Should PLATFORMS allow conspiracy theories? What does CONSPIRACY THEORY even mean?

For years now, Silicon Valley tech giants have been progressively taking away our freedom of speech via cancel culture and the implementation of negative financial incentives (i.e. demonetization) especially against what they term fake news or conspiracy channels. This is essentially taking away people’s opinion, or at least if they are deemed too edgy by often times undisclosed parties. But why, what is the end game in all this censorship against opinions and channels that are trying to investigate the truth? Which comes to the next point, what does “conspiracy theory” even mean?

DEMONETIZED CHANNEL - Support us at www.Patreon.com/2ndEarth | www.PayPal.me/2ndEarth

In 2020 it seems to be almost trendy to be authoritarian-leaning. To supposedly care for the entire system as opposed to oneself, sounds nice in practice, but historically speaking it doesn’t always work out in the favor for the people. China has had a major role in normalizing communism for the rest of the world, not to mention that their unprecedented GDP growth has led many experts to accept communism more so than in the past. China’s growth has come at a cost, however, and that is freedom. If you happen to be Muslin, the same system that purports to help the people may instead throw you in a concentration camp scenario. If you happen to be a dissident of the Government, or disagree with their politics, the same fate may apply to you. The point I would hope is obvious, at least it was for the United States founding fathers, is that for a Governing system to prosper, and for individuals to be protected against big governments, there needs to be modes of checks and balance against the Government itself. In the U.S., for example, you have protection of the press as well the ability to arm yourself to protect yourself from others, which includes aspects of the Government that has become tyrannical. In China, the system can never be challenged from the people’s perspective without a bloody revolt, so in essence the system is set-up to progressively etch away at human rights while silencing their opinions, since the incentive of the system is more aligned with self-preservation as opposed to the preservation of the individual status. China’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic, closing domestic flights while encouraging international flights to not affect business, is a perfect example of this big government self-preservation behavior at the cost of others. Not to mention that much of China’s recent growth was in part due to stolen intellectual property of the U.S. and other nations. If the WHO is being corrupted by China, and China is more concerned with taking away people’s freedom-of-speech and are essentially dictating a New World Order for the rest of the world to follow, why are certain platforms banning people for not following suit with the World Health Organization? I guess you can see why it imperative to make episodes like these that challenge the notion of taking away our inalienable rights, including our freedom of speech.