year military pilot; 23,000 hours of safety) believes that Serco launched the Black Hand navigator extortion racket in 1994 by recruiting former PATCO associates to work in a FAA Contract Towers network outsourced to Serco and the clients of its drug-hub banker HSBC by the former President of the United States, Bill Clinton.
"As part of Serco Group, one of the largest contracted providers of Air Navigation Services worldwide, the company is responsible for more than 960,000 miles of airspace and handles more than six million aircraft movements a year. Serco employs more than 700 air traffic control specialists at over 75 airports - located in the U.S., U.K. and Middle East - who help maintain flight safety. In the US, the company has also been honored with the prestigious Willie F. Card Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Contract Tower Award 5 out of the past 7 years at towers in Lewiston, ID (2003), Phoenix-Mesa Gateway, AZ (2004), Jackson Hole, WY (2005), Goodyear, AZ (2008), and San Luis Obispo, CA (2009)."
McConnell claims that Serco ordered former patent lawyer Hillary Clinton to set up Base One Technologies as a State Department honeypot in 1994 where navigators could adopt the British Black Hand "Crown Rights" rule to practice whatever patents were issued for cockpit sleeper cells such as the "uninterruptible" autopilot developed by Boeing and patented in Canada.
"From the early days of the Republic, Congress and the federal courts grappled with the government’s rights to own or use patents it issued. Courts rejected the British “Crown Rights” rule that allowed the sovereign to practice whatever patents it issued. Instead, the federal government was conceptualized as a legal person on par with any other persons with regard to issued patents. But, this simple rule presented challenges as complexities arose in three intertwined patent rights scenarios. The first involved inventions by government employees. The second revolved around government and government contractor use of patents held by private citizens. And the third involved inventions by federal contractors and their employees arising under federal funding. While these three scenarios seem quite distinct today, nineteenth and early twentieth century courts often treated them as overlapping. The confusion was not resolved until the mid-twentieth century when a combination of executive branch and Congressional legislation set the roots of current government patent policy. This Article reviews the history in detail and illuminates current government patent policy debate occurring through such seemingly diverse cases as Stanford v. Roche and Zoltek Corp. v. United States."
"Sun, Dec 03, 2006
Boeing Patents Airliner Anti-Terrorist System
Autopilot Autolands Aircraft For Incapacitated Crew A new "uninterruptible" autopilot developed by Boeing and patented in Canada purportedly flies and lands the aircraft in case the crew is incapacitated.
An autopilot that can fly and land an airliner isn't new, but one that activates itself when it senses excessive force on the cockpit door is (the crew may also activate it manually).
Even that feature isn't as controversial as this: once initiated, the system may not be disengaged by anyone aboard the aircraft. Once engaged, Boeing's system will accept directions from ground-based controllers. The controversy stems from concerns over what might happen should the system malfunction -- or worse, should terrorists gain control of an aircraft from the ground.
A less-controversial system is under development in Europe. Called Security of Aircraft in the Future European Environment (SAFEE), the design incorporates microphones and cameras in the cabin allowing pilots to monitor passenger activity. It also includes digital fingerprinting and iris scans for cockpit access, and a function tied to sensors and the flight controls preventing a terrorist from flying an aircraft into a building.
Several companies are working together on SAFEE. Airbus has already tested the threat detection element of the system. Pilots may easily monitor activity in the cabin with sensitive microphones and video cameras. The company plans a full simulation in January of 2008.
European electronics giant Thales is developing the anti-collision element of the system and plans to test it next month. Dutch firm NLR will develop biometric sensors for fingerprinting and iris scanning. Its system will be tested next August. FMI: www.boeing.com, www.thales.com, www.airbus.com"
No other organization gave the deep state more thorns than Field McConnell and David Hawkins of ABEL DANGER ...... It is my belief that the military ran an operation against Abel Danger to take down the organization and ruin Field McConnell's life ..... and Trump was used to lead the attack against Abel Danger ...... Change my mind ......
Category | News & Politics |
Sensitivity | Normal - Content that is suitable for ages 16 and over |
Playing Next
Related Videos
Witches in Militaries - Diary of a witch
1 month, 3 weeks ago
Is it Live or is it Livery - Abel Danger
1 year, 2 months ago
1 year, 4 months ago
Warning - This video exceeds your sensitivity preference!
To dismiss this warning and continue to watch the video please click on the button below.
Note - Autoplay has been disabled for this video.