The Pandemic

It’s looking increasing likely that lockdowns are coming again. Our Overlords would want this to be done for several reasons. (There are oftentimes more than one reason behind the actions they take.) Anyhow …

Safe to say that lockdowns would present all sorts of problems for the people - one of which would be that it would make it more difficult to demonstrate in a normal fashion. If lockdowns were instigated, ordinary people would probably be more reluctant to go out and join a demonstration. At least, to be part of a demonstration, they would have to be more committed than otherwise would be the case. It would be unlikely, for instance, that parents would take their children on marches etc. Perhaps then only the hardcore element might be the ones to take to the streets in protest. And then the possibility of violent clashes would increase. This to my mind, is best avoided. Violence only plays into the hands of our Overlords.

So, what is to be done? Well, we must consider several things.

First off, we have to recognise that we are at war with our Overlords. Once we recognise this fact, then much flows from this.

Secondly, given that we are at war, we have to start thinking tactically. Our Overlords do, so we should also.

Thirdly, we have to use tactics which are in accord with our strengths.

Fourthly, we have to act in a non-violent manner. As I have already said, we shouldn’t, if at possible, resort to violence, as it plays into their hands. I recognise that sometimes this is not always possible and that at times it in necessary to act in order to prevent a worse situation from occurring – namely harm being done to yourselves. We are allowed to defend ourselves. But we should avoid being the aggressor.

Given what I have outlined, I think I have come up with a possible tactic. And it’s one which might even bring an end to this war relatively swiftly and relatively peaceably.

Lots of people have, so far, been attending marches, demonstrations and protests etc. Indeed their numbers have been growing as more and more people wake up. These marches, demonstrations and protests show “People Power” in operation. This is great, but the way I see it, such things are something of a wasted resource, at least I would venture that the resource can be better used elsewhere.

The operation I suggest can be summed up in a few words “Lockdown our Overlords.”

I propose finding out where our Overlords live, go to their homes and lock them down. Make sure that no one goes in to the property and no one leaves the property.

It might be an idea to make a citizen’s arrest if these people show themselves. But, I will leave that for others to decide on.

So, who should this be done to?

Principally, our politicians and the MSM.

As regards our politicians. Most people, those that consider themselves to be “awake”, should, by now be aware that the politicians are just puppets and their strings are being pulled by their puppet masters. Nevertheless, this operati

I saw a video today and felt compelled to produce another video on the topic of Adverse Effects. I should say, that I hadn’t seen it before I produced the other video I did today on Adverse Effects regarding anecdotal evidence.

What is presented in the video I saw by Dr Sucharit Bhakdi might well be the proof I have been waiting for.

Dr Sucharit Bhakdi: Organs Of Dead Vaccinated Proves Auto Immune Attack - 22/12/2021 (bitchute.com)

Until now, I have held back from saying that there are causal links between the administration of the vaccines and adverse effects - including the worst outcome which is obviously death.

I have urged caution on the basis that “correlation does not imply causation”. This maxim speaks to the cause and effect relationship between two variables. Just because there seems to be a strong correlation between people taking the vaccines and people suffering all sorts of conditions and even dying, doesn’t mean there is actually a causal link between them. To conclude that there is a causal link between them, is an error in reasoning. It’s a logical fallacy. And it’s important not to fall into this trap. Just because we might believe there to be a link, doesn’t mean there is one. Without proof, you have nothing but conjecture.

This is the reason why I have been wary, or hesitant. I did not want to jump to any conclusions and thereby fall into the trap.

The information relayed in the video in saw by Dr Sucharit Bhakdi however changes things entirely.

It represents the first bit of hard evidence – evidence that amounts to there being a proven link between the people taking the vaccines and dying. It’s the indisputable evidence that is required to damn the vaccines.

The size of the study might small, but nevertheless it can be used to support any arguments against anyone taking the vaccines.

More evidence, I dare say, will emerge in due course.

The evidence will come of course as the result of more deaths. This is most unfortunate and my heart goes out to all the families and friends of the deceased.

That said, this new bit of information is truly momentous. Its importance can not be underestimated. To put in colloquial terms, “it’s a game changer”.

Wise up and rise up.
Shar this video as widely as possible

I have been waiting for this moment with some degree of dread. I’m surprised that it hasn’t happened sooner. I wish that it wouldn’t have happened at all, but there we are …

I now know of four people who seem to have suffered adverse reactions after having taken the vaccines.

Two are family members. The other two, are people that I don’t personally know, but have been told about by a family member and a friend.

Of the two people that I have been told about … one was admitted to hospital after receiving a vaccine. I don’t know his status now. The other person died shortly after receiving the booster.

Of the two members of my family who have had problems, one has Bell’s Palsy now and the other suffered somewhat after having had a booster.

I will be focusing here on the family member who had the booster.

Let’s assume, for the purposes of this discussion, that the vaccines are bona fide and that the claims made about them, are valid – that they are indeed vaccines and are aimed at remedying the issue with COVID. And that they are not poisonous to humans - as has been alleged.

My family member who got the Booster dose was hit hard by it. I should say, just for the record, that she seemed to suffer no ill-effects from the previous two vaccinations. But with third one, she wasn’t so lucky. She was bed-ridden for a fair period and is still in recovery. I should also say that interestingly, she describes herself as having “got COVID”.

The next bit might seem like I’m going off on a tangent, but it ties in, so please bear with me … I’m sure that most people are by now aware of the history of vaccines - when and how vaccines were first developed. For those of you who aren’t aware, allow me to relay some information … Edward Jenner is credited with discovering vaccines in 1796 when he used a cow pox virus to give immunity from smallpox. He noticed that milkmaids didn’t suffer from (were immune to) small pox and speculated that they had immunity due to their body’s immune system having already dealt with the cow pox virus. The cow pox virus is part of the same family as small pox virus, but it’s a more benign version. He began to give an inoculum of cow pox to people and this seemed to give a sufficient level of immunity to small pox. This is called “cross immunization”.

Vaccines are made in a few different ways. They each differ in design depending on the strategy (the plan of attack) that has been decided on. Traditional vaccines have used T-cells to provide immunity. The vaccine tricks the body into remembering the profile of an attacker so that the body is in a position to act should exposure to that attacker occur. The benefit of vaccines is in providing immunity without having to experience the actual illness itself.

Dead, or disabled, viruses can be used. These are obviously not able to do any harm. Vaccines also sometimes use live viruses. It would obviously be too dangerous, and run entirely counter to desired effect, to introduce a real f

I should perhaps have mentioned this earlier but … I can make available the transcripts of all the videos I have so far made to anyone who wishes to have a copy. I have put a lot in the descriptions sections below the videos but there is a word limit.

I should say that I’m not too concerned about copyright issues. I’m not in this to make money. I’m only interested in getting the information out there as widely as possible in order to put an end to the misrule of those people who are in charge at present.

I am alas, not brilliant when it comes to technology. So, if there is anyone who happens to be more tech savvy than me – this should include most of the people on the planet and even some orangutans - and they can suggest a way of my doing this, I would appreciate it. Just leave suggestions in the comments.

Wise up and rise up.

This is a message to all the doctors and nurses and all the other health care professionals out there.

I’m not a health care professional. I’m just an ordinary citizen. But even I am aware that something is seriously amiss – at least I suspect that something very untoward is occurring.

The issue is you are better placed than me to know the real situation – especially those of you who are working in the hospitals and GP practises around the country. In fact, I think it’s safe to say that you are in a better position than most people to know what is really going on.

You are therefore somewhat obliged to speak up, are you not?

I should say what I have said does not apply to all doctors and nurses and all the other health care professionals. I have heard a good number of nurses and doctors speak out. This is, after all, how I’m aware of some of the things that are occurring. It’s not just stuff being said by so-called “Conspiracy Theorists”. If it were a bunch of “Conspiracy Theorists” who were the only ones talking about this stuff, I might be dubious. But it’s not. There is the Great Barrington Declaration for instance which has not got any coverage by the MSM.

So, the question is, why aren’t all of you doctors and nurses and all the other health care professionals speaking out?

You are all in the health care profession. Need I remind the doctors amoung you that you signed a hypocritic oath.

And all of you have a duty of care, do you not?

And this aside from this duty of care, I would say that you have a moral duty – a moral obligation to speak up.

From a legal standpoint also, you might well open yourself up to future prosecution.

The upshot of all this is, that by doing nothing, by saying nothing, by staying silent, you are complicit. You are acting in accord with whatever directive comes from the authorities above you.

I should also point out that everyday you’re making decisions. You put your uniform on. You exit your house. You turn up to work. You are told what to do by whatever authority is above you and you then decide to do as you are told.

So, whether you acknowledge this or not, you are making decisions every minute of every day. If you do nothing which is at variance to what you are being told to do, then you are deciding to go along with the present situation. These are the decisions you continually make each and every minute of each and every day.

Be aware that if you’re not part of the solution, then you are part of the problem.

If, at the very least, you join together and take a stand which results in the halting of the continued administration of the vaccines, this would be something. It would be a good start. Then, at any rate, a proper review of the situation could be carried out and the truth determined.

You would have done your duty in terms of care, morally speaking and legally also.

But, by you not speaking up, by not saying anything, the situation will continue.
means that

Wise up and rise up.

This is a message to any ordinary officer serving in the police force. or to anyone whose family member is an ordinary officer, or to anyone whose friend is an ordinary officer. It’s important that these people hear this message.

To the police officers themselves … you need to ask yourself some serious questions. And, you need to do so as a matter of some urgency.

Who do you serve? Are you serving the general public, or what I have called, our Overlords?
Are your efforts directed towards the best interests of the people?
Are you serving the public in the best way possible?
Who and what are you safeguarding? Are you safeguarding the general public, or our Overlords?
Are the orders that you are being asked to obey in line with the laws of the land?
Are you of the opinion that any crimes are being committed by our Overlords?
If there are, are you or any of your colleagues investigating these alleged crimes?

My guess is that you’ve already asked yourself some of these questions – or at least something along these lines and very likely, others besides. I’m sure that you have discussed things with your colleagues. I would certainly hope that this is the case at any rate.

Anyway, I hope that you share my view that what is happening is perhaps somewhat questionable – perhaps you might even consider it unjust.

Perhaps these statements below will help you make you think again about what you are doing.

Need I remind you that when you signed up to be an officer of the law, you swore an oath to serve us, the people. What is more, it’s us the people pay that your salaries.

I should point out, in case you don’t realise it, that you are the only force that is actively defending this corrupt system. Without you, the situation would be very different.

And be advised, that obeying orders is no defence.

I should also point out that everyday you’re making decisions. You put your uniform on. You exit your house. You turn up to work. You are given your orders. You then decide to obey those orders.

So whether you acknowledge this or not, you are making decisions every minute of every day. If you do nothing which is at variance to what you are being told to do, then you are deciding to obey orders and go along with the present situation. These are the decisions you continually make each and every minute of each and every day.

I would suggest that each and every one of you needs to think long and hard about what you are doing.

So if you decide to continue on with your present course of action, then you will have to face the consequences. Be aware that you yourselves might well find yourselves on the wrong side of the law. And be aware also that we, the people, will win in the end. And where does that then leave you?

So I make an appeal to you. Don’t just obey orders unquestioningly. Think about what you are doing.

I would suggest that it’s in your best interests, and in the interests of every other citizen, to do the right thing. But maybe, don’t just

I think that there are two principal questions we need to ask with regard to the Police. They are as follows?

1. What is their role in society?
2. Are they doing what they should be doing?

What is their role in society?
I’m going to rephrase this question just to make it a little clearer …

What is it that the Police ordinarily do? What are their usual duties? What should they be doing? So under ordinary circumstances …

• They should maintain law and order. They are the agency tasked with enforcing the laws of the land. In the States, the Police are referred to as “law enforcement” for this very reason.

• They should prevent crime by detecting, investigating, pursuing and prosecuting criminals.

• They should protect members of the public and their property against criminal acts which might result in harm being done to individuals. They should therefore maintain a required level of safety in society as a whole.

All the above serve to increase the quality of life for the ordinary citizen. Without the police carrying out these duties, these responsibilities that they are obliged to carry out, the quality of life for the ordinary citizen would suffer. There would a break down in law and order and all manner of crimes would necessarily increase. In short, chaos would ensue. Few of us would want that.

Suffice to say, that the Police play a hugely important role in society. The above list is very much abridged. The role of the police encompasses so much more … Their remit extends to cover a vast array of different jobs. For example, they are entrusted with various licensing and regulatory activities. But, that is beyond the remit of this video. So to move on …

This brings us to our next question …

Are they doing what they should be doing with regard to the current situation?
I have to answer this by saying “No.” The way I see it, the Police don’t seem to be doing what they should be doing. At least, I have to question the approach that they have thus far taken.

The Police should be working for the populace, but in this instance, they don’t appear to be doing that. In fact, they appear to be working against the populace.

It strikes me that something somehow has gone wrong in a serious way.

This seems to be not an unreasonable assessment of the situation. I would like to think that I ‘m correct in coming to this conclusion and that most people would, by and large, be in agreement.

I should say that I’m simply expressing my personal opinion. Maybe I’m wrong in saying this, but anyway.

To come to their defence, I think that the Police have been placed in a very awkward position.
They are, after all, tasked with maintaining law and order. And they are required to ensure that the laws of the land are followed. They are on the streets doing what they see as their duty.

I therefore don’t think we can blame the ordinary officers per se. They are just following orders. But more on that shortly.

Who is to blame then? Who is responsible for this

Holy shit!!! They’re waking up! Unfortunately they’re finding out the hard way! (bitchute.com)

This video has been made as an accompaniment to the previous two videos on the Truth. So maybe it might be best if you were to watch those short videos first, before watching this one.

Assuming that you haven’t watched them, or don’t want to … the contention in those videos is that truth is out there, but not so easy to find.

I consider myself to be a “truth seeker”. I’m very interested in finding out the truth. I do my best to track it down, getting as close to it as I can. And, I think it’s safe for me to say, that I’m not the only one. I’m sure that all of us who consider ourselves to be part of the what can be described as the “alternative community” are seeking the truth.

I would like to say that this should be the case for everyone, but my guess is most people, the “Normies” (as Clif High likes to refer to them as) don’t feel this way. Perhaps this is because they don’t know that they are actually being lied to. I’m sure that they assume that what they are being told is the truth. And so, they simply don’t know any better. Why would you continue to listen to the MSM if you knew that you were being lied to? It wouldn’t make sense to do that.

Anyway, how do we account for this discrepancy – the difference between “us” (the “Awake”) and “them” (the “Normies”)? I don’t know really. And I can’t really speak for anyone else. But I can speak about myself and my experiences. So what is it that makes me inclined towards the Alternative Space? Speaking personally, I can say that maybe it is something in my character … I have an enquiring mind; I have an antagonist relationship with authority; I’m somewhat mistrustful … But, anyway, that’s just me. As for any other so-called “Conspiracy Theorists” in the Alternative Space. I don’t know.

Perhaps a better question to ask would be … “Why don’t the “Normies” think as we do?” I’m sure that there are a whole host of reasons, but I’m going to propose one of them here.

So, to answer this question, let’s turn now the main theme of this video, namely Conspiracy Theories.

I’ve heard it alleged that the CIA were responsible for creating the label “Conspiracy Theories” and then they apply it to any things they didn’t want the general populace to know about. Whether that is true, or not, I have no clue. And because I have no way of knowing if they did, or didn’t, for me, it remains mere conjecture.

But, if they did do it, then they have to be congratulated. Some might be askance at me saying this. However, you have to admit that if they were responsible, then it has to be considered a hugely successful operation – or “Psy Op” to use the jargon. Credit where credit is due.

For the sake of this discussion, let’s assume that the CIA were responsible - that it was a tactic of theirs …

The truth is out there somewhere, we’ve just got to find it. This simple directive however, is easier said than done.

In practise, the truth is hard to find. As it turns out, the truth is actually rather an elusive creature, much like a Snow Leopard native to the mountains of Central and South Asia; Afghanistan, Mongolia, Siberia, the Tibetan Plateau and western China.

To understand this topic better, we will have to take a short trip into the sometimes peculiar world of Philosophy. But before you baulk at this, or groan and turn away, permit me to paint a picture of our endeavour. Maybe you can think of it like an expedition of sorts and you are an intrepid explorer, taking a trip into those remote mountain ranges in search of our shy and secretive Snow Leopard. Thought of in this way, you might find it quite interesting.

So, we know that the truth exists somewhere out there in those mountains, we just have to find it. Let’s assume we are in the area that the Snow Leopard inhabits and are about to set out on our expedition. We would of course need a local guide, someone with some knowledge of the locality and some tracking skills. Allow me to be your guide. I don’t claim to be the best guide in the world and I can’t guarantee that we will see our Snow Leopard, but hopefully we will get a sighting. On the plus side, I speak English which is I guess is useful.

So let’s begin …

Part of the problem is that we humans are, by our nature, subjective creatures. We live in our own little worlds.

We have our five senses – sight, hearing, smell, taste and touch. These are the means by which we perceive our worlds, the worlds we inhabit. But all these senses are not particularly reliable – at least they do not provide a reliable representation of reality. How so? Well, let me explain what I mean. Let’s take sight. Some people have excellent sight - 20 / 20 vision. Some people have poor sight. Some people are near-sighted. Some people are far-sighted. So, we can safely say that sight varies hugely between people. We don’t all see the world in the same way. Some people have only one eye (due to an accident, or birth defect). They appreciate the world differently to vast majority of us. Having two eyes helps us discern depths. For a person with one eye, their ability to perceive depth is going to be compromised. What about blind people? Their experience of the world is going to be markedly different to people with sight. What about people who are color blind? Someone seeing a tree will probably say the leaves are green, but a colour blind person might see those same leaves and say that the were grey. Who is right? Whose version of the colour of the leaves should we take as real, as a true representation of reality?

As a society, we tend accept the majority experience. We do this for the sake of living in a society without too much conflict. It’s the easiest course of action. It allows us to live together without there being quite so many problems. The

Let’s take a closer look at our “Subjective World”.

There are of course experiences that are common to us all. We breathe, we sleep, we eat, we defecate and we micturate. We all do these things, but even then, we do these differently. Take any group of people, even a small group, and you would discover differences. Sometimes these differences are only slight, sometimes great. But they are all nonetheless different. And this is just in terms of the short list of basic necessities of life – the physical things all of us are required as humans to do every day to survive.

As regards mental activities, this is possibly where our subjective realities diverge the most. Indeed, mental activities can be diverse as the number of people on the planet.

Broadly speaking, we each live in our own little, separate, subjective worlds. We are each going to approach the world from our own particular point of view. No one sees the world in quite the same way as anyone else. Seeing is perceiving. Even if two people are looking at the same thing, one person sees it from one particular perspective and the other person sees it from another particular perspective, a different perspective. And again, although these two perspectives might be similar, they will never ever be exactly the same.

Let’s return to our sense of sight to help explain this situation a little better.

Imagine you had a circle of say 30 people and in the middle was placed a vase of flowers. And then they were asked to paint this. Irrespective of their ability as artists, they would all paint the vase from a different angle.

The artistic movement of Cubism was based on this principle. Picasso painted pictures of objects like vases or people, but painted them as though they were seen from different points of view. However, rather than paint a series of different painting of the same object, the different perspectives were put onto a single canvas. Such paintings might strike us as strange perhaps, but people like Picasso were trying to show that things can be seen from different perspectives. We all see things differently. Even if this difference is only marginal, the reality we see is different for each and every one of us. It is subjective.

What is more, we live in an interpreted world.

Our brains interpret the world in a particular way. Our brains act as mediators between us and the Objective World out there. The raw stimuli of the Objective World gets interpreted by our brains. The act of perceiving occurs by our brains interpreting what is experienced.

If it helps you to conceive of this concept, you can use the analogy of an interpreter of a language. The interpreter tells you what the other person is saying. If you didn’t have an interpreter, all the words that you hear, would be just a mass of unknown words - mere sounds. And these sounds would make no sense to you. Likewise, with perception, our brain tells us what we are seeing. Our understanding, or appreciation of the world is the

This is a message to Russell Brand, so I hope you hear it.

I like your videos. I like your sense of humour. I should say that I love comedy – particularly British comedy. It’s the best in the world. (But perhaps I’m a bit biased in this respect)
Anyway, I appreciate what you do and what you’ve done in trying to provoke debate etc.
I appreciate how you approach things also. You’re open-minded and courageous …

I could go on, but praising you is not the purpose of this video.

I’m going to turn to more serious matters now. And I’m going to speak plainly. So I’, sorry if what I say upsets you. That is not my intention. I hope you will see beyond any discomfort this might cause and appreciate what I’m trying to say.

You are what is commonly known as “an Influencer”. You have a big audience – over 4.5 million subscribers. People therefore listen to what you have to say. This puts you in a special position in our society – it’s a privileged position.

Your role necessarily therefore comes with certain responsibilities. There is an inherent obligation to be as accurate and as truthful as possible.

Maybe you don’t recognise it as yet, but we are at war. We are in an information war.

Part 10 – Information war (i) (bitchute.com)

Here’s the sting …
You are a brilliant bloke, but you need to cut the crap. (Please excuse my ribaldry.)
This is no time for hilarity. We need to get serious here.
And also you need to put any ego aside. The message is more important than the messenger.

You need to use your platform to inform people about what’s really going on.

In saying all this I am assuming that you are not a shill, or some kind of controlled opposition.
I don’t believe you are. I believe that you’re a man of integrity. And I believe that you have a good heart.

Anyhow, I’ve said what I needed to say.

If anyone, in close relations with Russell, hears this, then I would be grateful if you were to pass it on to him.

By the way, I would rather have not have done it this way. I did try to contact you directly, but alas to no avail. You no doubt have many, many people contacting you. Hence this video.

Wise up and rise up.

It’s relatively easy to get a herd of sheep moving. Fear is a very effective motivator. When animals are frightened, they run. Only a small number need move in the first instance. Others in the herd then react instinctively to this by running themselves. Soon enough, the whole herd is moving.

This is one part of the flight, or fight response. It’s an innate response – it’s hard-wired in them. It’s a feature designed to keep them safe from hunting predators.

The shepherd uses this natural characteristic to his advantage. He manipulates this feature for his own ends. How else would one shepherd and his dog succeed in corralling a great number of sheep, moving them from one place to another?

Whether we care to admit it or not, we too are creatures. We too have a herd mentality. Fear is a great motivator in us also. The media did a good job of frightening the populace with the Virus and the Pandemic. People have been herded from the open field, driven down the lane, to an enclosure and then from there on to the slaughterhouse.

Wise up and rise up.

If it turns out that they, our Overlords, have indeed done what it’s believed that they are to have done, then, these are crimes against humanity. This should be entirely evident. At least, I can’t think of why anyone would ever argue against this assertion.

Let’s, for the sake of this discourse, assume that they have done these things. Then, they have committed mass murder. What’s more, it’s mass murder on a scale beyond any in human history, beyond Hitler, beyond Mao, beyond Stalin and indeed, it might well turn out to be, beyond all these combined.

Let’s now also assume, that they get caught, they are indited and their cases go to trial.

This will be, as has been commonly termed, Nuremberg 2.0.

I would welcome this day. I would welcome them being brought to justice. It can’t come soon enough as far as I’m concerned … but it looks like we’re going to have to be patient. I don’t want to take a diversion by talking about the topic of timings here, so let’s get back on track.

In the original Nuremberg trials, some of those who faced charges and were then found guilty, were hung - only a handful as it happened – but that is also a topic for another discourse perhaps.

So, let’s also assume that all the people facing charges in Nuremberg 2.0 are found guilty, how then should they be punished? What punishment would you say fits the crime?

The death penalty is the ultimate penalty. And have they not committed the most heinous of crimes? So therefore, it’s probably not unreasonable to suggest that they should be put to death in some fashion – be it by hanging, or by the electric chair, or by lethal injection.

Talking of which … I had originally thought that a good punishment was to inject them with their own vaccines – the ones they have used on the general populace and then see how they fare. This would literally be giving them “a taste of their own medicine”. This struck me as fitting and there seemed to me to be a certain sense of divine retribution in this also.

But I must tell you that I have since reconsidered. This option did not sit well with me.

They should be punished of course. However, while I think they deserve to die for what they have done, I actually don’t think they should be put to death. I don’t advocate capital punishment. I think it’s a barbarity. I’m against it also because essentially, it’s murder – it’s state sanctioned murder. And murder is murder at the end of the day.

I believe that killing is not just wrong, killing is a crime no matter who does it. And basically, by doing this, we as a society, would be committing a crime ourselves, wouldn’t we? We would all share some of that guilt. There would be a bit of blood on all our hands. I for one, don’t want any blood on my hands. Hence my making this appeal.

Also isn’t killing what they did? And isn’t it exactly what we abhor about them? To deliver the death penalty, is to do as they did. I myself do want to be like them in any way, shape, or form.