FalseFlags+Hoaxes

channel image

FalseFlags+Hoaxes

FalseFlags+Hoaxes

subscribers

Just like Biden, this presidential moron, in a cluttered room, has to read his statement to the world from a script and with obvious difficulty. Notice that about halfway through the video he has a laugh with someone off camera. ARE THEY LAUGHING BECAUSE THEY KNOW A-BOMBS ARE A HOAX?
The photo is of a group of men in front of a screen showing a mushroom cloud which could have been caused by detonation of a large amount of TNT. It was probably taken at the US military's propaganda film studio at Lookout Mountain in California. If that were really an atomic bomb then they would not survive its detonation as they are only about 200 yards away from it.
The moronic Trueman says that 'the source from which the Sun draws its power has been loosed'. But the Sun emits energy through nuclear FUSION and not nuclear fission, so despite having the world's best scientific advisors the script read out by this moron is wrong in that detail. The US presidential moron, however, has no inkling that he has just made an importantly false statement. He does not understand the difference between fission and fusion.

A war game presented as footage of Ukrainian military destroying Russian tanks by The SUN newspaper on it's YOUTUBE channel.

More fakery from Ukraine. Do you see any projectiles fired from those tubes? The explosions are just CGI fakery.

Here we see Evelyn Rothschild, one of the wealthiest, if not the wealthiest, men in the world. His wife is on his left and dirty Bill has his arm around her waist. There appears to be some wealth and power elite wife swapping going on here. Bill also rode on Epstein's Lolita Express. Evelyn Rothschild owns a mansion on Martha's vineyard where the US president holidays every July. So that explains why the US president of whichever party is in power always holidays on Martha's Vineyard
A-Bombs are a Hoax
Notice that none of the films of the atom bombs, alleged to have been dropped on Japan, show the atom bomb falling, nor do they show the detonations which should result in a blinding flash of light (the unforgettable fire which some in Hiroshima spoke of) being seen in the film.
All we see is a mushroom cloud which is actually just the smoke and dust arising from a city which has been bombed with high explosive and incendiary bombs, that is firebombed. There were at least two observer planes flying with the B29s, so why did the personnel on those planes not film the bombs falling and film ther detonation-you would expect that the US government to try to gather as much data as it could on this momentous event for mankind but they failed to film the drops and detonations.

here we see a pre-recorded video of a Ukrainian vehicle (they do noy give its name but it would have to be a light armoured vehicle armed with anti-tank missiles). If there is a camera on the outside creating this alleged footage then why not film directly with another camera or that camera to an SD card and show the footage directly from the SD card? Because the footage is fake.

The Ukranian 'supermen' allegedly knock out 4 tanks in quick succession without the Russian heavy tanks firing a single round in return nor attempting to take evasive action! Must be the most incompetent army in history! What were the Russian crews doing? Watching a video of Zelensky playing the piano with his penis?
And Shane Warne, murdered by the Australian government at 52 after all he did for his country.

Fake video of flight 175 striking South Tower. Also note that the 500,000 ton steel and concrete building does not even cause the plane to lose speed which is a physical impossibility.

The plane allegedly cut through a row of 11-inches x 11-inches external steel supporting columns braced with 2-inches thick steel plate and through at least two of the steel and concrete floors without sustaining any damage and without any de-acceleration. The steel wall gives no more resistance to the planes passage than the air surrounding the tower.

The photo is of amputee Jeff Bauman with his prosthetic 'bomb damaged' legs in the aftermath of the Boston Bombing Hoax. He had allegedly been lying in a pool of his own blood for 20 mins receiving medical attention yet only has a small smudge of red on him. Actually he lay for 20 mins while the prosthetic legs were fitted. His palor is normal and not the white it would have been as a result of shock and blood loss from his legs being blown off. And his expression shows slight tension only and not agony and he is fully alert rather than unconscious or semi-conscious which is what we would expect him to be if the event were real.

Here so-called President Zelensky plays the piano with his penis. The poor benighted Ukranians, who are actually ruled by the US State Department, CIA and MI6, are in extraordinary fits of laughter and one man appears to have almost fainted. This is what passes for comedy in Ukraine.
'Zelensky, he come on and play piano with penis! Me and wife Nadezhda, we cry with laughter at Zelensky! This is almost as funny as when Zelensky, he come on stage and wave potato in air! Zelensky and potato are so funny!'

Here the fakery is obvious. The camera pans up in response to the sound of a jetliner. It does not pan up to show a jetliner as there is no jetliner. You do not see a plane fly past the building to the right of the tower. Instead you see it magically materialize out of thin air near the tower.
The full fake video, taken directly from YouTube at 460 def., is available on this channel: the Naudet Brothers Video. 460 def. is the maximum definition for the video on YouTube.

Notice that they do not film an actual Russian tank being destroyed but instead show a pre-recorded video of the event on a screen within the armoured vehicle. Why do they NEVER show us a Russian tank being destroyed, on footage obtained by directly filming the tank, at ground level? It is always only footage of a screen showing the destruction inside an armoured vehicle. Why do the Russian tank crews allow themselves to be killed in their tanks without ever returning fire? Because the videos are FAKE! There are no Russian tank crews fighting in Ukraine.

NUCLEAR WEAPONS ARE A HOAX!

.https://odysee.com/@EricDubay:c/NukeHoax:5
https://odysee.com/@stpierrs:f/Nuclear-Hoax---Nukes-Do-Not-Exist---240p.mp4:7

According to the Sun this video shows: 'Ukranian gunners spray bullets at Russian targets'. They edited together footage of different training events to create this. Do we see any Russians being hit? NO! Do we see any Russians at all? NO! More lies. Yet again the Russian military is conspicuous by its total absence!

Oh, there were no Russians as they were all in Kharkiv and Kiev wasting munitions by firing tank guns at elderly couples in cars! As every military force does when involved in a conflict where a single shell saved could make the difference between life and death for a tank crew! Yeah right!

So we are shown a damaged building but why is nothing else damaged? Look at all the nice undamaged old architecture in the background. This is just some derelict building that was either due for demolition or was sacrificed to make fake videos. And, of course, there is no footage of the missiles actually striking!

A bomb is dropped. it disappears before it hits the ground below the trench. Then we see an explosion in the trench. Any blood, body parts blown off? NO again!

We see some soldiers, which nationality cannot be learned from the video. They look like they might be training. Do we see them being wiped out by Ukraine forces? How about another big NO!

There were over 300 CCTV cameras at Washington Dulles Airport that day and the only footage avaliable is this fakery which is not time and date stamped which it would have been if it were from a genuine airport CCTV camera. The 5 shown here allegedly crashed flight 77 into the Pentagon. Even if this had been genuine footage these men could just have been actors who never actually boarded the plane.

The footage is shot at 30fps instead of the 1fps of real airport CCTV footage. So it was in fact shot with a commercially available camcorder, and it was presented to the public, not by the FBI, but by lawyers acting for 911 victims. There is no footage of alleged 911 hijackers available from any of the other airports from which the hijackers allegedly flew: Boston Logan and Newark. Could they not find any actors for those airports?

https://www.consensus911.org/the-911-consensus-points/https:/

This Sky News team made this fake video to persuade us that 'Russian death squads' who fire on civilians in cars were operating in Ukraine. That is mentioned at the start of the video. It is described as a 'professional ambush'. They want us to believe they were ambushed by a Russian death squad from a Ukrainian checkpoint.

After a few minutes in he says 'We think it's a Ukranian checkpoint and a mistake' but the commentary at the start refers to 'Russian saboteurs' and states: 'Russian death squads who shoot at civilians in cars as they flee. They do exist, as we found out.' Then he calls it a 'professional ambush'. The commentary was added to the film AFTER their alleged rescue by police, which we do not see, and AFTER the time in which he said they (allegedly) thought it was a 'Ukranian checkpoint and a mistake'. So he says in the commentary that he found out there were Russian death squads operating after he said and thought it was a Ukranian checkpoint firing on them.

In fact they did not think it was a checkpoint nor a death squad as no one fired on them. Ukranians did not fire on them and any who say it was Ukrainians firing on them have no evidence to back that claim, and he implies that it was not Ukranians firing on them near the start of the video. Why would Ukranian troops fire on what they could only have taken for a group of Ukranian civllians or media people?

We see some sparks but sparks, flashes, explosions, muzzle flashes and fires can easily be added with editing software.

Do any bullets hit the car? No. The winscreen is not shattered nor even cracked.

They are allegedly fired at yet they continue to drive towards where the bullet came from instead of stopping and turning and getting the hell away from the source of the fire! Yeah right!

They do not film the alleged death squad: neither with camera, nor compact, nor phone. They do not film the alleged firefight at the warehouse as neither it nor the death squad attack occurred.

Notice that the firefight only begins at the warehouse after they go in. Also note that they do not attempt to film the firefight outside with a phone or camera, why? Because it was dubbed on sound. They show no fear of the firefight because it is not happening.

They had two chances, if this video were genuine, to show Russians firing on others: first at a group of journalists, and then at Ukranians, but they did not choose to film either.

They claim the cameraman took two rounds to his body armour but fail to show us the impact damage.

They say they were rescued by police but do not show us the police. Yet again the Russian military is conspicuous by its absence. One of the Murdoch-owned-SKY liars has put a bit of fake blood on his forehead. Do we see an injury? No. FAKE FAKE FAKE!!!

Dr. Madej reveals the appalling objects she (and other doctors) have found in the fake Covid vaccines.
Graphene oxide is toxic but highly conductive of electricity. Are the lipid nano-globules and the graphene oxide setting up an electric current which would explain why people are turning into (electro) magnets after taking the shot?
Finding graphene oxide in the vaccines is not surprising as there are many web articles which discuss the use of graphene oxide in vaccines other than the Covid vaccines. However, graphene oxide is not one of the declared contents of the fake covid vaccines.

There is no missile visible at any point in this piece of fakery from Murdoch's lying rag! The Sun!

The Sun's description of this event says that 'the missile can be seen lifting off' when in fact there is no missile to be seen anywhere on this video. We see a flash and then bizzarely the helicopter's tail detaches from the body of the helicopter having been apparently sheared off by a giant pair of garden shears. Look at the precise straight edge of the rear of the body and the tail. If the chopper had really been struck by a missile in that particular part close to the fuel tank, then the shards of white hot metal would have caused the fuel tank to explode and the chopper would have fallen as a fireball to the ground, but we see no flames as it descends. The only flame we see is a brief flash allegedly resulting from the missile impact, and then the shearing off.

A missile does not cause any shearing forces, it just explodes and causes massive damage through a blast wave and shrapnel. A missile could not cause the tail to shear off from the body.

We do not see the chopper crash-because it never did.

The wreckage shows no sign of the burning that would have resulted from a real missile impact. Moreover, they do not tell us what airforce division the crew belonged to, nor what the choppers mission was, nor what division the troops it was carrying belonged to. They do not show us any dead bodies nor say how many died in the attack. The fake wreckage could be just some old scrapped Ukranian helicopter. It shows no signs of having been burned.

How they faked the occurrence of the first alleged Covid wave.

What? This just a blue blur with a glow in it! We don't know what it is even if it is footage of actuality!

It is merely a test for mRNA which is also present in many bacteria and in humans. Also, after a certain number of cycles it starts to detect background noise: RNA from organisms (including the human body) which is not part of the target DNA. Even Fauci admitted that.
The thumbnail is a lipid nano-globule similar to that used in the Pfizer fake vaccine.

A single Ukranian tank, manned by supermen obviously, destroys an entire Russian tank convoy and the Russians never return fire! This is fake. You can find more realistic looking computer wargames than this rubbish!
If edited on fire from the Russians in addition to the fake shots from the Ukrainians, then awkward questions would arise as to how many and who were killed by the Russians and how many were injured, and fake interviews with the fake survivors would have to be arranged and the dead and injured named, and in the absence of any Ukraine dead or injured in the Ukrainian tanks people would become suspicious of the footage. So it keeps matters simpler if the Russians never return fire in the fake vids.

Gates claims he only visited Epstein to attempt to persuade Epstein to donate to the causes Gates supports. He only calls the meetings a mistake because he did not get the money he hoped for.It took him four years of trying to screw money out of Epstein to realize none would be forthcoming. yeah right!!

A body language expert exposes Gates' highly suspicious stress-induced reactions to questions about his relationship with Epstein.

The photo you see is Epstein's neck wound following his alleged suicide. As you can see it is just fake blood painted on his neck. He is alive and living somewhere in South or Central America with his beloved Ghislaine Maxwell following her fake trial.
There is no damage to the skin. There is no abrasion of the skin. The hair follicles are intact. FAKE!

This Sky News team made this fake video to persuade us that 'Russian death squads' who fire on civilians in cars were operating in Ukraine. That is mentioned at the start of the video. It is described as a 'professional ambush'. They want us to believe they were ambushed by a Russian death squad from a Ukrainian checkpoint.

After a few minutes in he says 'We think it's a Ukranian checkpoint and a mistake' but the commentary at the start refers to 'Russian saboteurs' and states: 'Russian death squads who shoot at civilians in cars as they flee. They do exist, as we found out.' Then he calls it a 'professional ambush'. The commentary was added to the film AFTER their alleged rescue by police, which we do not see, and AFTER the time in which he said they (allegedly) thought it was a 'Ukranian checkpoint and a mistake'. So he says in the commentary that he found out there were Russian death squads operating after he said and thought it was a Ukranian checkpoint firing on them.

In fact they did not think it was a checkpoint nor a death squad as no one fired on them. Ukrainians did not fire on them and any who say it was Ukrainians firing on them have no evidence to back that claim, and he implies that it was not Ukranians firing on them near the start of the video. Why would Ukranian troops fire on what they could only have taken for a group of Ukranian civllians or media people?

They are allegedly fired at yet they continue to drive towards where the bullet came from instead of stopping and turning and getting the hell away from the source of the fire! Yeah right!

Notice that the firefight only begins at the warehouse after they go in. Also note that they do not attempt to film the firefight outside with a phone or camera, why? Because it was dubbed on sound. They show no fear of the firefight because it is not happening. They had two chances, if this video were genuine, to show Russians firing on others: first at a group of journalists, and then at Ukranians, but they did not choose to film either.

They claim the cameraman took two rounds to his body armour but fail to show us the impact damage.

They say they were rescued by police but do not show us the police. Yet again the Russian military is conspicuous by its absence. One of the Murdoch-owned-SKY liars has put a bit of fake blood on his forehead. Do we see an injury? No. FAKE FAKE FAKE!!!

SHOW MORE

Created 2 years, 1 month ago.

35 videos

Category News & Politics

This channel is dedicated to exposing the false-flag events and hoaxes perpetrated by agencies of western governments, such as MI5, the FBI and the CIA etc.. You can find a list of admitted false flags simply by searching:' admitted false flags'.

The Twin Towers did collapse but not by the cause nor in the way we have been told by the liars Cheney, Rumsfeld and Bush and countless so-called scientists and journalist liars who were all desperate to keep the world believing the lie that the two one-quarter-mile-high 500,000-ton buildings were destroyed by two 100 ton jets and their fuel, which were piloted by Arab terrorists who had only ever flown in light single engined-propeller driven Cessnas and yet were able to hit their targets with absolute precision.

The towers collapsed but THEY WERE FIRST TURNED TO DUST BY A DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPON. Look at the collapse and say what you see. You see the towers turn to dust and then the dust cloud collapses but you could not recognize the event for what it was before, because you had never seen such an event before, and the liars in the US government never told you what really happened.

Following the dustification and collapse, the dust flowed through the streets for a time and then rose into the air and was dissipated by the wind. The floors did not fall like a stack of pancakes and you can verify that by looking at the videos of the collapse-do you see the floors pancaking? No. All you see is a dust cloiud.

The above explanation is the only one which accounts for the small amount of debris at ground zero after the event.If the towers had simply collapsed because of burning jet fuel or a controlled demolition then there would have been a huge mountain of debris of around one-million-tons at ground zero which was not the case as the videos by Judy Woods Phd on this site show.

Every building in the WTC complex was turned to mostly dust but none of the other buildings nearby-why? because the WTC was destoyed by the precise use of a directed-energy weapon. The buildings of the WTC were reduced to stumps after most of their construction material and the objects they contained was dustified. Where did the towers (and their contents, which included dead humans) go? They and their contents were all turned to dust and went up into the sky and were scattered by the wind, and are now scattered around the planet on fields, deserts, mountains, ocean floors etc.Every building in the WTC complex was turned to mostly dust but none of the other buildings nearby-why? because the WTC was destoyed by the precise use of a directed-energy weapon.

The buildings of the WTC were Every building in the WTC complex was turned to mostly dust but none of the other buildings nearby-why? because the WTC was destoyed by the precise use of a directed-energy weapon. The buildings of the WTC were reduced to stumps after most of their construction material and the objects they contained was dustified. Where did the towers (and their contents, which included dead humans) go? They and their contents were all turned to dust and went up into the sky and were scattered by the wind, and are now scattered around the planet on fields, deserts, mountains, and ocean floors.

Go to RichPlanetTV and look for the lectures by Judy Woods Phd to confirm what I say here. She shows footage of enormous steel supporting columns turning to dust as they fall
. https://www.richplanet.net/

JUDGING BY THE EVIDENCE NUCLEAR WEAPONS ARE A HOAX
https://www.flatearthscience.org/nuclear-hoax-nukes-do-not-exist/#comment-11847
Whatever the truth about the shape of the earth the evidence strongly suggests that nuclear weapons do not exist. There is NO footage of either the allleged A--bomb dropped on Hiroshima nor of the alleged A-bomb dropped on Nagasaki in 1945.

So, why did the scientists and military personnel in the planes accompanying the the Superfortresses not film the two nuclear events? All we have as evidence are a few grainy photos of some smoke clouds which could be smoke arising from a fire bombing or just fakery. The reason is that the attacks with fission weapons never happened.

Most of the buildings in the two cities were made of timber and so the photos you see of the two cites almost completely flattened show the destruction wrought by conventional boms and incendiary bombs. You also see a few brick or stone buildings which survived the bombing. Why did they survive? Because they were made of materials tougher than timber. A real nuclear blast would have destroyed them as well as the timber buildings.

[show less]