Wiki World Order

I’ve never actually met any “Science Deniers” who don’t believe that such methods can increase knowledge. IMHO, greater risks stem from more numerous and influential “Rights Deniers.” [Denying risks of democide also costs countless lives most decades.]

I condemn any restrictions on the basic rights of anyone, whatever they believe, absent direct physical harm. We must be smart enough to find solutions which protect both the vulnerable and basic rights.

Here in Maryland, Governor Hogan’s “Stay At Home Order” was “to be enforced by state and local law enforcement. Knowingly and willfully violating this order is a misdemeanor, and on conviction, offenders may be subject to imprisonment not exceeding one year or a fine not exceeding $5,000 or both.”

This might not seem like a big deal, especially if it is not enforced very often. But this is a legal precedent the Governor also plans to enforce for future seasons of COVID-19 or other viruses. This is fundamentally unacceptable for a presumably natural threat which kills less than 1% of people it attacks. I am happy to voluntarily wear a mask in public places if appropriate, but please condemn the suspension of our basic rights.

Populations who have their rights removed are more likely to be harmed by governments. Being jailed, or fined with the threat of jail, does harm. I am deeply offended that I lived under these threats for a month and a half. As someone living with psychological trauma from police, this has not been good for my health.

I don’t know how many millions of American lives have been taken or destroyed by the “War on Drugs” over my lifetime — that’s from an attempt to help a public health issue. But the response to COVID-19 includes many steps to further “close” our “free” society.

If the media and public is encouraging the United States to behave more like China, at some point they need to take seriously the risk assessments of totalitarian or authoritarian governance. The exponentially scaled impacts of governance is not trivial, and not a joke.

https://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/20TH.HTM
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democide

If you don’t trust your neighbors enough to live in a free country with representative governance, and you cannot afford to move to a more repressive society, then perhaps you should support your state’s secession. If you want to threaten me with arrest for leaving my home, then I do not consent to cohabitation with you.

Of course, any forced vaccinations in the future would also violate my informed consent. I do not even want to be friends with people who want to force anything inside my body without consent. “Would you like some tea? Here is all the science so you can choose to enjoy it and make the world better.”

Just some food for thought.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oQbei5JGiT8

Cross-Posted:
https://medium.com/@wikiworldorder/science-denial-rights-denial-471d7a84f202
https://steemit.com/politics/@wikiworldorder/science-denial-rights-denial
http://wikiworldorder.org/2020/05/28/science-denial-rights-denial/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vCZ_ZQBUIow

Post: https://steemit.com/politics/@wikiworldorder/drug-use-and-pandemics-as-public-health-issues

The COVID-19 pandemic was declared a full-blown “state of emergency” in most jurisdictions, like a 9/11-scale event. But do you remember when big public health issues did not require a “war footing”? Approaching 40 years old, I sure don’t.

Drugs should be a public health issue again, because the war against drugs has always done far more harm than [illicit] drug use itself. Pandemics are also public health issues, and should only be turned into wars in far more deadly situations, I think 10x-100x worse than COVID-19. Wars are always filled with fogs of unaccountability, collateral murders, profiteering, and known and unknown atrocities. For reasons like these, it is always necessary to question the premises of any type of war.
...
If you don't think we already have some kind of police state, then where is the line for you?
...
Given the observable context throughout my life, why would I trust these institutions to try to save hypothetical lives on black-swan-level, while we the people can't get it to stop proactively destroying hundreds of thousands of other lives? Few have decent track records in my book.

Cross-Posted:
https://steemit.com/politics/@wikiworldorder/drug-use-and-pandemics-as-public-health-issues
http://wikiworldorder.org/2020/05/28/drug-use-and-pandemics-as-public-health-issues/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GPzqZJDVo8I

Post: https://medium.com/@wikiworldorder/drug-use-and-pandemics-as-public-health-issues-ad0f2840b27d

The COVID-19 pandemic was declared a full-blown “state of emergency” in most jurisdictions, like a 9/11-scale event. But do you remember when big public health issues did not require a “war footing”? Approaching 40 years old, I sure don’t.

Drugs should be a public health issue again, because the war against drugs has always done far more harm than [illicit] drug use itself. Pandemics are also public health issues, and should only be turned into wars in far more deadly situations, I think 10x-100x worse than COVID-19. Wars are always filled with fogs of unaccountability, collateral murders, profiteering, and known and unknown atrocities. For reasons like these, it is always necessary to question the premises of any type of war.
...
If you don't think we already have some kind of police state, then where is the line for you?
...
Given the observable context throughout my life, why would I trust these institutions to try to save hypothetical lives on black-swan-level, while we the people can't get it to stop proactively destroying hundreds of thousands of other lives? Few have decent track records in my book.

Cross-Posted:
https://steemit.com/politics/@wikiworldorder/drug-use-and-pandemics-as-public-health-issues
http://wikiworldorder.org/2020/05/28/drug-use-and-pandemics-as-public-health-issues/
https://www.bitchute.com/video/7r2jw5oRkock/

CDC Observational Data updated May 8 is compared with approximations of Imperial College Model Projections from March 16.

Post w/ more links:
https://steemit.com/politics/@wikiworldorder/revisiting-imperial-risk-assessments-of-covid-19-may-12
https://medium.com/@wikiworldorder/revisiting-imperial-risk-assessments-of-covid-19-may-12-503f76eeab82
http://WikiWorldOrder.org/2020/05/13/revisiting-imperial-risk-assessments-of-covid-19/

Data Sources:
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/COVID19/
https://data.cdc.gov/Health-Statistics/Deaths-from-Pneumonia-and-Influenza-P-I-and-all-de/pp7x-dyj2
https://www.imperial.ac.uk/media/imperial-college/medicine/sph/ide/gida-fellowships/Imperial-College-COVID19-NPI-modelling-16-03-2020.pdf

My Math & Hypotheticals:
http://wikiworldorder.org/dox/imperial-risk-assessment-200512.ods

On March 16, 2020, the London “Imperial College COVID-19 Response Team” led by Neil Ferguson published their “Report 9: Impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) to reduce COVID-19 mortality and healthcare demand”. This report was very widely shared on mainstream media, social media, and by policymakers. I interpreted this report to be a primary driver of the atmosphere under which policy discussions are still limited.

I’ve been wondering how their model projections have corresponded to the observational data we have thus far. Unfortunately, they do not provide predictions in any formats that can be readily matched with what little data is actually reported by the CDC, etc. Perhaps models intended to inform public policy should always predict specific hard measurements over time for later comparison. How else can policymakers and voters verify the accuracy or efficacy of a given policy?

So for my next thought experiment, I have graphed a few hypothetical projections on top of the 2010-2018 Historical Average of All Deaths Reported Weekly. In this graph, the dark blue line on top is the raw observational data for All Deaths Reported Weekly in 2020 as of May 8. The most recent few weeks in that observational data are clearly missing a lot of reports because the WorldOMeters website has reported over 80,000 COVID-19 deaths in the U.S. cumulatively. So I’ve manually constructed the orange line as a projected/artificial/fabricated/fake set of COVID-19 deaths which represents the ballpark shape of 80,000 Excess COVID-19 Deaths through May 10 — stacked on top of the Historical Average of All Deaths Reported Weekly.

Next, I constructed a hypothetical curve close to the Imperial College’s Projected COVID-19 Deaths if they were reported weekly. With ample trial and error, I was able to roughly simulate the time frame (May~August) and peak intensity with my curve, while getting the area under the curve to total 2,200,000 American deaths from COVID-19. I then scaled this same curve to also simulate 1,100,000 and 300,000 deaths occurring before the end of August. Each of these Projected Excess COVID-19 Weekly Death simulations was then stacked on the Historical Average of All Deaths Reported Weekly for the accurate reference.
...
Open society back up now, while focusing on:
- Protecting nursing homes, assisted living, and other vulnerable populations
- Repairing those with lives destroyed by the reactions to the virus
Make American [Partially] Free Again

Cross-Posted:
https://youtu.be/7hjVhvgNlhQ

---

Some related videos I recommend…

The Failure of Expert Predictions and Models | The Coronavirus and Public Policy
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mG2vdyfLv7U

Why lockdowns are the wrong policy - Swedish expert Prof. Johan Giesecke
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bfN2JWifLCY

Perspectives on the Pandemic | Dr. John Ioannidis Update: 4.17.20 | Episode 4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cwPqmLoZA4s

The Coronavirus and the Constitution | The Coronavirus and Public Policy
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rlcl72is3EU

Shelter in Place with Shane Smith & Edward Snowden (Full Episode)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k5OAjnveyJo

Post & Sources: https://steemit.com/politics/@wikiworldorder/governor-hogan-s-science-based-health-policies-an-information-request-experiment

Science-based policies have the awesome potential to be transparent throughout their logic, assumptions, uncertainties, and data.

Societies are evolving their relationships with science, and any branches of government should logically be able to share their work when it comes to any science-based policy — by definition. I will always support evidence-based policy over “policymaking based on ideology or ‘common sense'”. I assume everyone is doing their best with the information available. But like ethical science, representative governance requires the informed consent of the governed.

Scientific citations do not need to be included within laws or executive orders, but they at least need to be published somewhere for citizen oversight of evidence-based policies. Most laymen might still just trust their science-minded friend’s take on it, but that friend would actually have a clear understanding of the largest experiments that societies run. I have been looking for the controlled experiments which inform the most extreme new policies in Maryland.

If you too have wanted to understand the science behind your governor’s unprecedented public health policies, perhaps more voters and journalists need to demand such baselines of accountability in the new normal. I am just documenting my attempts to gather the facts which might dispel floods of misinformation…

Dear Office of the Governor:

Living most of my life in Maryland, I appreciate your tireless efforts during these unprecedented times.

Under the Maryland Public Information Act Title 4, I am requesting an opportunity to inspect or obtain copies of public records. I am requesting a list of all the studies which informed the Governor’s public health policies in response to the COVID-19 virus and pandemic. I am requesting a list of all the studies or evidence that informed the Department of Health’s recommendations to the Governor. I am also requesting a list of any studies or evidence that informed the Governor’s experts who advised him on these science-based policies.

Most specifically, I am requesting a list of public health studies that informed policies ordering “all non-essential businesses and other establishments” [close], and “requiring all persons to stay at home” outside of essential needs (Order Number 20-03-30-01). There were no health studies cited in the Governor’s Order nor its press release. Scientific citations and sources should be transparently published on/throughout coronavirus.maryland.gov. They would help clear up misinformation about the science. Are they elsewhere?

If there are any fees for searching or copying these records, please inform me if the cost will exceed $40. However, I would also like to request a waiver of all fees in that the disclosure of the requested information is in the public interest and will contribute significantly to the public’s understanding of science-based policy. This information is not being sought for commercial purposes.

The Maryland Public Information Act requires a response to this request within 30 days. If access to the records I am requesting will take longer than this amount of time, please contact me with information about when I might expect copies or the ability to inspect the requested records.

If you deny any or all of this request, please cite each specific exemption you feel justifies the refusal to release the information and notify me of the appeal procedures available to me under the law.

Thank you for considering my request.

Sincerely,
Morgan Lesko

I will be patient in waiting for replies, and will share any appropriate information after it’s been collected. This is a strategy I’ve developed in hopes on increasing clarity on a novel state of emergency. Perhaps it is worth remixing here and elsewhere, both to encourage and to audit evidence-based policy making.

Cross-Posted:
https://medium.com/@wikiworldorder/governor-hogans-science-based-health-policies-an-information-request-experiment-86f4b1b5fe1c
http://wikiworldorder.org/2020/05/20/governor-hogans-science-based-health-policies-an-information-request-experiment/
https://youtu.be/-JM0T1niWcM

Post & Sources: http://wikiworldorder.org/2020/05/20/governor-hogans-science-based-health-policies-an-information-request-experiment/

Science-based policies have the awesome potential to be transparent throughout their logic, assumptions, uncertainties, and data.

Societies are evolving their relationships with science, and any branches of government should logically be able to share their work when it comes to any science-based policy — by definition. I will always support evidence-based policy over “policymaking based on ideology or ‘common sense'”. I assume everyone is doing their best with the information available. But like ethical science, representative governance requires the informed consent of the governed.

Scientific citations do not need to be included within laws or executive orders, but they at least need to be published somewhere for citizen oversight of evidence-based policies. Most laymen might still just trust their science-minded friend’s take on it, but that friend would actually have a clear understanding of the largest experiments that societies run. I have been looking for the controlled experiments which inform the most extreme new policies in Maryland.

If you too have wanted to understand the science behind your governor’s unprecedented public health policies, perhaps more voters and journalists need to demand such baselines of accountability in the new normal. I am just documenting my attempts to gather the facts which might dispel floods of misinformation…

Dear Office of the Governor:

Living most of my life in Maryland, I appreciate your tireless efforts during these unprecedented times.

Under the Maryland Public Information Act Title 4, I am requesting an opportunity to inspect or obtain copies of public records. I am requesting a list of all the studies which informed the Governor’s public health policies in response to the COVID-19 virus and pandemic. I am requesting a list of all the studies or evidence that informe..

2020, Creative Commons
GIFs: https://gph.is/g/4oRMvq5 , https://gph.is/g/ZyeYkde

“Unhappy events abroad have retaught us two simple truths about the liberty of a democratic people.

The first truth is that the liberty of a democracy is not safe if the people tolerate the growth of private power to a point where it becomes stronger than their democratic state itself. That, in its essence, is Fascism—ownership of Government by an individual, by a group, or by any other controlling private power.

The second truth is that the liberty of a democracy is not safe if its business system does not provide employment and produce and distribute goods in such a way as to sustain an acceptable standard of living.

Both lessons hit home.

Among us today a concentration of private power without equal in history is growing.

This concentration is seriously impairing the economic effectiveness of private enterprise as a way of providing employment for labor and capital and as a way of assuring a more equitable distribution of income and earnings among the people of the nation as a whole.”

“We believe in a way of living in which political democracy and free private enterprise for profit should serve and protect each other—to ensure a maximum of human liberty not for a few but for all.

It has been well said that “the freest government, if it could exist, would not be long acceptable, if the tendency of the laws were to create a rapid accumulation of property in few hands, and to render the great mass of the population dependent and penniless.”

Today many Americans ask the uneasy question: Is the vociferation that our liberties are in danger justified by the facts?”

“Even these statistics I have cited do not measure the actual degree of concentration of control over American industry.

Close financial control, through interlocking spheres of influence over channels of investment, and through the use of financial devices like holding companies and strategic minority interests, creates close control of the business policies of enterprises which masquerade as independent units.

That heavy hand of integrated financial and management control lies upon large and strategic areas of American industry. The small business man is unfortunately being driven into a less and less independent position in American life. You and I must admit that.

Private enterprise is ceasing to be free enterprise and is becoming a cluster of private collectivisms: masking itself as a system of free enterprise after the American model, it is in fact becoming a concealed cartel system after the European model.

We all want efficient industrial growth and the advantages of mass production. No one suggests that we return to the hand loom or hand forge. A series of processes involved in turning out a given manufactured product may well require one or more huge mass production plants. Modern efficiency may call for this. But modern efficient mass production is not furthered by a central control which destroys competition among industrial plants each capable of efficient mass production while operating as separate units. Industrial efficiency does not have to mean industrial empire building.

And industrial empire building, unfortunately, has evolved into banker control of industry. We oppose that.“

Franklin D. Roosevelt, 32nd President of the United States
Message to Congress on Curbing Monopolies.
April 29, 1938
https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/message-congress-curbing-monopolies

Cross-Posted:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HRu_zr-1-Iw
http://wikiworldorder.org/2020/04/25/franklin-d-roosevelt-on-familiar-fascism/

Regarding "9/11 Truth and the Silence of the IR Discipline", by David A. Hughes, Published 2020
"First, there is a review of the IR literature on 9/11, showing that it fails to address 9/11 truth. Second, the key findings of 9/11 truth are presented in summary form, drawing only on the type of sources mentioned above in order to avoid charges of parochialism. Third, there is a discussion of why IR scholars ignore 9/11 truth. Finally, the conclusion considers the implications of taking 9/11 truth seriously."
Essay Version: https://medium.com/@wikiworldorder/democracy-international-relations-discipline-and-9-11-truth-221b01224fb2

Do you believe in democracy? Then this debate is relevant and worthy of your attention. The abstract of this International Relations (IR) paper does not do it justice as the '28 pages' we were looking for. David Hughes has compiled a remarkable collection of the strongest 9/11 Truth evidence, and points out how little has been addressed or debunked in peer reviewed literature. In my personal experience, "9/11 Truthers" who have done more than watch a few documentaries have been familiar with most of this paper's key claims for at least a decade.

No groups are immune to groupthink. So please, academia, steel man the open source work instead of firing professors. We've been begging you for decades. Replicate open source studies and go deeper to shut us up with stronger evidence.
...
Due to inadequate skepticism toward expert authorities, "total deaths during the post-2001 U.S. wars in Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Pakistan and Yemen is likely to reach 3.1 million or more — around 200 times the number of U.S. dead."
...
The chasm growing between reality bubbles continues to expand, which is a serious risk to society and safety.
...
If we're not living under tyranny, then there are always valid reasons to challenge governmental claims to emergency powers. If not for your own protection, you must help stop this trend before it harms more of 'the others' whom it has already harmed.

Cross-Posted:
https://steemit.com/politics/@wikiworldorder/democracy-international-relations-discipline-and-9-11-truth
http://wikiworldorder.org/2020/04/24/democracy-international-relations-discipline-and-9-11-truth/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s-6XzM_QV-I

Essay & Footnotes: https://medium.com/@wikiworldorder/double-edges-of-exponential-scientism-a1f96f271869
If our society has representative governance, then everybody must be able to understand and question the basics of the scientific fields being used to govern us — a modern redress of grievances. Otherwise, how can we judge the actions of our elected officials? How else can we give informed consent with our votes for or against exponentially-impactful societal experiments?
...
It does not advance the goals of a more evidence-based-society to bully people or politics with scientific predictions that very well may be very wrong. No theory is too big to fail. Good science should be able to defend itself without bullies.
...
Do you think Technocratic and Representative governance are not mutually exclusive? To have both, you’ll have to wait until the vast majority of the society is significantly literate of science, exponential growth, and the uncertainty in your favorite non-linear model of the year. If that’s your utopia, I think you’ll have to get crackin’ in that direction, stream more intellectual debates with more than an hour in the weeds, and putting on your ‘patience hat’ for another 50 years. Sorry, not my utopia, not my problem.
...
When in Oceania, do as the Oceanians do. Panic into endless wars against invisible enemies, based on inadequate or privileged evidence. No, the military is not on most streets. No authority needs or wants to use physical control when they have mass mind control. If people were protesting or rioting in the streets, would you demand the militarized police enforce the scientific consensus? For now, there is still enough bread and circus for fun and chill in our Brave New World.
...
I still find it an extraordinary claim with insufficient evidence that the first 1–2,000 [or now 20,000] deaths in the U.S. will grow to some 1.1–2.2 million — the scale of predictions driving popular reactions. So I am also sad and scared about the totalitarian precedents set in reactions which thus far seem to be creating a much greater human and social harm. If the new normal is holding the world hostage with weak data, then we need to sit down and have a serious talk about our social arrangement.

Cross-Posted:
https://steemit.com/science/@wikiworldorder/double-edges-of-exponential-scientism
http://wikiworldorder.org/2020/03/29/double-edges-of-exponential-scientism/

(Published 1/8/17) "So, in 2008, Iceland's economy totally collapsed. And when the Icelandic people looked around to try to see what had failed them, they recognized it was their government, a corrupted government that had failed them. And so, they started a process to fix it. By crowdsourcing a new constitution. They first collected a thousand people at random who met together to discuss what the values of that constitution should be. And then they had an election where 500 people ran to serve on the commission that would draft the constitution. 25 were elected. And for four months, they drafted a constitution. Now, four months is about as long as our framers took to draft our Constitution, but our framers didn't post their drafts to Facebook every week. But the Icelanders did. And after that process, they produced a beautiful constitution which was then ratified by two-thirds of the Icelandic people in a national referendum. Now, that story is in many ways inspiring, but it's also humbling because, of course, Iceland is different in a thousand ways from the United States. But when you think of the courage that they had to do what they did, it makes this debate seem so small." (Dec 5, 2016)

Watch it all: http://www.intelligencesquaredus.org/debates/call-convention-amend-constitution

(Published 1/7/17) James Clapper, U.S. Director of National Intelligence, Jan 5, 2017: "I'm speaking personally, this is not an institutional response. As I commented earlier to Senator McCain, I do think we need a U.S. Information Agency on steroids that deals with the totality of the information realm, and to mount a -- in all forms, and to include social media."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Information_Agency
"The United States Information Agency (USIA), which existed from 1953 to 1999, was a United States agency devoted to public diplomacy. In 1999, USIA's broadcasting functions were moved to the newly created Broadcasting Board of Governors, and its exchange and non-broadcasting information functions were given to the newly created Under Secretary of State for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs at the U.S. Department of State. The agency was previously known overseas as the United States Information Service (USIS)."

Bloomberg LIVE: Intel Chiefs Testify on 2016 Campaign Hackings

U.S. Director of National Intelligence James Clapper testify before the Senate Armed Services Committee in Washington, about foreign cyber threats. Admiral Michael Rogers, director, National Security Agency, and Marcel Lettre, undersecretary of defense for intelligence, also are scheduled to testify.

Watch the whole thing: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XQZzRhorHTs&t=1h26m28s

===================

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Countering_Foreign_Propaganda_and_Disinformation_Act

"Countering Foreign Propaganda and Disinformation Act is a bipartisan bill which was introduced by the United States Congress on 10 May 2016. The bill was initially entitled the Countering Information Warfare Act.

The bipartisan legislation was written in March 2016 by U.S. Senators Rob Portman (R, OH) and Chris Murphy (D, CT). It was additionally introduced in the United States House of Representatives in a bipartisan fashion; co-sponsors included Congressmen Adam Kinzinger (R, IL) and Ted Lieu (D, CA).

In both the House and Senate the bill was included in the National Defense Authorization Act for fiscal year 2017. It passed the House in this fashion in a conference report vote on 2 December 2016. The Senate then passed the measure in a conference report on December 8 by a tally of 92–7.
...
On 23 December 2016, President Obama signed the 2017 National Defense Authorization Act into law."

More food for thought...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information_Awareness_Office

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Total_Information_Awareness

Post: http://WikiWorldOrder.org/2017/01/07/james-clapper-1517-we-need-a-u-s-information-agency-on-steroids/

(Published 1/6/17) James Clapper, U.S. Director of National Intelligence, Jan 5, 2017: "I'm speaking personally, this is not an institutional response. As I commented earlier to Senator McCain, I do think we need a U.S. Information Agency on steroids that deals with the totality of the information realm, and to mount a -- in all forms, and to include social media."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Information_Agency
"The United States Information Agency (USIA), which existed from 1953 to 1999, was a United States agency devoted to public diplomacy. In 1999, USIA's broadcasting functions were moved to the newly created Broadcasting Board of Governors, and its exchange and non-broadcasting information functions were given to the newly created Under Secretary of State for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs at the U.S. Department of State. The agency was previously known overseas as the United States Information Service (USIS)."

Bloomberg LIVE: Intel Chiefs Testify on 2016 Campaign Hackings

U.S. Director of National Intelligence James Clapper testify before the Senate Armed Services Committee in Washington, about foreign cyber threats. Admiral Michael Rogers, director, National Security Agency, and Marcel Lettre, undersecretary of defense for intelligence, also are scheduled to testify.

Watch the whole thing: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XQZzRhorHTs&t=1h26m28s

===================

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Countering_Foreign_Propaganda_and_Disinformation_Act

"Countering Foreign Propaganda and Disinformation Act is a bipartisan bill which was introduced by the United States Congress on 10 May 2016. The bill was initially entitled the Countering Information Warfare Act.

The bipartisan legislation was written in March 2016 by U.S. Senators Rob Portman (R, OH) and Chris Murphy (D, CT). It was additionally introduced in the United States House of Representatives in a bipartisan fashion; co-sponsors included Congressmen Adam Kinzinger (R, IL) and Ted Lieu (D, CA).

In both the House and Senate the bill was included in the National Defense Authorization Act for fiscal year 2017. It passed the House in this fashion in a conference report vote on 2 December 2016. The Senate then passed the measure in a conference report on December 8 by a tally of 92–7.
...
On 23 December 2016, President Obama signed the 2017 National Defense Authorization Act into law."

Post: http://WikiWorldOrder.org/2017/01/07/james-clapper-1517-we-need-a-u-s-information-agency-on-steroids/

(Published 11/13/16) Darrell Becker, Morgan Lesko, and Katie Stone try to start figuring out how to building bridges of empathy in this moment. No matter the outcome of the 2016's America's Next Top President, this country was always going to need the skills sets which Darrell Becker explores and teaches at VoluntaryVisions.com. Given Trump's victory, which seems to have surprised most of the world, our culture could benefit from building some of the most beautiful bridges of connection in human history.

Show Notes: http://WikiWorldOrder.org/2016/11/13/post-election-connection-with-darrell-becker-voluntary-visions

Audio Only: http://VoluntaryVisions.com/audio/Wiki-World-Order-Post-Election-Connection-With-Voluntary-Visions.mp3

Darrell Becker: http://VoluntaryVisions.com
Morgan Lesko: http://WikiWorldOrder.org
Katie Stone: http://GoGreenB.org

Sorry about my audio!

(Published 8/24/16) More: http://WikiWorldOrder.org/2016/08/24/please-compartmentalize-the-viability-of-conspiratorial-beliefs/

https://youtu.be/QSua9jLkqSg
^ Watch full reaction to: "On the Viability of Conspiratorial Beliefs", by David Robert Grimes in PLOS, January 26, 2016
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147905
-------
For the sake of argument, let’s say that five people can effectively keep a secret (and a cover story). This is perhaps especially true if their life depended on keeping those secrets (or perhaps their whole family’s lives), by implicit or direct risk and/or threat.

Let’s say these five core conspirators (with full knowledge of a given plan) each directly control — or strongly influence — five unwitting accomplices. The next compartments below those five, contain 25 unwitting accomplices who might think they are only working with the one participant on one project or task. And now we already have 150 people working unwittingly towards a plan of which only 5 people really understand, by definition of the strategy of compartmentalization.

So this study requires some significant translation. In this hypothetical, three tiers of compartmentalization scale the number of knowing participants from 150 to just 5. Perhaps there is some decent behavioral science on our ability to keep secrets. An established metric (instead of just 5) could use the number of all involved participants to estimate how many tiers of compartmentalization would be required to accomplish a given alternative theory.

In such a compartmentalized hierarchy, adding a fourth tier could then accomplish five separate tasks requiring more than 100 people, for a total of 775 partially unwitting participants. A fifth tier could accomplish 25 tasks requiring more than 100 people. It takes only eight tiers to involve over 400,000 people, the order of magnitude estimated for the moon landing project. Higher-level omissions and/or deceptions regarding the larger goals of a conspiracy, likely result in vast majority of participants believing their work is for the cover stories.

In this hypothetical, with compartmentalization factored in, one would need the first four tiers (and elements of the fifth) to all be “in the know” in order to meet the study’s definition of a ‘large conspiracy’ as having greater than 1,000 knowing agents. Again, having more than a couple tiers really “in the know” defies the definition of compartmentalization, which is a strategy of effective conspiracies like the Manhattan Project.

Indeed, most conspiracies which remain ‘theories’ do seem to have whistleblowers, leaks, or significant narrative holes within certain compartments, but not enough to blow the whole story wide open.

Please help encourage a world more dominated by open source information and operations.

(Published 8/24/16) Full transcript/essay: http://WikiWorldOrder.org/2016/08/24/please-compartmentalize-the-viability-of-conspiratorial-beliefs/
-------
A reaction to: "On the Viability of Conspiratorial Beliefs", by David Robert Grimes in PLOS, January 26, 2016
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147905
-------
When it comes to the strategy of compartmentalization, I suppose the reader (and/or author) just didn't need to know.
...
If large or significant conspiracies are too big not to fail (as this study claims), then please, let's at least call for an end to all covert operations within the CIA, NSA, FBI, etc... and their private contractors we pay for.
...
Beyond the glaring omission of compartmentalization, this study also fails to acknowledge the vital role of groupthink, required for larger, scientific, and/or open conspiracies to succeed.
...
Over-claiming consensus certainty, attacking straw man positions, or silencing evidence-based views on scientific issues… is anti-science.
...
People should be encouraged to study anything and everything.
...
Indeed, most conspiracies which remain ‘theories’ do seem to have whistleblowers, leaks, or significant narrative holes within certain compartments, but not enough to blow the whole story wide open.

Please help encourage a world more dominated by open source information and operations.
------
My essays on climate change: http://SolarNotBombs.org

(Published 8/24/16) Animation loop from video/essay:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BdZrre1i07I
http://WikiWorldOrder.org/2016/08/24/please-compartmentalize-the-viability-of-conspiratorial-beliefs/

Creative Commons 2016, feel free to remix and reuse:
http://WikiWorldOrder.org/video/art/compartmentfives-looped-hq-1min.mp4

http://wikiworldorder.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/compartmentfives.gif
http://gph.is/2c71cBj

----
From Wikipedia:

In matters concerning information security, whether public or private sector, compartmentalization is the limiting of access to information to persons or other entities who need to know it in order to perform certain tasks.

The concept originated in the handling of classified information in military and intelligence applications, though it dates back to antiquity, and was used to successfully keep the secret of Greek fire.
...
An example of compartmentalization was the Manhattan Project. Personnel at Oak Ridge constructed and operated centrifuges to isolate Uranium-235 from naturally occurring uranium, but most did not know what, exactly, they were doing. Those that did know, did not know why they were doing it. Parts of the weapon were separately designed by teams who did not know how the parts interacted.

(Published 8/19/16) Morgan Lesko, of WikiWorldOrder.org, was briefly interviewed by Russia Today while mourning police victims at the Black Lives Matter Protest in Washington DC on July 7, 2016. One Love.

Full original segment on RT:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dAbrWen1e7Y

(Published 9/14/15) Juxtaposed movie samples provide a loose alternate interpretation for the very first episode of Reading Rainbow.

This is a primary segment of the episode, sharing a process of industrially manufacturing bowling balls. When I watched the original for the first time in thirty years, the words felt analogous to the modern process of filling fledgling minds with ideas. As each mind is molded, beyond information, style variations are minimized to a handful of useful or marketable categories. Modern education was designed for the assembly line and for war, then was supplemented by television PROGRAMMING... especially 'educational' kids' shows like this one. Therefore, I thought perhaps this segment was explaining the point of the series, revealing the method within the content. Just a thought.

For details on these problems, PLEASE check out "The Underground History of American Education: An Intimate Investigation into the Prison of Modern Schooling," by John Taylor Gatto. I did not find inspiration in the Reading Rainbow segment to provide anything on the solutions side here. For an entertaining discussion in the solutions spectrum, check out the movie "Accepted". For detailed solutions, PLEASE check out the School Sucks Podcast.

http://SchoolSucksProject.com
http://www.unwelcomeguests.net/The_Underground_History_of_American_Education

This is educational commentary, provided via media juxtaposition, should qualify the free use of these samples.
http://WikiWolrdOrder.org/2015/09/17/molding-minds-reading-rainbow-video-remix/

(Published 4/20/15) Happy Holiday.
Extra to Celebrate this Year.
From D.C., the Freshest District of Cannabis.
Adults: Please Medicate, Recreate & Enjoy Safely.
In An Appropriate Set & Setting,
Thinking Through The Golden Rule.
Do Not Operate Cars or Heavy Machinery.
If Helping Lungs By Choosing Edibles or Teas,
Carefully Plan & Test Potency Before Sharing,
And Safely Store To Avoid Any Accidents.
Young People Benefit By Waiting Until Adult.
Drug Use Should Not Be A Criminal Issue.
All Drugs Are Public Health Issues.
And As With Everything, Enjoy In Moderation.

by WikiWorldOrder.org, Creative Commons 4/20/2015

More Sense at http://SchoolsNotPrisons.org

(Published 12/15/15) "Science publishes new NOAA analysis: Data show no recent slowdown in global warming"
http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/stories2015/noaa-analysis-journal-science-no-slowdown-in-global-warming-in-recent-years.html

There has evidently been a revision of the observational temperature data and/or its analysis, which I quoted in my research earlier this year:
http://SolarNotBombs.org/models-vs-data/

Question For Corbett: Have you looked into how this recent history was changed?
To http://CorbettReport.com
From http://WikiWorldOrder.org

(Published 3/24/15) Essay: http://SolarNotBombs.org/about/
Summary: Claiming 'consensus' and 'settled science' decades before observations can firmly endorse or reject the Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming Models is hurting the credibility of the scientific method in public discourse. Furthermore, if outgrowing fossil fuels is politically dependent on such a complex climate theory requiring so many more decades to be verified, it is extremely vulnerable to failure. We need - and have - better reasons than this one theory. "Solar Not Bombs" is not a think tank nor any type of organization. It is just a bumper-sticker-level catch phrase for my proposed solutions.
... My Motives, Potential Motives for Scientists, Potential Motives for Oligarchs, Final Personal Thoughts ...

Four-Part Essay/Video Series:

1. Strategic Solutions
http://SolarNotBombs.org/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C4-6BEmFkrk&list=PLyt4AlANVMNgQDNZhC-E_weYoGs8NeqR-&index=1

2. IPCC Models vs IPCC Data
http://SolarNotBombs.org/models-vs-data/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lVu2r6ddHYI&list=PLyt4AlANVMNgQDNZhC-E_weYoGs8NeqR-&index=2

3. Warm Consensus Pie
http://SolarNotBombs.org/consensus-pie/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=41hvwt9cTvE&list=PLyt4AlANVMNgQDNZhC-E_weYoGs8NeqR-&index=3

4. About the Author & Bigger Picture
http://SolarNotBombs.org/about/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PxBK9P1kqug&list=PLyt4AlANVMNgQDNZhC-E_weYoGs8NeqR-&index=4

Links in this Essay/Video:

rationalwiki.org/wiki/Scientific_consensus
wikipedia.org/wiki/Voluntaryism
wikipedia.org/wiki/Autodidacticism
theguardian.com/global-development/2013/sep/27/climate-change-poor-countries-ipcc
wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Limits_to_Growth
wikipedia.org/wiki/Closed_ecological_system
wikipedia.org/wiki/Cradle-to-cradle_design
youtube.com/results?search_query=%22free+energy%22+generator
wikipedia.org/wiki/Over-unity
youtube.com/watch?v=UK1dsHclQBc (eg. Eric Dollard)
youtube.com/results?search_query=magnet+motor+free+energy
teslamotors.com/blog/all-our-patent-are-belong-you
wikipedia.org/wiki/Desalination
nytimes.com/2015/01/17/science/earth/2014-was-hottest-year-on-record-surpassing-2010.html
washingtonpost.com/news/energy-environment/wp/2015/01/23/sorry-skeptics-nasa-and-noaa-were-right-about-the-2014-temperature-record/
columbia.edu/~jeh1/mailings/2015/20150116_Temperature2014.pdf
data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/FAQ.html
nasa.gov/press/2015/january/nasa-determines-2014-warmest-year-in-modern-record/wikipedia.org/wiki/Groupthink
wikipedia.org/wiki/Prussian_education_system
unwelcomeguests.net/Underground_History_of_American_Education
unwelcomeguests.net/Disciplined_Minds
nytimes.com/2015/03/17/science/the-new-optimism-of-al-gore.html
wikipedia.org/wiki/Henny_Penny
wikipedia.org/wiki/Survivalism
usgovernmentspending.com/spending_chart_1900_2020USp_XXs1li111mcn_F0t_US_Total_Government_Spending
wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052748704779704574553652849094482
wikipedia.org/wiki/Climatic_Research_Unit_email_controversy
wattsupwiththat.com/2009/11/22/cru-emails-may-be-open-to-interpretation-but-commented-code-by-the-programmer-tells-the-real-story/
blogs.nature.com/news/2010/01/climate_row_university_broke_l_1.html
youtube.com/watch?v=-OKmUYptkZw
wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_East_Anglia
corbettreport.com/articles/20100129_crimatologists_guilty.htm
bbc.com/news/blogs-echochambers-27074746
gallup.com/poll/180113/2014-approval-congress-remains-near-time-low.aspx
youtube.com/watch?v=2v_fffyFBtU (my remix: U.N. Speak)
nytimes.com/2003/06/08/nyregion/fyi-015636.html
wikipedia.org/wiki/Headquarters_of_the_United_Nations
wikiquote.org/wiki/David_Rockefeller (full Memoirs quote)
youtube.com/watch?v=FEh7qhk373I (NWO Defined)
peacerevolution.podomatic.com/entry/2012-07-21T06_32_28-07_00
youtube.com/watch?v=Pb33Xv73Acg (NWO quotes)
wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Open_Conspiracy
freedocumentaries.org/documentary/bbc-the-century-of-the-self-happiness-machines-season-1-episode-1
wikipedia.org/wiki/Council_on_Foreign_Relations
youtube.com/watch?v=VT3BzYUZpo4 (James Perloff, CFR)
wikipedia.org/wiki/RAND_Corporation
youtube.com/watch?v=0h8osUy4ZSQ (Alex Abella, RAND)
youtube.com/watch?v=Q4L7GKSfsDQ (Paul, CFR)
wikipedia.org/wiki/Intraspecific_competition
wikipedia.org/wiki/Kleptoparasitism
youtube.com/watch?v=qDWeafWklfk (my remix: Intraspecific Kleptoparasites)
merriam-webster.com/dictionary/anarchy
wikiworldorder.org/WWUD/ (Golden Rule ~art)
wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-aggression_principle
youtube.com/watch?v=H8TI-pm0m2o (Free Domain Radio, Non-Agression Principle)
youtube.com/watch?v=mK86S-HZxTE (AE911)
DontFallacyMeBro.com
WikiWorldOrder.org/about

SHOW MORE

Created 3 years, 3 months ago.

147 videos

Category Education

Collaboratively Outgrowing The Corporate-Industrial Complex - From open source intelligence, to open source communication, to open source software, to open source hardware, to open source ecology, to open source activism, the crowd-sourced Wiki World Order is already a self-organizing transparent, non-hierarchical, human revolution.

https://WikiWorldOrder.org
http://SolarNotBombs.org
http://DontFallacyMeBro.com