Click to copy, then share by pasting into your messages, comments, social media posts and websites.
Click to copy, then add into your webpages so users can view and engage with this video from your site.
Report Content
We also accept reports via email. Please see the Guidelines Enforcement Process for instructions on how to make a request via email.
Thank you for submitting your report
We will investigate and take the appropriate action.
Covid Vaccine Shedding (or Contagious) Causing Miscarriages and Blood Clots in Unvaccinated Females
Covid Vaccine Shedding (or Contagious) Causing Miscarriages and Blood Clots in Unvaccinated Females
Documents from Pfizer, Johns Hopkins and others discuss the potential for COVID-19 vaccines to “self-spread” to non-vaccinated individuals coming in contact with a recently vaccinated person.
In fact, a 2018 report by Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health’s Center for Health Security floated the idea of using this type of vaccine to intentionally spread to others for “protection” against disease.
Under the section, “Self-Spreading Vaccines,” the Johns Hopkins document states, “Selfspreading vaccines are genetically engineered to move through populations like communicable diseases, but rather than causing disease, they confer protection. The vision is that a small number of individuals in a target population could be vaccinated, and the vaccine strain would then circulate in the population much like a pathogenic virus, resulting in rapid, widespread immunity.”
The paper admits self-spreading vaccines being implemented would come with challenges, such as “informed consent” and potentially life-threatening contraindications.
“The ethical and regulatory challenges surrounding informed consent and prevention and monitoring of adverse events would be critical challenges to implementing this approach even in an extreme event,” the document states.
The Johns Hopkins report also noted, “There is a not insignificant risk of the vaccine virus reverting to wild-type virulence, as has sometimes occurred with the oral polio vaccine.”
A Pfizer placebo-controlled COVID-19 vaccine safety study similarly describes the potential for the shot to cause adverse effects in people in close contact with recently vaccinated individuals.
However, in the Pfizer study self-spreading is discussed as an unintentional possibility that could cause harm.
Under the section “Occupational Exposure,” the Pfizer study explains, “An occupational exposure occurs when a person receives unplanned direct contact with the study intervention, which may or may not lead to the occurrence of an AE. Such persons may include healthcare providers, family members, and other roles that are involved in the trial participant’s care.”
The “study intervention” being referred to is a person who recently received the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine as part of the study, and an “AE” is an adverse event or bad reaction.
The document warns under a section called “Exposure During Pregnancy” that if “A female family member or healthcare provider reports that she is pregnant after having been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact,” the exposure should be reported within 24 hours.
Another way someone could be exposed is if “A male participant who is receiving or has discontinued study intervention exposes a female partner prior to or around the time of conception.”
Pfizer even described a scenario where “A male family member or healthcare provider who has been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact then exposes his female partner prior to
or around the time of conception.”
In the piece, Lentzos poses the question, “What if instead of orchestrating complicated and resource-intensive campaigns to vaccinate humans against emerging infectious diseases like COVID-19, we could instead stop the zoonotic diseases that sometimes leap from animals to people at their source?”
“A small, but growing number of scientists think it’s possible to exploit the self-propagating properties of viruses and use them to spread immunity instead of disease,” Lentzos wrote.
She says scientists have been experimenting with such self-spreading vaccines for at least 20 years already and that the research has gained the attention of the US military.
According to Lentzos, self-spreading vaccines have roots in depopulation efforts aimed at culling pest populations.
“Australian researchers described a virally spread immunocontraception, which hijacked the immune systems of infected animals—in this case a non-native mouse species in Australia—and prevented them from fertilizing offspring,” the article explains.
Next, the article presents possible nefarious uses for self-spreading vaccines, for example, “You could engineer triggers into a virus that cause immune system failures in infected people or animals, a bit like HIV does naturally. Or you could create triggers in a virus that cause a harmful autoimmune response, where the body starts attacking its own healthy cells and tissues.”
One reason the military is interested in the technology is that it could be used to create a dangerous bioweapon.
https://www.infowars.com/posts/were-covid-19-vaccines-made-to-self-spread-to-non-vaccinated-people/
Category | News & Politics |
Sensitivity | Normal - Content that is suitable for ages 16 and over |
Playing Next
Related Videos
Why I Don’t Drink Soda Anymore
4 hours ago
Bart Sibrel and Joe Rogan on the Moon Hoax
15 hours ago
News Before 911 Cover up - CONTROLLED Explosion in the WTC
1 day, 3 hours ago
Justice Sotomayor: President Has Immunity to Order Assassinations of Rivals
1 day, 12 hours ago
Japan Fights Back Against WHO Pandemic Treaty & The KILL Shots
1 day, 14 hours ago
1 day, 16 hours ago
Warning - This video exceeds your sensitivity preference!
To dismiss this warning and continue to watch the video please click on the button below.
Note - Autoplay has been disabled for this video.