Andy talks about the existence of the virus in front of Del "Virushugger" Big tree.

Nobel Prize winner Kary Mullis explains how it could be a misuse to claim that the result of a PCR test is meaningful. He then goes on to say that the real misuse is that you don't need to test for HIV or any of the other ten thousand retroviruses.

TRANSCRIPT:
“If they can find this virus in you at all, and with PCR if you do it well, you can find almost anything in anybody, it starts making you believe the sort of Buddhist notion that everything is contained in everything else. Right, I mean, Cause if you can amplify one single molecule up to something that you can really measure, which PCR can do, then there there’s just very few molecules that you don’t have at least one single one of them in your body. Ok. So that could be thought of as a misuse of it, just to claim that its meaningful. But, the real misuse of it is that you don’t need to test for HIV, you don’t need to test for the other ten thousand retroviruses that are unnamed also in the subject, see somebody that’s got HIV generally is going to have almost anything that you can test for because they have definitely, HIV is a fairly rare virus. There’s only one-million of us out of 250-300 million people in America that have that virus. So you have to get around, either your mother had to have it and pass it to you or you have to really be paying a lot of attention to people that do have it and paying only attention to them and you got a pretty good chance of getting it that way. Its hard to get it but if you have it there’s a good chance you’ve also got a lot of other ones cause you’ve been in the market, for, its been possible for you to get a lot of, its, its, to test for that one and say that has any special meaning is what I think is the problem. Not that PCR has been misused. Its like…Its not an estimation, it’s a really quantitative thing. It tells you something about nature and about whats there. But it,(PCR) it allows you to take a very miniscule amount of anything and make it measurable and then talk about it in meetings and stuff like it is important. You see that’s not a misuse, that’s just sort of a misinterpretation.

(Question from Audience)

It is. There’s very little of what they call HIV. And whats been brought out here by Phil Pot, The measurement for it is not, is not exact at all. Its not as good for our measurement for things like apples. An apple is an apple. You know, you can get something that’s kind of like, if you got enough things that look kind of like an apple and you stick them all together you might think it was an apple. And HIV is like that. Those tests are all based on things that are invisible and the results are inferred in a sense. PCR is separate from that, its just a process that’s used to make a whole of something out of something. It is not, it doesn’t tell that you’re sick and it doesn’t tell you that the thing you ended up with, really was going to hurt you or anything like that.

Original video from Monky Games @ YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yg5qnmqjWsM
Check out the 2.5 hour highly recommended video from Spacebusters where the steps in this video are explained in much more detail plus much more: https://www.bitchute.com/video/YKktYdEGBRnP/

Original article:
https://www.prisonplanet.com/david-icke-the-global-spiritual-awakening-of-humanity.html

Sorry for the video cutting off at the end. This is the longest version of this interview that I could find.