For many years I have had an appreciable mistrust of anything the government bureaucrats and their associated buddies have tried to push on us, The covid related events of the last 3 years have confirmed and increased my mistrust of the government technocrats and friends or is that fiends.
When I first heard of cultured meat it made my skin crawl, I vowed to avoid it when ever possible. As the fake meat was primarily used in the fast food chains and eating at one has not been an option for years, I feel I have safely avoided the fake meat so far but was concerned it would show up on my plate at sometime.
So business magazine have reported the fake meat or as the industry seems to prefer animal cell-based meat (ACBM) or cultured meat did not seem to have widespread consumer acceptance. ACBMs were being promoted as an environmentally conscious way of producing meat, a a way to reduce the amount of CO2 being produced. The paper: Environmental impacts of cultured meat: A cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.04.21.537778v1.full from bioRxiv notes “The results indicate that the environmental impact of near-term ACBM production is likely to be orders of magnitude higher than median beef production” Hopefully the paper will ultimately serve as a nail in the coffin of fake meat production.

The BC Provincial Health Officers FOI people's no answer to a request for information
Around the Beginning of December 2022 in response to another round of babble from the British Columbia Chief Health Officer I asked for the science to support her words. Dr Bonnie Henry’s people took 6 months to respond with information that one would assume was “sitting on the doctor's desk”.
I expected peer reviewed scientific papers to support her various mandates and health orders. She said the health orders, mandates etc were based on science. I asked her to provide the science.
Her people took 6 months to respond with a letter of links to various government both provincial and federal web sites repeating the same information on the vaccines were safe and effective, masks work (see our Alan Cassels interview on masks don't work https://rumble.com/v29e72s-media-and-governments-are-pushing-masks-again-..-but-the-science-says-they-.html (It was because of this interview I made the FOI)). Going through the web sites they refereed to me I could find no scientific papers just at best references to the supposed science they were looking at.
When I replied to them that their response was a non answer. The Bonnie Henry FOI person quickly returned words to the effect she knew the answer was inadaqute but I should be happy with the non answer because the infinitly more superior than a mere human government bureaucrat/technocrat/lackey had provided a response they knew was not an answer.
I suggest the problem with their non answer is our fault as for years we have let them get away with misinformation and outright untruths and they have became even more bold in their misinformation and don't care if we call them on their misinformation

The We Unify https://www.weunify.ca/ “Reclaim Canada Conference “was held in Victoria, BC from Friday May 26, to Sunday May 23, 2023. The conference generated a number of good Key Take aways. The lead off panel on the media generated the first good take away. With the legacy media not reporting the news and for all intents and purpose dead. The alternative media or new media in its many forms has emerged into the vacuum left by the legacy media.
The key take away for some was the new media has to work together to promote the news and information. This is an area where both those that produce the new media and the consumers can work together to promote the news.
One of the first presenters and panellist at the media table was Serena “Freedombear: Winterburn. Ms Winterburn is a prolific example of the new media independent journalist.. She regular posts on several media platforms. Her Facebook page is Coffeetime with Freedombear, https://www.facebook.com/serenafreedombear/videos/coffeetime-with-freedombear-the-plot-thickens/499170868790818/ , Tik Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@serenafreedombear on youtube she can be found at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L-lngC14Dbw and she recently started a twitter account at https://twitter.com/SerenaFBear @fBear

British Columbia ... Bill 36: The Health Profession and Occupations Act
British Columbia's new health bill makes important changes to how health professionals are regulated. It was pushed through, very quickly, by BC's NDP government.
Conservative MLA and Party Leader John Rustad, presented a petition to the BC Legislature in early May asking for the new law to be repealed or at least delayed until important changes are looked at and discussed. Many in the health field feel the bill gives the government too much control over their profession. For example, the 'colleges' that run the various health field .. (the college of physicians and surgeons, college of oral health professionals, and etc.. ) will no longer have board members elected by the people in the college; all board members will be appointed by the government. There are also concerns that the government will have too much control, over what health professionals can say and do when they are with their patients. Say 'the wrong thing' and you can be sanctioned. There are also parts of Bill 36 that seem to promote the use of possibly mandatory vaccinations for health professionals, AND that seem to tie BC in to the new World Health Organization Pandemic Treaty that is due to be completed and put into force in 2024.
In the end, Bill 36 will mean what the government wants it to mean. For those of us who know that our governments cannot at all be trusted, this is not good news.

Several years ago I purchased a bripe coffee maker (brew pipe) from Equator Coffee near Ottawa. It looked like a good way to get a “quick” shot of coffee while out on a ride. The bripe produces a small short of intense coffee experience, which I described as similar but not an espresso, recently someone pointed out it was similar to a Turkish Coffee – a more accurate description. For me a good coffee is a strong intense drink of coffee, those that measure a quality coffee in terms of ounces of coffee , the bripe does not work. Very quickly the bripe became my preferred way to brew coffee at home.
As could be expected the light/heater to heat the water wore out from use. (A Cigar lighter is not intended for the 2 or so minutes of constant use to heat the water). I assumed no problem and could just order a replacement from Equator coffee or its subsidiary https://briping.com/ but was not that easy. To order it I was required to pay using my “Shop Pay” account, first problem here To have a ShopPay account I needed to give them my cell phone number. Having an Environmental Sensitivity I known as Electro Magnetic HyperSensitivity (EHS) I can not have or use a cell phone. Environmental Sensitivities according to the UN declaration of Human Rights is to be accommodated, this is continued in to the Canadian Human rights. So I then looked at their alternate methods of payment using Goggle Pay or PayPal – both required I give them full financial details which they appear to pass onto the CIA (I have no doubt had I gotten further with ShopPay I would have had to provide them with financial details to be forwarded to the CSA too)
I then asked if I could send them a Canadian Postal money order and they refused with a snarky email ridiculing me for my concerns. When I got back to them suggesting they reconsider Craig Hall the owner of Equator Coffee doubled down with another snarky remark.
For their lack of customer service and insistence I provide financial details to the CIA as well as their insistence on using digital currency and refusing to accept as good as cash, I can not recommend this company as one to do business with their concept of customer service appears to be the antithesis of good customer service,

Many workers in Canada have been forced to get vaccinated to keep their jobs. People who refused have been fired by the thousands. Right now here in British Columbia you cannot apply for a Provincial Government job if you are not vaccinated. With Health Care workers there is a sense of crisis in our hospitals and the question should be asked ... if more than 2000 health care workers have lost their jobs because of what seems to be an unjustified reason (based on the science), then should those people be rehired. There are a number of court cases underway on that very subject now.
It is not true that the vaccine prevents transmission. There is simply no science that says that. So to discriminate on the basis of that is unscientific. And this is not Alan Cassels opinion, this is the opinion of scientists from around the world. If we've made a mistake, why can't these people be rehired? Unless the goal is just to be punitive. And yet the reality is that the unvaccinated are now locked out of many if not most jobs; which is coercive, unscientific and wrong.
It is a mystery as to why these mandates are being mandated.
There have been cases in the U.S. where mandates have been overturned by the courts. In Canada the courts have not really ruled on this yet, but people are waiting for that to happen. Is there a scientific justification for these mandate policies? Mr. Cassels does not think there is. We are constantly told the science is there by our governments and media, even though the best science does not support those kinds of statements.
The rules are often piecemeal and apply to some groups and not others which also doesn't seem fair.
When the courts finally deal with these issues, the real science may come out. It will be surprising if there is good science that says Vaccine Mandates make sense.

Bank of Canada Governor Tiff Macklem on Crypto Currencies and a B of C Digital Currency in year end remarks to the BC Business Council on December 12, 2022 T Bank of Canada Governor Tiff Macklem on Crypto Currencies and a B of C Digital Currency in year end remarks to the BC Business Council on December 12, 2022 The full video is well worth listening to if only to learn where the Bank of Canada fells our economy was last year and where they plan to direct the economy of the country going forward. A couple of remarks jumped out at me as worthy of special note. I have not seen these comments in the main stream media. The first is around the 13 minute point when the governor opines on his view for why the rise in global populism and many nations turning inwards. The governor notes a number of factors in the last 20 years have kept inflation low while fostering an increase in productivity. He also opines the failure to adequately share the growth in productivity has resulted in a rise of populism. I see rthose comments as in the area of promoting socialisim - a very unusual comment to make to a business council.
The last part of the video features a conversation with Jock Finlayson, Senior Policy Advisor at the Business Council of British Columbia (BCBC), And the last question from Jock is in regards to digital currency. The answer includes a brief comment on the current trend of cyrpto currencies which he notes are not the same as a Central Bank Digital Currency.
The Bank of Canada is in the last stages of preparing to introduce a digital currency in Canada; one of the last steps will be for the government of Canada to pass and enact enabling legislation. As part of the preparation to implement a digital currency in Canada the bank is planning to “consult with Canadians on their views on Digital currency. He also notes the demand for printed cash is on the increase in Canada – for me that appears the Canadian citizens have and are expressing their views - they want our economy to be based on physical cash. The people are speaking, Bank of Canada are you listening?
Recently a news report notes United Kingdom Prepares To Introduce A ‘Digital Pound’ Central Bank Digital Currency is on the verge of a digital economy, this is a trend globally with many countries on the verge of a digital economy. Another way to describe this trend is countries globally (including Canada)are well under way to use a digital currency as an early step to deprive the global population of their freedom and liberty as an early step in the global progression to a social credit score where the government/deep-state can de-list one as a person or control what they eat and where they go.
How can the progression to a digital curreny loss of freedom be stopped - if it is not too late?
Use Cash where and when ever possible. Don’t leave a digital trail that global cabal can use to track and follow your every movement and even who you associate with.

(An interview with drug policy researcher Alan Cassels.)

The story we are now being told, in mid-November 2022, is that we should all start wearing masks to protect children, who are reportedly filling the hospitals with respiratory illnesses.
But DO our governments and media really care about children's health? If so, why have they allowed the corporations to poison us and wreck our planet to the point where the future for all children alive today is ... shall we say questionable. Our governments and media have allowed Big Business to destroy children's futures, but then they tell us we have to get vaccinated and wear masks - because they are concerned about children's health. This makes no sense, why should anyone believe them?

We ask Drug Policy researcher Alan Cassels about these new mask mandates, starting with ... Do masks work? According to Mr. Cassels, there is virtually no scientific research showing that masks effectively prevent the transmission of viruses or bacteria. There is even a study showing that for use BY surgeons, when doing operations ... the use of masks does NOT provide better results for the patients. So even there, where one would think masks are essential, the science does not necessarily go along. The same when studies are done at long term care facilities during flu outbreaks, the use of masks does not provide any benefits for the people in the care homes. When there is no benefit shown, then great care must be taken when telling people that masks do work.
If anyone wants to wear a mask, that is great. But to then mandate that people MUST wear masks, when there is no science showing any benefits ... we have to ask why this is being done. Especially when there is the possibility of various kinds of harm from wearing masks.

With the current respiratory illnesses we are told many children are getting, we have to ask if it was our past practices, over the last few years, that have weakened children's immune systems and are now causing this problem. We are doing things we don't fully understand, and that may be a dangerous place to go. But our media and governments keep telling us to do more, while pretending the science is settled and all on their side. Which is a pack of lies.

We're being told to wear masks to protect others, but there is NO PROOF that we are being told the truth. And we can't get our hands on the 'science' the governments are using; they simply won't release it. And there is also the possibility that long-term mask wearing is harmful.

What are those mysterious towers popping up in New York City and why are the very harmful- think near field radiation.
These towers when radiating mmwave will put every one in a mile radius within the near field zone. The near field zone is characterised by spectacular peaks of radiation intensity others refer to the chaotic radiation pattern. Even experts associated with the telcom industry advise to not be in the near field zone - why are they erecting these towers in close proximity to peoples residences,?

Alan Cassels is a long-time drug policy researcher who often focuses on how the media reports on medicines. The quality of medical reporting has, according to Mr. Cassels, been steadily going down, and the media reporting on Covid follows that pattern. The magnitude of benefit - and harm - from any drug or vaccine is a vital piece of reporting because the public has a right to know these things and people depend on getting honest information from the media.

One of the most important facts of the Covid pandemic was the Infection Fatality Rate. How many infected people will die from the disease. It was recognized early on that the IFR was, for most age groups, quite low. In the 50 to 60 age group, the IFR was about 0.15% .. or about 1 or 2 people in a thousand who get Covid will die from it and in younger age groups death rate from those who got Covid was virtually zero. It was surprising therefore how many people were quite willing to get the vaccine without ever looking at the real benefits and harms FROM the vaccine - and the actual risks people faced from the disease itself.

Large studies done early on showed that the death rate was HIGHER in the vaccinated groups than in the unvaccinated group. The vaccines 'may' have perhaps prevented some Covid deaths, but even so the total number of deaths in the vaccinated group was shown early on to be higher than in the unvaccinated control groups. And that is what seems to be playing out now. What we are seeing now is a high excess death rate in countries around the world. We are seeing an excess death rate in many countries that is 15% to 20% higher than the long term average death rate, and this is largely from heart attacks, strokes, cancers and etc. And the media is not asking public health people or politicians to explain these deaths. And are the excess deaths in the vaccinated or unvaccinated populations.

A recent study from Spain and the US published in the magazine 'Vaccine' showed an increased risk of 'harm' for the vaccinated. Is getting vaccinated - plus boosting - really a good idea?? The media have largely supported vaccines and boosting, without asking questions or critically looking at the evidence. This is of no benefit to the public; we are being let down and betrayed by the media.

Brian Peckford was one of the signees of Canada's "Constitution Act' and Charter of Rights and Freedoms back in 1982. He discusses the details of how Canada's Constitution is currently put together and how it works. He says one reason the Charter was added to our constitution because many people felt it was important to have our rights actually written down and codified.
When the Pandemic was declared by the WHO, on the basis of fairly flimsy evidence, many governments including the gov't of Canada put in place a bunch of mandates and lockdowns to 'save us' ... and brought in a vaccine that was and still is untested. At that time Mr. Peckford, as a signatory to the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, became concerned at what he saw as 'violations' of that Charter. The governments do have a right to override the charter, but they must be able to demonstrably show the need to do so. This was not done.

At the same time doctors were being threatened with loss of their medical licenses if they dared question the official story. Again this is hard to justify within the scope of the Charter. What the courts and governments have been doing is in violation of the intent and words of the Charter.

Mr. Peckford - along with several others - initiated a lawsuit against the federal government questioning their right to limit the ability to travel of millions of Canadians. The suit was brought at the beginning of 2022. There were going to be 5 days of public hearings in Sept. 0f 2022. In June of 2022 the feds asked the Federal Court to dismiss the case because ... the travel mandates were 'suspended'. And the court agreed with the Government of Canada and found there was no reason to even hear the case brought by Mr. Peckford et al. As if everything that had been done to Canadians for months was of 'no importance' to the federal court. Mr. Peckford calls this a 'divorce' between law and justice.

So Mr. Peckford and the others have decided to appeal the decision to the Federal Court of Appeals, which is where things now stand. With long waits coming before anything happens in the courts. The next step if necessary will be an appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada, where the Chief Justice has already denigrated the rights of Canadians to maintain our Charter rights.

Also, on November 2, 2022, a Citizen Led Inquiry into Canada's Covid Response will be announced. What was the evidence that led us into the Covid response. What was the actual science that our governments, public health officials, and media kept well hidden. The plan is to have hearings across Canada.

There is a big agenda at play, 2030, a One World Government, and etc. The Pandemic is just one step on the way to total global control by a small group of people. One way to get people to comply is 'fear'. We are almost three years into a world-wide 'pandemic' and the solution so far is a mandated dangerous vaccine program. The creation of fear, and then the 'solution'. This is an age-old playbook that has been used against us.

We are now in a calmer place Covid-wise ... things are largely back to 'normal'. Friendships have been renewed, families have come back together, much of the anger has disappeared, the economy is reopened. But this may just be 'the eye of the hurricane' with more difficult times just ahead. There is now a fairly major war in Europe; the threat of nuclear war, a state of inflation and higher interest rates, an energy shortage in Europe and supply chain problems here and there. Food shortages may be coming and there may be a wave of 'crises' coming over the fall and winter of 2022/23.

The ultimate goal may be an economic crisis, a digital currency, a digital ID and social credit score system where all behavior is monitored and non-compliance is penalized.

One can argue that there is a well planned; world-wide initiative taking place that will lead us into places that we may not want to go but we will have no choice. We shall see. We are in uncharted territory and this is not, in many ways, the Canada many of us thought we were living in. We may have to prepare for a future that is very different from our recent pas

In part this shift away from individual rights occurred because we were told that when we got vaccinated we were 'protecting others' as well as ourselves. So taking the vaccine was the right thing to do because not only was it perfectly safe, but because we all want to, and have an obligation to, protect family members, friends, workmates, strangers on buses, and etc. So our individual rights must take a back seat to our responsibilities to others.

And that can be seen as a compelling argument .... but according to Ted Kuntz of Vaccine Choice Canada, the evidence is clear that the vaccine is not safe and the vaccines also do not protect the people taking them ... and do not protect others. In other words, the whole story we've been told can be questioned. In fact just last week, in mid-October of 2022, a senior Pfizer executive, testifying before the European Parliament stated that the vaccine had not even been TESTED for its impact on transmission. And this was in part because there was simply no time to do this kind of testing because the vaccine was so important it had to be put on the market as soon as possible. So why were we told we were protecting others by getting this vaccine when there was no scientific evidence that this was in fact true?

So there are real questions if the vaccines are safe, and there are real questions about if they protect against either infection of the vaccinated person OR transmission to others. In fact one could argue that most of what we have been told is more of a marketing campaign than real science. And the same is true about masks and social distancing ... the science is at best questionable, with lots of science contradicting the ideas that masks or social distancing have ever been effective. But we're not told the truth, we're just told 'the official story' that all is well and 'do as you are told' because we can trust our government officials and media.

But according to Mr. Kuntz of VCC, the best science shows that neither the vaccines nor masks nor social distancing really work to protect us against Covid. We should therefore be very careful in believing what our Governments, Media, and the Vaccine Corporations are telling us. It is simply not safe, unfortunately, to trust them or believe them.

Some of the other news that grabbed my attention Oct 17 2022

From the https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/artificial-general-intelligence-is-not-as-imminent-as-you-might-think1/
Scientific American A close look reveals that the newest systems, including DeepMind’s much-hyped Gato, are still stymied by the same old problems

To the average person, it must seem as if the field of artificial intelligence is making immense progress. According to some of the more gushing media accounts and press releases, OpenAI's DALL-E 2 can seemingly create spectacular images from any text; another OpenAI system called GPT-3 can talk about just about anything—and even write about itself; and a system called Gato that was released in May by DeepMind, a division of Alphabet, reportedly worked well on every task the company could throw at it. One of DeepMind's high-level executives even went so far as to brag that in the quest to create AI that has the flexibility and resourcefulness of human intelligence—known as artificial general intelligence, or AGI—“the game is over.”.............

THE ATTACK ON INFORMED CONSENT:

Informed consent is a foundation of an ethical and moral health care system. According to the Canadian Medical Assn. informed consent must be voluntary, the participants must have the capacity to consent, and the participants must be properly informed.

If we look at the past two and a half years, and especially look at the issues surrounding the vaccination, then we can certainly say that the first element, that 'consent must be voluntary', was completely violated. The CMA says voluntary consent means there must be NO duress or coercion. That certainly did not happen. There has not only been coercion, one could say that there has been outright extortion. People have lost their jobs for not taking the vaccine; people have been banned from travelling freely and stopped from participating in the daily life of their communities - including being able to visit loved ones in hospitals or care homes in many cases. And much more than that.
As for the 'capacity to consent', young children were pressured and sometimes even bribed to get the shot; even without parental consent. And this was fully supported by our governments, media and public health officials.

And although the CMA says that informed consent includes people being fully informed, there was in fact little to no attempt to properly inform people of the costs and benefits of taking this vaccine. This is especially true since the clinical trials (on us) are still going on, so neither the benefits nor the costs were or are fully known, and yet we are constantly told that the vaccines are both safe and effective. Even though this is not really known.

At the same time, other treatments for Covid, such as Vitamin D, Hydroxychloroquine, Ivermectin and others that Front Line Doctors were using to successfully treat their patients, all of these were attacked, ridiculed or banned by the authorities, with doctors being fired for daring to use what they believed to be safe and successful treatment methods.

For informed consent to have happened, those taking the vaccine should have been clearly told that they are part of an experiment using a 'novel genetic technology' that's never been widely used before on people. Those who got the vaccine were not told this. People should also have been told that the real risks or benefits of the vaccines are unknow; which they are. And people should have been told that there are viable treatment alternatives that they could try. None of these things were done.
We have, it seems, lost the right to informed consent. It has been taken away from us. And we are going to have to fight to get it back.

TIPTOE TO TYRANNY: Premiering Oct. 29, 2022

Tiptoe to Tyranny is a 3 part series by Chris Harrigan looking into the world of vaccines and the pharmaceutical industry over the past several years including the Covid years. Part of the film covers an incident that took place in Canada back in 2019.

Two provinces in Canada, Ontario and New Brunswick, require school age children to get a full series of dozens of required vaccinations, or fill out a form asking for a religious or personal exemption. In 2019 the N.B. government and legislature were considering removing these exemptions. Vaccine Choice Canada (VCC)and a group of parents opposed this attack on the right to 'informed consent' and the right of parents to control the medications their children were getting.

The NB legislature decided to hold 3 days of public hearings on the bill. VCC and the parents brought in a group of experts to testify before the subcommittee looking at the bill - which was in the end defeated. According to VCC president Ted Kuntz, the feeling at the beginning of the hearings was that the subcommittee already had their minds made up and were just 'going through the process'. However, their feelings were changed by the experts brought in, who testified that childhood vaccines have NO long term safety studies done on them; that childhood vaccines, unlike all other medicines, are NOT tested against a placebo for safety and effectiveness, and that there is NO evidence that vaccinated children are healthier than unvaccinated children; and in fact there is scientific evidence to the contrary; that the unvaccinated children are healthier than those who have been vaccinated.

Mr. Kuntz believes that there was one particular event that had a major impact on the subcommittee. The Provincial Public Health Officer was testifying; she said that one of the reasons for bringing in this bill to remove vaccine exemptions was that 12 people in New Brunswick had contracted measles in the past year. And that was the result of some parents not vaccinating their children. A committee member asked the Public Health Officer how many of the 12 HAD been vaccinated. The doctor refused to answer that question. It was that refusal, to provide the subcommittee with that important piece of information, that had a real effect on the final decision to not pass the bill removing exemptions.

An FOI request was put in to get the information. It took over a year for the FOI to be answered. It turned out that of the 12 who got measles, 9 had been fully vaccinated, 2 had had one shot only, and the 12th was not vaccinated at all. This of course opens up a lot of questions about the entire idea of vaccine effectiveness. And the question of why this kind of information is kept so secret. And there is a huge body of evidence questioning the entire issue of childhood vaccine effectiveness that is simply never talked about in Canada; such is the power of the Pharmaceutical Industry.

Vacc

ARE CHILDHOOD VACCINES SAFE AND EFFECTIVE?

Canadian children are encouraged or forced to take many dozens of vaccine injections in the first fifteen years of life. The question must be asked .... are these vaccines safe and effective. According to Ted Kuntz, the president of Vaccine Choice Canada, there is simply no scientific proof that vaccines are safe and effective, even though we are always TOLD that they are ... told by our governments, our media and most doctors.

However, if you look, as Mr. Kuntz did after his son was badly harmed by a childhood vaccine, then you will find that it seems there is no proof that vaccines are safe and that there is no proof they are effective.
What you will find is a lack of scientific testing and data that show safety or effectiveness. There is also a lack of informed consent, becasue parents are not told the reality of the risks and the benefits. And there is also a real question whether any of these vaccines are even needed. What you will also find if you look ... is that a LOT of money is being made by vaccine companies.

Childhood vaccines are tested in a way that is different than most medicines. A new medicine may be tested for many years, with researchers watching to see what impacts the medicines may have. And the medicine is tested against a 'placebo group' so the health of those who take the medicine can be compared to those who don't.
Childhood vaccines on the other hand are followed only for a period of perhaps four weeks. Nobody is watching for long term impacts. There is also no placebo testing, so there is virtually no way to see if the vaccines have a negative health impact. Especially as parents of children who are immediately and negatively impacted by vaccines will almost always be told that the vaccines are safe and could not have harmed their children. That is the power of the vaccine corporations. There is no data to prove safety or efficacy of childhood vaccines - but we are told they are perfectly safe and very effective.

We are told that vaccines prevent lots of disease and save lots of lives. But this is NOT what the data says. If we look at the historical records of diseases such as measles, mumps, whooping cough, and all the rest ... we can see that the death rate for these diseases had declined by perhaps 95% BEFORE the vaccines were introduced. And we can see that after the vaccines were introduced the death rate just kept falling at the same rates. One can certainly argue, based on the actual historical health records, the vaccines seem to have had ZERO impact on health. But somehow that fact is never mentioned.

Instead, the vaccine corporations have taken credit for ALL of the declines in childhood disease and mortality, and as so often happens, no one dares question what they tell us. The 'Real Hero' in this story is Public Health Measures. As public health improved, the infectious diseases were reduced because everyone had clean water to drink, better sanitation, enough

A collection of a few head lines Oct 01 2022 not from the fake news outlets, Some iterms the other media does not think we need to know Sources for these is https://www.technocracy.news/ and https://www.technocracy.news/

The Lack of Science supporting the Heat based Exposure Limits in Canada’s Safety Code 6 (SC6)
(part 1)
A look at the non science and facts Health Canada uses to support their exposure limits in Safety Code 6 or there is a reason why many refer to Canada's Safety Code as the worst in the world, competition for that dubious honour from other countries.
Dr. Leif Salford in his presentation a the 1st HELLENIC CONGRESS - THE EFFECTS OF ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION Thessalonica, 24-25 May 2008, stated referring to EMR: Open quote
The world’s largest biological experiment ever? This was one of my messages in a lecture to the European Parliament in 2000 when the number of mobile phone users approached one fourth of the World’s population (Salford et al 2001) Today one third relies for the daily communication on mobile phones and base stations which send their energy into our bodies. Is this only of good? Or might it impose effects upon biology. Effects that we must anticipate and evaluate as far as possible, and if needed, reduce or avoid!
Life on earth was formed during billions of years, exposed to, and shaped by the original physical forces such as gravitation, cosmic irradiation, atmospheric electric fields and the terrestrial magnetism. The existing organisms are created to function in harmony with these forces. However, in the late 19th century mankind introduced the use of electricity, and high frequency RF was introduced in the 1950"s as FM and television and during the very last decades, microwaves of the modern communication society spread around the world. Until then microwaves had principally never been experienced on Earth.
Close quote
The Electromagnetic Radiation (EMR) experiment of the turn of the century is on going and has been expanded. As Dr. Salford notes we have always had physical sources of EMR from natural sources including cosmic irradiation, atmospheric electric fields and the terrestrial magnetism. The existing organisms are created to function in harmony with these forces. In the later part of the 1800’s man began develop and create electrical energy and began propagating and using Radio Frequency. The use of this energy and creation of various forms greatly accelerated in the 1950’s to a great extent as an outgrowth of technologies developed during WWII when the use of high frequency RF introduced in the 1950"s as FM and television and during the very last decades, and very disturbing is his observation that until the advent of the use of microwaves microwaves had principally never been experienced on Earth.
Doubt even Dr Salford envisioned the frequencies would increase with mmwaves. Life on earth never developed to cope with the new frequencies. Y
Can they show us science the current and proposed levels of radiation are safe? The guideline for many western governments comes from a Self appointed group of telco people the International Commission on Non-Ionising Radiation Protection (ICNIRP), it is a private by invitation only

250 Scientists with concerns about the harm Electromagnetic Radiation from Ear buds causes
Bit of a challenging exercise keeping a coherent line of talk while doing ones own scene switching in the background.
Yesterday, Saturday Sept 24, 2022 one of the articles in the various news feeds I collect raised the matter of the Global appeal https://emfscientist.org/index.php/emf-scientist-appeal to the UN signed by 250 + scientist re the harm caused by the proliferation of Electromagnetic Frequency in our environment.
I found the article in the Nedxus News feed https://nexusnewsfeed.com/ 250-scientists-highlight-concerns-with-earbuds https://nexusnewsfeed.com/article/home-family-pets/250-scientists-highlight-concerns-with-earbuds Ther article notes the ill effects are associatyed with Cancer
• Cellular stress
• Increase in harmful free radicals
• Genetic damages
• Structural and functional changes of the reproductive system
• Learning and memory deficits
• Neurological disorders
• Negative impacts on general well-being
Looks like a cross section of modern illnesses and health concerns of modern life.
Bit of a challenging exerc250 Scientists with concerns about the harm Electromagnetic Radiation from Ear buds causesise keeping a coherent line of talk while doing ones own scene switching in the background.
Yesterday, Saturday Sept 24, 2022 one of the articles in the various news feeds I collect raised the matter of the Global appeal https://emfscientist.org/index.php/emf-scientist-appeal to the UN signed by 250 + scientist re the harm caused by the proliferation of Electromagnetic Frequency in our environment.
I found the article in the Nedxus News feed https://nexusnewsfeed.com/ 250-scientists-highlight-concerns-with-earbuds https://nexusnewsfeed.com/article/home-family-pets/250-scientists-highlight-concerns-with-earbuds Ther article notes the ill effects are associatyed with Cancer
• Cellular stress
• Increase in harmful free radicals
• Genetic damages
• Structural and functional changes of the reproductive system
• Learning and memory deficits
• Neurological disorders
• Negative impacts on general well-being
Looks like a cross section of modern illnesses and health concerns of modern life.

Ted Kuntz founded Vaccine Choice Canada after his son was horribly injured by a vaccine he was given early in life. This was a terrible crime, because our Governments - and the Pharmaceutical Industry - both knew that the vaccines could be dangerous to children. But in Canada, big business is so powerful that Mr. Kuntz and his wife were never told about the risks and they and their son were forced to pay a terrible price for decades. It is very possible that the entire vaccine story we are told is a pack of lies. It is very possible that vaccines are both ineffective and unsafe. So we don't need them and they are dangerous. But they are also very profitable .... so here we are.

Because there is big money in vaccines - everyone lies. Health Canada, who approves these vaccines, lie to us about safety and effectiveness. The media, who always pretend to be our great friend, they refuse to report the truth. All the Corporate Journalists on Television, Radio, the Newspapers and etc... not one of them ever dares report the truth about vaccines because they know the truth is not allowed and they would be fired immediately if they said something outside of 'the official story'.

We are always told that vaccines are safe and effective. They are a great miracle of modern medicine. Vaccines have saved the health and lives of countless numbers of children. We are so lucky to have vaccines.
But there is a great deal of evidence that vaccines did not save children and get rid of the diseases. We talk about that evidence in the video. There is a lot of evidence that the healthiest children are the ones with the least amount of vaccinations. There is a real risk that vaccines are dangerous. There is evidence that vaccinated children will have more health problems for their whole lives. We talk about that evidence.
We discuss the link between vaccines and autism. We talk about the way the U.S. CDC hid the evidence of that link between vaccines and autism. We ask why the media will not report that and how our governments don't care and pretend it is all safe.

Things are a mess in Canada folks. This vaccine scandal, the betrayal of us all for corporate profit, is just one tip of the iceberg.

Believe it or not, a Proportional Voting system can give us a better democracy.
A proportional voting system will give us citizens MORE power, and take a bit of power away from those at the top who now have ALL the power.

At least, a Proportional Voting System will give us the Governments we actually VOTE FOR. The goal of a Proportional Voting system is to give political parties SEATS in Parliament based on the VOTES they actually get. So a political party that gets 15% or 25% of the votes ... will also get 15% or 25% of the seats.

Our current voting system, called First Past The Post, does NOT give parties seats based on the number of votes they get. First Past the Post gives the bigger parties EXTRA seats. A LOT of extra seats. And that seems unfair because it gives some voters a lot more "power" than other voters. And why should I as a voter be penalized just because I support a smaller party.

Here's an example from the last Ontario election.

Voting systems ARE important. If we had a Proportional Voting system in Ontario, we would not have a Doug Ford Conservative Government in Ontario because The Conservatives only got 40.8% of the votes.

POLITICAL PARTY % OF VOTE SEATS VOTES NEEDED TO WIN A SEAT

Conservatives 40.8% 83 23,000
NDP 23.7% 31 36,000

Liberals 23.8% 8 140,000
Green 5.9% 1 279,000

Independent 1

WITH A PROPORTIONAL VOTING SYSTEM .... we would probably have an NDP, Liberal Green Coalition Government. That coalition would have about 54% of the votes, instead of the 41% the Conservatives got. Now perhaps, there could be a Conservative Liberal Coaliton .... representing about 64% of voters.

COALITION GOVERNMENTS: In Proportional Voting systems, Coalition Governments are used. If one party actually gets more than 50% of the votes, which is unusual ... they can form a government by themselves. But usually, two or more parties will form a coalition that has more than 50% of the votes and seats.

IN ONTARIO, we would probably have, as I said, an NDP, Liberal, Green coalition. Or maybe a Conservative / Liberal coalition.
This is good in a couple of ways.
FIRST, it means that at least our governments represent more than half of us ... in the current Ontario government, only 41% of voters are 'represented'.
And second, it brings more voices into government. In Ontario, Doug Ford personally has a huge amount of power, and

Covid mandate experiences of a “small fringe minority of Concerned Citizens” in the Maple Ridge/ Pitt Meadows area of British Columbia.
In early 2020 an army of public health experts invaded theirs and every persons TV global with with a singular message about SARS Covid 19 and the life threatening seriousness of Covid 19 and a relentless drive to vaccinate us and our children. Could we trust the message of our governments about how serious the pandemic was?
This video is the story of some who did not trust the government, the media or world health organisations. An LPN working on the Covid unit at the Langely Memorial hospital reports empty bed, a unit operating at under 50% capacity while the main stream media and government were reporting the covid units was over capacity. Her unit went from 20 patient beds pre pandemic to at times as low as 6 patients to a maximum of 12 patients.
Why so much concern about an illness with all the symptoms of a flu just a different strain.
There were so many things the government and media were saying so many things that did not make sense, too much of the official information made no sense and many were suspicious from the beginning/ The narrative seemed to be straight out of a 2010 paper by the Rockefeller Foundation and reinforced by a games scenario in 2019 sponsored by Bill Gates et all. The more people questioned and thought about the narrative and trusted the official government and media version less and less. The more they thought about the narrative the less they trusted the official narrative.

We're told we have record inflation ... and it's true that prices are going up everywhere. And we're told that the solution is ...higher interest rates. We have to raise interest rates to tame the demon of inflation. But we don't know if that is true. What is the cause of inflation. Record profits are being made by many corporations and banks ... is this causing inflation? And if it is, how is higher interest rates going to help us? We also have supply chain shortages and a lot of impacts from the disastrous ongoing War in Ukraine. Higher interest rates won't help with that either.
So why are we raising interest rates ...which will hurt those at the bottom the most. And is this the next step in The Great Reset?
I think one can make a case that this IS the next step in The Great Reset. We can argue that this is being quite deliberately done to us. And if that is true then the only solution possible is to replace our governments and media because they are the ones who have led us into all of these messes.