First published at 02:13 UTC on December 15th, 2017.
The anti-Trump/pro-Hillary FBI agent Peter Strzok, who was the lead agent working on the Hillary Clinton email investigation, is facing scrutiny after his wildly inappropriate texts to his mistress were exposed.
How could Strzok, who was literally …
MORE
The anti-Trump/pro-Hillary FBI agent Peter Strzok, who was the lead agent working on the Hillary Clinton email investigation, is facing scrutiny after his wildly inappropriate texts to his mistress were exposed.
How could Strzok, who was literally hero-worshiping Hillary, conduct a fair and impartial investigation?
His show of admiration for Hillary and his biased hatred of Trump prove the Hillary email investigation was a total scam.
From Conservative Tribune
Peter Strzok, the FBI agent who led the investigation into Hillary Clinton’s mishandling of classified information on her private email server and whose text messages about both Donald Trump and Clinton have created issues for Robert Mueller’s Russia probe, had praised Clinton even while he was supposedly investigating her, The Washington Post reported.
Strzok had been taken off of Robert Mueller’s Russia probe just weeks after joining it this summer, although the reasons behind the removal were kept from the public until earlier this month.
That’s when it was discovered that Strzok had been sending anti-Trump, pro-Clinton text messages to an FBI lawyer he was having an affair with, creating a conflict of interest even too great for special counsel Mueller to bear (something that must have come to a surprise to many in Washington, who assumed such a thing was like the Yeti or cold fusion).
That was bad enough, but it was now revealed that some of those messages involved pro-Clinton sentiments while Strzok, the former deputy head of counterintelligence for the bureau, was conducting the email investigation. Strzok also changed the text in former FBI Director James Comey’s draft statement on the Clinton matter to say that the former secretary of state’s actions had been “extremely careless,” not “grossly negligent.”
The texts were part of an information dump on Congress on Tuesday, where the House Judiciary Committee was preparing to hear testimony from Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein on Wednesd..
LESS