Click to copy, then share by pasting into your messages, comments, social media posts and websites.
Click to copy, then add into your webpages so users can view and engage with this video from your site.
Report Content
We also accept reports via email. Please see the Guidelines Enforcement Process for instructions on how to make a request via email.
Thank you for submitting your report
We will investigate and take the appropriate action.
Weekly Update --- True Budget Hawks are Foreign Policy Doves
Weekly Update --- True Budget Hawks are Foreign Policy Doves
Video - Tuesday July 30, 2019 - Ron Paul
By Ron Paul - During my presidential campaigns, well-meaning supporters would sometimes suggest I stop emphasizing opposition to overseas intervention and focus on fiscal issues. I disregarded the advice, not only because adopting a noninterventionist foreign policy is crucial to restoring constitutional government but because it is impossible to be both a budget hawk and a war hawk. This is shown by the constant failure of so-called fiscal conservatives in the Republican leadership to fulfill their promise to cut spending.
Military spending is the second largest category of spending in the federal budget, behind Social Security spending. The US military budget equals the combined budgets of the next seven biggest-spending countries. Yet, many Republicans who claim to want to reduce federal spending want to increase the military budget.
Many Republicans also prioritize protecting the military-industrial complex over reducing spending on welfare and entitlement programs. This makes them eager to agree to a deal giving Democrats almost all of their welfare wish list as long as Republicans get almost all of their warfare wish list. Many Republicans do not have a principled objection to the welfare state; they just think Democrats want to spend too much on welfare and not enough in warfare. Many Democrats find increasing warfare spending acceptable; they just think Republicans want to overspend on warfare and underspend on welfare.
We saw the process at work again last week when the House passed a two-year budget deal that increases spending by approximately 320 billion dollars per year and suspends the debt ceiling for two years. Republican leadership ignored all these problems and claimed victory because the bill increases warfare spending.
A majority of Republicans opposed the spending bill, even though it was supported by President Trump and the Republican leadership. Of course, many more Republicans would have voted for the bill if a “conservative” Republican still held the speaker’s gavel.
Republicans’ love affair with the military-industrial complex is not the only reason they are unwilling to reduce spending, and military contractors are not the only Republican constituency demanding spending increases. Many farmers vote for Republicans who promise to cut most domestic spending except for agricultural subsidies. Also, many Republican Congress members support corporate subsidies and bailouts. Still, anyone who observes the behavior of Republican leaders around budget time can see they have a primary priority of protecting the military-industrial complex.
Republican Congress members’ support for ever-higher levels of military spending is justified by their support for an interventionist foreign policy. Some in Congress claim to favor both an interventionist foreign policy and reductions in military spending, but these so-called cheap hawks cannot resist the demands for an increased budget since they support a hyper-interventionist foreign policy. They are unable to effectively respond when their fellow hawks accuse them of compromising national security by opposing “adequately” funding the Pentagon.
As long as Republican leadership supports an interventionist foreign policy, it will never support reducing warfare or welfare spending. Therefore, fiscal conservatives must join libertarians to restore a foreign policy of peace and free trade. Lobbyists for the big military contractors would find it more difficult to make their case for big spending if Congress limits the defense budget to what is needed to defend America instead of wasting trillions in supposed efforts to police and democratize the world.
http://www.ronpaullibertyreport.com/archives/true-budget-hawks-are-foreign-policy-doves
http://ronpaulinstitute.org/archives/featured-articles/2019/july/29/true-budget-hawks-are-foreign-policy-doves/
Copyright © 2019 by RonPaul Institute. Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit and a live link are given.
Please donate to the Ron Paul Institute
#MIC
#MILITARYINDUSTRIALCOMPLEX
#RONPAUL
Category | News & Politics |
Sensitivity | Normal - Content that is suitable for ages 16 and over |
Playing Next
Combatting Terrorism? US AFRICOM Is Making Terrorism WORSE!
4 years, 8 months ago
Related Videos
2020-11-2 'Fire Fauci!' - Trump Rally Explodes Over Coronavirus Doom And Gloomer
3 years, 5 months ago
2020-8-31 CDC Bombshell: Only Six Percent Of 'Covid Deaths' From Only Covid!
3 years, 7 months ago
2020-7-23 While Covid Distracts, Turkey And Egypt On Brink Of War Over Libya
3 years, 9 months ago
2020-7-22 US Expels China From Houston Consulate. Is Pompeo Pushing To Spark China War?
3 years, 9 months ago
2020-6-25 Coronavirus: Worse Than Ever...Or More Fake News?
3 years, 10 months ago
2020-6-18 Bolton On The Attack - 'Tell All' Book...Or Pack Of Lies?
3 years, 10 months ago
Warning - This video exceeds your sensitivity preference!
To dismiss this warning and continue to watch the video please click on the button below.
Note - Autoplay has been disabled for this video.