A Nato McCain Building? Really?

It seems Nato and the American president are forced to be pitted against eachoter by the powers that be. We all know Mc Cain, the pro war senator of the united states that died not to long ago, and Trump aren't the best of friends. And Trump does not seem to care about the Nato partnership so Nato seems to think it may be a good idea to maybe name a building of the dead warhawk of the USA.

Stuff to read;
https://www.rt.com/usa/437185-nato-headquarters-mccain-name/
https://www.military.com/daily-news/2018/08/30/nato-considers-naming-brussels-headquarters-after-mccain.html
https://edition.cnn.com/2018/08/29/politics/nato-considering-naming-building-for-john-mccain/index.html

About McCain.
https://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/news/john-mccains-purported-vietnam-war-propaganda-recording-released-by-far-right-internet-radio-host-8529339
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xNuNiU-Ip3c
https://www.theburningplatform.com/2018/08/31/mccain-the-hero-nearly-sunk-an-aircraft-carrier-killed-134-sailors/
http://www.politicalaffairs.net/28-votes-mccain-s-record-against-veterans/
https://original.antiwar.com/giraldi/2013/05/29/john-mccain-war-hero-or-something-less/
https://votesmart.org/candidate/key-votes/53270/john-mccain-iii#.W4m_8ugzaUk

You can reach me on [email protected]
And yes, I am on the twit. @Modwain
And you can also find me on minds.com, also as Modwain.
And I try to be active on bitchute.com as Modwain.

FAIR USE NOTICE
This video may contain copyrighted material; the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available for the purposes of criticism, comment, review and news reporting which constitute the 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. Not withstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work for purposes such as criticism, comment, review and news reporting is not an infringement of copyright.