So much to say on the topic, but not much productive came out! (Much like inalienable rights, NDA's being unconstitutional seems self evident to me.) [I neglected to mention the intertwinement of intellectual property, too!]

Making this helped me understand the efficiency of the process. (The last minute by itself-- with Shotcut and Audacity -- took as long to put together as the rest!) [Novices -- or, people who try something different and fail -- help us appreciate professionals?]

Everyone starts somewhere.

The text is too long for the description, but I included it towards the end. (I'll do my best to condense!) [Pixelation makes it difficult to read, but I included the full text on Minds -- @Gloony -- which will remain pinned until my next update; though, this might be an exception.]

In the original text, I referred to psychological manipulation as 5th generational warfare -- which it is; and, I neglected to mention such while filming -- but had not heard about ESG policies at the time, which are arguably the means. (Hopefully simply knowing about it is enough to thwart the agenda?) [Could behavioral scientists ever replicate the Milgram Experiment, if all the participants already knew about the Milgram Experiment?]

I used to think that merely withdrawing consent was enough -- and it might be -- but the internet provides us with ways to resist like never before! (I really like what O'Keefe is doing with OMG, and I hope he remains successful during Project Veritas' litigation against him, just as I hope Tucker Carlson defeats Fox News.) [Surely, the First Amendment prohibits governments from enforcing contracts that violate the same?]

I plan on doing a pure open-source video -- expect horrible quality -- soon, with just a Pine phone and Pi. (Although, the Pine phone is essentially a smaller, more capable Pi; I might be able to do everything on it alone!) [I also plan on doing more with OBS; maybe make a video, and edit it in real-time like a newscast; but, I might be getting ahead of myself!]

Went back and added a little intro music and intro-graphic, which threw the timing for everything else off. (Fixed it as best I could?)

I just mention it for posterity, but if you want to check out Seymour Hersh's allegations, here is a link to his Substack article:

https://seymourhersh.substack.com/p/how-america-took-out-the-nord-stream

It's been a while. (Somebody has been watching these?) [Hey NSA, Five Eyes, and CCP!]

Always late! (Transfer problems were magically fixed with a restart?)

If you really, truly want to do something, you'll find a way to accomplish your goal, regardless of the obstacles in your way. (There's never a better time to start, than now!)

Maybe writing the description first will deter me from meandering? (Hah!)

Merry – happy; jolly? – “Insurrection Day”!

I started to lead with that – attempting to convert a solemn anniversary into one of celebration, mimicking the “Let’s go Brandon!” slogan, which mocked censorship – but the ones who should be happiest pretend not to be.

Debate about voting irregularities was effectively squashed after Congress resumed that night. Previously, courts rejected evidence and attempts to prove voter fraud, generally because the person bringing the case lacked legal standing. This day and place – January 6th at the Capitol – was where the electoral votes were to be officially certified. Representative Gosar – who was recently dragged through the mud for sharing a poorly edited anime cartoon, where certain colleagues’ images were superimposed on some characters [the House eventually censured him and he lost a committee position] – was in the process of disputing Arizona when rioters interfered. Nary a peep upon reconvening. (Presumably, they feared being associated with the “insurrectionists” and furthering that narrative?)

Democrats got their way; yet, they’re still glum! (They won’t be happy until everyone suffers equally under their socialism; but then again, even that might not do.)

Over 700 people are still incarcerated over this – many in solitary [isolation units] – and the January 6th [whitewash] commission has yet to comment on the “Ray Epps breach theory,” if they ever even acknowledge it at all. ( https://www.revolver.news/2021/10/meet-ray-epps-the-fed-protected-provocateur-who-appears-to-have-led-the-very-first-1-6-attack-on-the-u-s-capitol/ ) [Oh, and, despite this being called an insurrection – and the perpetrators insurrectionists – no one has been charged with such!]

They don’t plan on slowing down, either. Now, they want to go after people who instigated or supported the demonstrations, regardless of actual participation in the riots. (Meanwhile, who shot Ashli Babbitt?) [Michael Byrd, unofficially.]

The whole event was rotten from the start, but legacy media loves regurgitating spoilage. (“A man is no less a slave because he is allowed to choose a new master once in a term of years.” – Lysander Spooner)

“Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." (John F. Kennedy) [With that being said, don’t hurt people or damage their property – the product of their time and labor – regardless of revolution or rebellion.]

If I hear the word “democracy” one more time… [then, I might make a video!]

I've been meaning to eventually attach this bit I wrote years ago. Now seems appropriate:

"Elections are glorified polls that proponents of the State use to justify dominance. The outcome is binding and everyone must adhere to the results, regardless of individual participation; presumably. 'Statists' – essentially, authoritarians – often ignore the absurdity of establishing and supporting such a system, opting to stress the supposed importance of participating in said politics instead. Untangling those convoluted thought processes requires more than words, and attempting to do so via this medium would likely be a waste of time, at this point. Instead, this article is directed at the like-minded, who understand that government in its current incarnation is immoral and wrong, but haven’t broken out of the traditional way of nation-state thinking, yet. Can governments exist within anarchy? Initially, the question might appear as a rhetorical oxymoron. By definition, anarchy consists of *no government*; or, more accurately, *no rulers*, but more on that later.

Most people stop there, without thinking about the concept itself. We all know that words can be deceptive, though. Just as renaming theft or extortion to something else – say, 'taxation'? – does not change the nature of the action; neither does the costume one wears. (But, don’t we all wear costumes, in some form or another? Sorry, I don’t mean to turn this into one of THOSE!)

Any newbies that are still hanging around? Excellent. Thank the desired 500 word minimum for this brief interlude. Let’s discuss rights. Life, liberty, property? Sure. A better way: As long as your actions don’t harm another, consider it a right. Do you have a right to healthcare? Sure. Do you have a right to forcefully take others’ money to accomplish it? No! Lather, rinse, repeat for anything that is subsidized sans voluntary transactions.

Sending others to intervene in a situation where you, yourself, would hesitate is dastardly; but, who is more culpable in the resulting action: the person who sends the collector, or the one who collects? Both are culpable, but the one committing the action is most reprehensible of all; for, without committing the deed, no one would have been wronged.

But, back to anarchy! Let’s be practical. Without militaries or physical impediments of some sort, national borders are as illusory as the security these provisions proclaim to provide. Regions within a national border are further classified into states, counties, and municipalities. Through these jurisdictions – the individuals working within those departments, rather – 'the law of the land' is enforced. The plots shrink, and fences replace borders. That’s the generally accepted conception, at least. I posit that these enforcers are the true rulers, whether they purport to be or not. But, this doesn’t stop with governments. Everywhere – school, work, home – there are hierarchies; especially in the animal kingdom. How, then, can I plausibly state that you live in anarchy, without rulers? Unless you’re actively being coerced, you’re free. Even while being harassed or threatened, you can still choose how you handle the situation. This is where I’m supposed to talk about self defense, relate it all back to anarchy, and close with Solzhenitsyn; but violence usually isn’t the answer. Sometimes it’s easy to forget that those perpetuating these systems sincerely believe that they are helping, even as they jeopardize the lives of both their victims and themselves via their unnecessary interventions. Viewing the world through this lens removes some of the abstraction from government, and allows you to see it for what it really is. Topics from sanctions down to speeding tickets become more fungible, but outside of the regular pattern of personal interactions – it becomes clear that other mechanisms are employed. (Control over financial institutions and killer robots come to mind.)

A piece of paper won’t prevent abuse. People have a better chance, but not without communication and education. Without respect, logic becomes muted. (That is to say, no one wants to listen to a smart ass.)"

I don't say it until the end, but: Thank you for the feedback, mylo! (You certainly surprised me!)

I could still retroactively change the cover without mentioning any of this, but I was trying to highlight my mistake as a learning opportunity. (I think I'll sanitize -- remove potential information that could be used to dox me; please don't play that game; it helps no one -- some of the footage and release it all with a final product later, in a playlist.)

The problem with not doing stuff the "right way" first, is you spend more time than you should cleaning up the mess afterwards.

"Our" legal systems should not be in the state that they are; but, peaceful change via protest and civil disobedience is the only real option. (Violence and hatred just get you more of the same.) [Maybe Ghislaine Mawells's plight will lead to prison reform?]

I'm using this channel as my medium to express my views, so I refrain from inundating and alienating those around me. This stuff needs to be talked about, but the platforms for free speech -- and discussions like this -- are diminishing online. (Does Tracebook still block the RPF domain?)

I said I'd leave a description for the onegreatworknetwork.com in the video, but they may not want to be affiliated with stuff like this! (Anyone ever watch that Tommy Chong movie, "It's Gawd!"?)

The meme cover of Ghislaine Maxwell might be tasteless, but if I didn't feel guilty about making it, then I wouldn't have felt the urge to research her current status. (Guards have allegedly been abusing her.) [But, as bad as her treatment might be, let it shed light on the broken judicial system of America!]

A British court wouldn't extradite Assange, arguably because of Epstein, since I'm still on both topics.

bastiat.org/en/the_law.html

"Is there any need to offer proof that this odious perversion of the law is a perpetual source of hatred and discord; that it tends to destroy society itself? If such proof is needed, look at the United States [in 1850]. There is no country in the world where the law is kept more within its proper domain: the protection of every person's liberty and property. As a consequence of this, there appears to be no country in the world where the social order rests on a firmer foundation. But even in the United States, there are two issues — and only two — that have always endangered the public peace.

What are these two issues? They are slavery and tariffs. These are the only two issues where, contrary to the general spirit of the republic of the United States, law has assumed the character of a plunderer.

Slavery is a violation, by law, of liberty. The protective tariff is a violation, by law, of property. [Look at the dozens -- if not hundreds -- of taxes now!]

It is a most remarkable fact that this double legal crime — a sorrowful inheritance from the Old World — should be the only issue which can, and perhaps will, lead to the ruin of the Union. It is indeed impossible to imagine, at the very heart of a society, a more astounding fact than this: The law has come to be an instrument of injustice. And if this fact brings terrible consequences to the United States — where the proper purpose of the law has been perverted only in the instances of slavery and tariffs — what must be the consequences in Europe, where the perversion of the law is a principle; a system?"

At what point do "unintended consequences" become quite intentional? (Governments -- with that manner of solving everything with either coercion or money -- exacerbate the very problems they intend to solve.)

I never say anything to this effect, but it's true: Access to [accurate, factual] information diminishes the power of propaganda.

"PSYOP THE STEAL," by Millie Weaver: https://www.bitchute.com/video/sWzWip1B1n2G/

tldw; The "Big Lie" has nothing to do with Trump or Biden, but society itself. The "Big Lie" is that governments protect you or your rights; or that a piece of paper grants them that authority in the first place. (The truth is that they have become the most prevalent violators!)

To quote Matt Kibbe, "Don't hurt people and don't take their stuff." (This philosophy should apply to all sentient beings, not just humans!)

Taxation is extortion, a form of theft. (You have a right to <X> -- health care, protection, whatever -- but you do NOT have the right to force others to subsidize those desires.)

Maybe I'll delve into intentions, results, and government tomorrow. (This description is probably more applicable to it -- what will be -- than this!)

I wasn't going to post anything, until I saw this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bZ4NTdSK5ac

Satanism isn't limited to Hollywood, political elites, or Free Masons. (You might be one, and not even know it!)

Practice mindfulness. (Care about caring!)

None

I didn't intend to go through this whole process initially, only introduce GIMP and some of the elements of graphical editing. Whoops. (Encoding those files individually to mp4 was unnecessary!)

I shouldn't have swapped microphones at the 18 minute mark, but I'm leaving it for posterity. (Maybe I'll find a way to boost the audio on it and make a video about that.)

It's not worth watching after that, unless you're just curious about continuity. (I didn't go into uploading; if Bitchute doesn't process this one [fast enough?] I might have to try Odysee or some other platform instead.)

The streaming option on OBS probably would have simplified this process and made everything much easier. (But, you live; you learn?)

Lest you become what you loathe!

If you haven't checked out Mark Passio -- start his series from the beginning @ whatonearthishappening.com. (Too many people are clueless about rights, tending to believe they come from governments -- or some type of authority, in general -- rather than being inalienable.)

"The Great Work" might as well be "The Great Commission" by another name.

Read the title, and you really don't even have to watch the video! (I'll get better as I go along?)

Text is great for clarifying thought, but the meandering, haphazard method of videography has its own perks!